IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] Review of draft-livingood-dns-redirect-00

Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org> Sat, 11 July 2009 23:59 UTC

Return-Path: <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
X-Original-To: dnsop@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 348103A6BE5 for <dnsop@core3.amsl.com>; Sat, 11 Jul 2009 16:59:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.415
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.415 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.184, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IAI9lVDTnSae for <dnsop@core3.amsl.com>; Sat, 11 Jul 2009 16:59:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from balder-227.proper.com (properopus-pt.tunnel.tserv3.fmt2.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f04:392::2]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29C2E3A6A73 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Sat, 11 Jul 2009 16:59:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.20.30.158] (75-101-30-90.dsl.dynamic.sonic.net [75.101.30.90]) (authenticated bits=0) by balder-227.proper.com (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id n6BNxdDJ045113 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sat, 11 Jul 2009 16:59:40 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from paul.hoffman@vpnc.org)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <p062408b6c67ed70acc85@[10.20.30.158]>
In-Reply-To: <C67B83C4.E855%Jason_Livingood@cable.comcast.com>
References: <C67B83C4.E855%Jason_Livingood@cable.comcast.com>
Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2009 16:59:38 -0700
To: "Livingood, Jason" <Jason_Livingood@cable.comcast.com>, dnsop@ietf.org
From: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Review of draft-livingood-dns-redirect-00
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsop>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2009 23:59:16 -0000

It seems inappropriate for the IETF to bless lying resolvers as a Best Current Practice. I doubt we as a community could have consensus on when lying is good, when it is neutral, and when it is bad. Without such agreement, we can't agree on how to run such servers. Having said that, the publication of a document such as this (with more input from the community) as a Informational RFC could indeed help the Internet.

--Paul Hoffman, Director
--VPN Consortium

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email