IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] Review of draft-livingood-dns-redirect-00

Ray.Bellis@nominet.org.uk Mon, 13 July 2009 14:28 UTC

Return-Path: <Ray.Bellis@nominet.org.uk>
X-Original-To: dnsop@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4EE03A6CC0 for <dnsop@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 13 Jul 2009 07:28:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.702
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.702 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.896, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cdCKiSMoJWuG for <dnsop@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 13 Jul 2009 07:28:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx4.nominet.org.uk (mx4.nominet.org.uk [213.248.199.24]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8231C3A6CC1 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Mon, 13 Jul 2009 07:28:02 -0700 (PDT)
DomainKey-Signature: s=main.dk.nominet.selector; d=nominet.org.uk; c=nofws; q=dns; h=X-IronPort-AV:Received:In-Reply-To:References:To:Cc: Subject:MIME-Version:X-Mailer:Message-ID:From:Date: X-MIMETrack:Content-Type; b=SkT060sa5L//PpApJDYHhVZV4QZyr5kaGDeSLLUqcKqYwgqj6kY3oPwG AOEKh8Kv4TKQoUfm/N/S0cxzfWULtR3ibsLYLfQNPxccmQO0W8B5X5dEQ aI2yUdjPdqiV1/v;
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=nominet.org.uk; i=Ray.Bellis@nominet.org.uk; q=dns/txt; s=main.dkim.nominet.selector; t=1247495314; x=1279031314; h=from:sender:reply-to:subject:date:message-id:to:cc: mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-id: content-description:resent-date:resent-from:resent-sender: resent-to:resent-cc:resent-message-id:in-reply-to: references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe: list-subscribe:list-post:list-owner:list-archive; z=From:=20Ray.Bellis@nominet.org.uk|Subject:=20Re:=20[DNSO P]=20Review=20of=20draft-livingood-dns-redirect-00|Date: =20Mon,=2013=20Jul=202009=2015:27:56=20+0100|Message-ID: =20<OF7DF796AD.4DDFC39E-ON802575F2.004F141D-802575F2.004F 7642@nominet.org.uk>|To:=20"Livingood,=20Jason"=20<Jason_ Livingood@cable.comcast.com>|Cc:=20dnsop@ietf.org |MIME-Version:=201.0|In-Reply-To:=20<C680B730.EB2C%Jason_ Livingood@cable.comcast.com>|References:=20<alpine.LSU.2. 00.0907131217470.30197@hermes-2.csi.cam.ac.uk>=20<C680B73 0.EB2C%Jason_Livingood@cable.comcast.com>; bh=4Xl3Zm21ru0oQgCd3hW+abxfBKiMvd2/nOhjlQ5n4WE=; b=b20Q2dHT7WuAkVVFHMzUs4+c+6LgExZ+9ldQJH+2FjX20YNA8QcXcqPr d70KugBBBLnuvwXpby0oAdi93AOWEiHns3GUkQkwi1T/ja5SdFe/6y1nN r6Ev0wJyNviqkxw;
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.42,390,1243810800"; d="scan'208";a="11445857"
Received: from notes1.nominet.org.uk ([213.248.197.128]) by mx4.nominet.org.uk with ESMTP; 13 Jul 2009 15:28:28 +0100
In-Reply-To: <C680B730.EB2C%Jason_Livingood@cable.comcast.com>
References: <alpine.LSU.2.00.0907131217470.30197@hermes-2.csi.cam.ac.uk> <C680B730.EB2C%Jason_Livingood@cable.comcast.com>
To: "Livingood, Jason" <Jason_Livingood@cable.comcast.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 8.5 December 05, 2008
Message-ID: <OF7DF796AD.4DDFC39E-ON802575F2.004F141D-802575F2.004F7642@nominet.org.uk>
From: Ray.Bellis@nominet.org.uk
Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2009 15:27:56 +0100
X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on notes1/Nominet(Release 7.0.1FP1 | May 25, 2006) at 13/07/2009 03:28:31 PM, Serialize complete at 13/07/2009 03:28:31 PM
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=_alternative 004F7640802575F2_="
Cc: dnsop@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Review of draft-livingood-dns-redirect-00
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsop>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2009 14:28:06 -0000

> I think we probably also need to address 
> the fact that mail servers should not use resolvers that perform DNS
> redirect (this was assumed but should be explicit).

At least when you do it on your recursive servers you're only affecting 
your own customers, who in most cases can vote with their wallets when 
they don't like it.

When it's done on the authoritative servers no-one has a choice :(

Ray

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email