IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] Review of draft-livingood-dns-redirect-00

"Livingood, Jason" <Jason_Livingood@cable.comcast.com> Mon, 13 July 2009 14:04 UTC

Return-Path: <jason_livingood@cable.comcast.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18DF83A693E for <dnsop@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 13 Jul 2009 07:04:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.86
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.86 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=3.139, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_MODEMCABLE=0.768, HOST_EQ_MODEMCABLE=1.368, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE=1.396, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8, RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO=2.067]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Yl-JvdSeP3Vd for <dnsop@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 13 Jul 2009 07:04:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pacdcimo01.cable.comcast.com (PacdcIMO01.cable.comcast.com [24.40.8.145]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1AB913A681E for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Mon, 13 Jul 2009 07:04:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ([10.52.116.31]) by pacdcimo01.cable.comcast.com with ESMTP id 5503620.45359017; Mon, 13 Jul 2009 10:04:51 -0400
Received: from PACDCEXCMB04.cable.comcast.com ([24.40.15.86]) by PAOAKEXCSMTP02.cable.comcast.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Mon, 13 Jul 2009 10:04:51 -0400
Received: from 198.137.252.126 ([198.137.252.126]) by PACDCEXCMB04.cable.comcast.com ([24.40.15.86]) via Exchange Front-End Server webmail.comcast.com ([198.137.252.76]) with Microsoft Exchange Server HTTP-DAV ; Mon, 13 Jul 2009 14:04:35 +0000
User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/12.19.0.090515
Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2009 10:04:32 -0400
From: "Livingood, Jason" <Jason_Livingood@cable.comcast.com>
To: Tony Finch <dot@dotat.at>, Florian Weimer <fw@deneb.enyo.de>
Message-ID: <C680B730.EB2C%Jason_Livingood@cable.comcast.com>
Thread-Topic: [DNSOP] Review of draft-livingood-dns-redirect-00
Thread-Index: AcoDrCyLhny5EYBhRSOejTMvWu/1TgAFquxH
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LSU.2.00.0907131217470.30197@hermes-2.csi.cam.ac.uk>
Mime-version: 1.0
Content-type: multipart/alternative; boundary="B_3330324273_400860"
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 13 Jul 2009 14:04:51.0684 (UTC) FILETIME=[E3FA2240:01CA03C2]
Cc: dnsop@ietf.org, Jelte Jansen <jelte@NLnetLabs.nl>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Review of draft-livingood-dns-redirect-00
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsop>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2009 14:04:58 -0000

Thanks for the suggestion, Tony.  I will add that to my tracking list for
the next revision (and may email you to confirm what I have might be
satisfactory).  I think we probably also need to address the fact that mail
servers should not use resolvers that perform DNS redirect (this was assumed
but should be explicit).

Regards
Jason
> 
>> > Anyway, I think DNS rewriting is mainly for folks who also block
>> > 25/TCP in- and outgoing or list the address space on the PBL and
>> > similar DNSBLs, so the SMTP argument is not really valid anymore.
> 
The draft should probably say something like that explicitly.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email