IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] Review of draft-livingood-dns-redirect-00

"Dan Wing" <dwing@cisco.com> Sun, 12 July 2009 19:32 UTC

Return-Path: <dwing@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C619528C187 for <dnsop@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 12 Jul 2009 12:32:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.54
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.54 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.059, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ba-GmyqsSvEw for <dnsop@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 12 Jul 2009 12:32:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sj-iport-6.cisco.com (sj-iport-6.cisco.com [171.71.176.117]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D38EA28C17A for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Sun, 12 Jul 2009 12:32:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ApsEAMLXWUqrR7O6/2dsb2JhbACLAqcyiCOORwWECYFC
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.42,387,1243814400"; d="scan'208";a="344910912"
Received: from sj-dkim-2.cisco.com ([171.71.179.186]) by sj-iport-6.cisco.com with ESMTP; 12 Jul 2009 19:32:35 +0000
Received: from sj-core-1.cisco.com (sj-core-1.cisco.com [171.71.177.237]) by sj-dkim-2.cisco.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id n6CJWZXv022421; Sun, 12 Jul 2009 12:32:35 -0700
Received: from dwingwxp01 ([10.32.240.196]) by sj-core-1.cisco.com (8.13.8/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n6CJWZgc005477; Sun, 12 Jul 2009 19:32:35 GMT
From: Dan Wing <dwing@cisco.com>
To: "'Livingood, Jason'" <Jason_Livingood@cable.comcast.com>, dnsop@ietf.org
References: <C67B83C4.E855%Jason_Livingood@cable.comcast.com>
Date: Sun, 12 Jul 2009 12:32:35 -0700
Message-ID: <017801ca0327$823bb780$c4f0200a@cisco.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11
In-Reply-To: <C67B83C4.E855%Jason_Livingood@cable.comcast.com>
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3350
Thread-Index: AcoAqUFjrxCIoAdmb0+Y1caf3K8+hwCfWUhw
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; l=1038; t=1247427155; x=1248291155; c=relaxed/simple; s=sjdkim2002; h=Content-Type:From:Subject:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; d=cisco.com; i=dwing@cisco.com; z=From:=20=22Dan=20Wing=22=20<dwing@cisco.com> |Subject:=20RE=3A=20[DNSOP]=20Review=20of=20draft-livingood -dns-redirect-00 |Sender:=20; bh=9rsMZw4JzVSfwbj3oZlsTxHSTmzzhwFK0t3r+WAFLfA=; b=kH1xU+z0tsePtJxoWMgE4YZfYNHOE7grhSfvpXEbIbZ+V/L/bvkK52DsoS gKVoMI+XmQyKdHDeHgGH0AntIr0GaNfMz8pxjJvdULOeIZbCgd7flgmCdh4H 6zT84qk+O8;
Authentication-Results: sj-dkim-2; header.From=dwing@cisco.com; dkim=pass ( sig from cisco.com/sjdkim2002 verified; );
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Review of draft-livingood-dns-redirect-00
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsop>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 12 Jul 2009 19:32:06 -0000

> -----Original Message-----
> From: dnsop-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:dnsop-bounces@ietf.org] 
> On Behalf Of Livingood, Jason
> Sent: Thursday, July 09, 2009 8:24 AM
> To: dnsop@ietf.org
> Subject: [DNSOP] Review of draft-livingood-dns-redirect-00
> 
> I submitted this draft, which you can find at 
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-livingood-dns-redirect-00, 
> before the -00 cutoff on Monday, and it will be discussed in 
> the DNSOP WG meeting at IETF 75 (it is listed on the agenda).
> 
> If anyone is interested and has time before IETF 75, I'm 
> happy to take feedback before then obviously.  Please note 
> that there is a list of open items at the end, which we plan 
> to address in subsequent versions.

The draft would benefit from a discussion of the interaction
with DNS64, draft-ietf-behave-dns64.  The specific case that
would be a problem is if the end user's host (or site) is
doing its own DNS64 AAAA synthesis, which is necessary if the
host (or site) is doing its own DNSSEC validation.

-d

v2.46.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status