Re: [DNSOP] draft-ietf-dnsop-delegation-only is still not useful

John R Levine <johnl@taugh.com> Thu, 25 March 2021 02:08 UTC

Return-Path: <johnl@taugh.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66A5B3A1699 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 24 Mar 2021 19:08:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.1
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=iecc.com header.b=aJ9xDLeq; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=taugh.com header.b=JHqenjEr
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id a-9diy0BGFzW for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 24 Mar 2021 19:08:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gal.iecc.com (gal.iecc.com [IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126:0:43:6f73:7461]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D63A23A1694 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Wed, 24 Mar 2021 19:08:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 27008 invoked from network); 25 Mar 2021 02:08:11 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=iecc.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type; s=697d.605bf08b.k2103; bh=qgLRL5Zwwc1TO0EeLGqjE1Led2fEq+OWYbrLs4E96iQ=; b=aJ9xDLeqvdhOWWUSdmSiPwr9TiZqmCeQY0g/WhefAbVXn8oUMJfgkUGsOhN+CU9Qjeii27U2paJAyY+Ok3dt85TC4yM4dhtY9rrZox9IWEjkPfynF8lFIPVa7dhynDiM+UMiEkPBccsMW3tyKz0yhDUmQS4CrTwouI2yeRrER8EHT0hRMSE+Irphcj3/F+hPU7pJen48eSILeLKLFaVYx0NCqC+qhKhDDIJzZRzr6nDW0eVkzeGXmrU/gztbkSZuXb2BGvx670vnWc4hUl2zn7J0c+5GwD7EMZjF6HJap/SZEZfceDiaksum0w6ZlLI5vWhX5MI8DHLJzqSfg2oIGA==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=taugh.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type; s=697d.605bf08b.k2103; bh=qgLRL5Zwwc1TO0EeLGqjE1Led2fEq+OWYbrLs4E96iQ=; b=JHqenjEr5K0uZoffnRH3CTjtAXwAzThIpRatFa1p58j5lYOcmy04/lFtcxMWfOUL3RPlojOOsFXgOG9kCieVZfUJvBfLv39TKL9vIrEmgZZ6015l+v63bqEvBC15zNaEgDztTMEvgShgPn5VF0KL8hLgp25efg1PzSegLatzR82VdpmRdkoQuzHUIhmC6p89HvLs4ORCo/eLlDJPmYB9Xz6ktqgJ8SxDAhy7Ii5Q24x7Nnb1+MTdZk828jbzqUCT8zOPs0/78FMTRpifnc4/cvrKK7zH7O5SqnzM2JOLHiSc6KDQ8db98Roxpe+4/nlGjdkRjhDdzQs7/TVuiu96iA==
Received: from ary.qy ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) by imap.iecc.com ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) with ESMTPS (TLS1.2 ECDHE-RSA AES-256-GCM AEAD) via TCP6; 25 Mar 2021 02:08:11 -0000
Received: by ary.qy (Postfix, from userid 501) id B7EE371384B6; Wed, 24 Mar 2021 22:08:10 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ary.qy (Postfix) with ESMTP id 726EE7138498; Wed, 24 Mar 2021 22:08:10 -0400 (EDT)
Date: 24 Mar 2021 22:08:10 -0400
Message-ID: <57d1ca7a-eee8-63e8-1ce2-ad72357ebfb1@taugh.com>
From: "John R Levine" <johnl@taugh.com>
To: "Paul Wouters" <paul@nohats.ca>
Cc: dnsop@ietf.org
X-X-Sender: johnl@ary.qy
In-Reply-To: <3a5e86c7-b21d-8180-48f1-c87e9f665b@nohats.ca>
References: <20210307231602.27B506FC6E8D@ary.qy> <3a5e86c7-b21d-8180-48f1-c87e9f665b@nohats.ca>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/GUOEg-UBxPQ5ENKfN3MRzfK3SaI>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] draft-ietf-dnsop-delegation-only is still not useful
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2021 02:08:20 -0000

> A solution was given for moving signed glue to its own sub zone. I understand
> you don't think that solution works for you. That is fine.

But that makes the false assumptions that there is a problem to be solved, 
and that glue is the only thing other than NS found in TLD zones.

> I think there could be TLDs and SLDs that want to deploy this single > bit.

Could you identify the TLDs, please?  The TLDs I have talked to have 
shown no interest at all in this hack.

> If you want to stop wasting time, you could just let those who want
> it have the code point.

Um, I am pretty sure I am not the code point police.

Regards,
John Levine, johnl@taugh.com, Taughannock Networks, Trumansburg NY
Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail. https://jl.ly