IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] Review of draft-livingood-dns-redirect-00

"Livingood, Jason" <Jason_Livingood@cable.comcast.com> Tue, 14 July 2009 13:17 UTC

Return-Path: <jason_livingood@cable.comcast.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A0EF3A6ACB for <dnsop@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 14 Jul 2009 06:17:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.135
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.135 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=2.328, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_MODEMCABLE=0.768, HOST_EQ_MODEMCABLE=1.368, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5yI4Hwkynh28 for <dnsop@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 14 Jul 2009 06:17:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pacdcimo01.cable.comcast.com (PacdcIMO01.cable.comcast.com [24.40.8.145]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 483143A68B0 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Tue, 14 Jul 2009 06:17:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ([10.52.116.30]) by pacdcimo01.cable.comcast.com with ESMTP id 5503620.45501706; Tue, 14 Jul 2009 09:16:13 -0400
Received: from PACDCEXCMB04.cable.comcast.com ([24.40.15.86]) by PAOAKEXCSMTP01.cable.comcast.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Tue, 14 Jul 2009 09:16:13 -0400
Received: from 10.36.138.31 ([10.36.138.31]) by PACDCEXCMB04.cable.comcast.com ([24.40.15.86]) via Exchange Front-End Server webmail.comcast.com ([24.40.8.153]) with Microsoft Exchange Server HTTP-DAV ; Tue, 14 Jul 2009 13:15:29 +0000
User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/12.19.0.090515
Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2009 09:15:24 -0400
From: "Livingood, Jason" <Jason_Livingood@cable.comcast.com>
To: Suzanne Woolf <woolf@isc.org>
Message-ID: <C681FD2C.EC64%Jason_Livingood@cable.comcast.com>
Thread-Topic: [DNSOP] Review of draft-livingood-dns-redirect-00
Thread-Index: AcoEhSWD509BP2m3xEGTU/LqdCekiA==
In-Reply-To: <20090714125803.GA18883@farside.isc.org>
Mime-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 14 Jul 2009 13:16:13.0765 (UTC) FILETIME=[432CC750:01CA0485]
Cc: dnsop@ietf.org, Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Review of draft-livingood-dns-redirect-00
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsop>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2009 13:17:15 -0000

On 7/14/09 8:58 AM, "Suzanne Woolf" <woolf@isc.org> wrote:

> In this case, we're talking about resolvers replacing
> authoritative server data with their own.

Actually, I thought the case was resolvers providing an alternate response,
where NO authoritative data exists.  ??

> To the draft specifically: the goal behind it is laudable, and a lot
> of the complaints about it are in the nature of shooting the
> messenger.  I'm one of the people who shares the belief that there's
> no "Best" in this space to justify the "BCP" tag, but an informational
> document will be useful. I look forward to the -01 and the discussion
> in Stockholm.

Yes, I suspect you may well be right on Informational vs. BCP.  But I'm
pleased with the detailed feedback I have thus far received.

Jason

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email