IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] On .ZZ

Matthew Pounsett <matt@conundrum.com> Fri, 22 November 2019 14:17 UTC

Return-Path: <matt@conundrum.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 718001207FE for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 22 Nov 2019 06:17:00 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.896
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.896 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=conundrum-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bg4_ZOMfZdw8 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 22 Nov 2019 06:16:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-lf1-x131.google.com (mail-lf1-x131.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::131]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ABF2012007C for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Fri, 22 Nov 2019 06:16:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-lf1-x131.google.com with SMTP id v24so5627371lfi.7 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Fri, 22 Nov 2019 06:16:58 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=conundrum-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=F1R6bDVkmYiPDvuVWGiZ83aYTJfzX7DmRJKcri4Lqgc=; b=iDVjLFzaDSL4zDmaEFPA5LGd3ICNDdJHKqYy87kCtYcB2dp8uxbXp8ZVqvs+a3BZOd zXOh17W8zptOY2190pjRO5UzdoREtj6Ezvg8QVCPEewDxJgjXCx8Su273ZLkD85VYUI5 bIn8YBiEDaFbeVmpJuKib2/i6Y5nIdnHY3dpLn3UXGrcNYgoKBxF35EDSHdyS4/DxwIN wVL4V9M8GKzmzhhruwJouI30esNbJL7Rc7JnAbY+duicCJc66RZuol2etLvs02vywN5j mHHee1z/ua1ZEx89bAZbfUeXpmuCmUEkdErCl/MXbe3QouqMlotflNEaqzcHPFnCVHwn QaIA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=F1R6bDVkmYiPDvuVWGiZ83aYTJfzX7DmRJKcri4Lqgc=; b=YnwMkFMpzjdOq70PBKoWlBeeikVuHPUzzHH9J184GDjEBJghECG4xHDfcJW6klQwz6 5z1R4cc708wB4/I0O/xf+P75ko85kBXNWu4GUAInCyGfTZsQELte2Rp6ILz9cUf6sXIV dzzAm3UW7302/g5OvEMtUY5ggUUEwz7jgZgORep0eti7p4Z6FNl13aUevkPrVZXvzmWf BK1bf0ctOBqyJcoI68VUa77drIKe0u+Nb2D+ZV8zRzHQkusUOwVYwUo5fVLY7/wYYgIY P71cWo8/iBUQjqMmMQEOmD6bVYyEpJohPbcyzXn/l8YxJZURyLvHaUpNeqwVSldcVTfm 4dXw==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUG8pMCuNP6OXMWefWNq8N2yZ0rqIPeu66P5Za8YxO2nUu7j1o0 fppsY5COYSyUqY9FaHmJHNvEaKmsp85+kHrxfPEQZA==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyW1Luj3qOJP0HyrpX6hbyTjU+6M/ICwRKEFlZf6HO2ug95hltWvPeQfbZzxMSAMjtQ9YdHUrFlEvvdjy8C2SA=
X-Received: by 2002:ac2:5616:: with SMTP id v22mr2640527lfd.84.1574432215937; Fri, 22 Nov 2019 06:16:55 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAHXf=0pOVM_MHypgL7uV88242ciBUXGpx6waUetxBbZhvth1gA@mail.gmail.com> <35F0456A-2BA5-4021-AA9D-A86889E74AE6@nohats.ca> <8a5833d5-192f-fdbf-2862-e3f144be80cc@nic.cz> <CAH1iCirfeaD5pJ1_Tm5PaATQ9_zmrj2PbSnPGyL8z40L-_z3nw@mail.gmail.com> <D7475E63-1047-4622-B7EE-DEEA1A891825@pch.net> <f4d32eb9-c073-463f-1914-bdc62ec372bf@time-travellers.org> <92EF6592-8801-4E58-B893-DDCF4F68934F@pch.net> <9f39c3b2-03c1-2d1d-e8af-b3c88ba19b62@lisse.na> <CAAiTEH9Xw8vCh-pg1UUdo5jNYc_h22dEzBeMwLaCNcm4AX2Asg@mail.gmail.com> <30D01186-451F-47DF-8A69-DD39DD1284F3@dnss.ec>
In-Reply-To: <30D01186-451F-47DF-8A69-DD39DD1284F3@dnss.ec>
From: Matthew Pounsett <matt@conundrum.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2019 09:16:43 -0500
Message-ID: <CAAiTEH_twwH60ypjHyOZ_ajG=dJyDWvyh0i8HqgH1scCWTo3Vg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Roy Arends <roy@dnss.ec>
Cc: Eberhard Lisse <el@lisse.na>, dnsop <dnsop@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000f448c50597f010e9"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/o8MK5lQstAYTRvoqWW7hw1yZ-zQ>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] On .ZZ
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2019 14:17:00 -0000

On Fri, 22 Nov 2019 at 09:05, Roy Arends <roy@dnss.ec> wrote:

>
>
> >
> > I read that to mean they are reserved for private use, and as mentioned
> above, any centralized/standardized use is going to conflict with that.
>
> No.
>
> No one is suggesting centralised use! The opposite. You can use it locally
> because there is no centralised use.
>

Standardized use isn't the same as globally reachable.  If you say "this
thing can be used for purpose X in any network" what happens when it's
already in use for purpose Y in someone's network, and they need X to work?


>
> Using your analogy, there should not be an RFC1918 because it
> “standardizes” that 10/0 (etc) can be used for private internets.
>
> > I'm surprised this thread has such legs.  I would have thought this
> would wind up when home. and home.arpa were mentioned way up thread.
>
> I’m surprised that this thread contains so much mis-information.
>

It would probably help if the thread had started with the intended use.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email