Re: [DNSOP] partial glue is not enough, I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-glue-is-not-optional-00.txt

Paul Vixie <paul@redbarn.org> Thu, 02 July 2020 07:53 UTC

Return-Path: <paul@redbarn.org>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C37373A0DF9 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 2 Jul 2020 00:53:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rJTorSVEs-aS for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 2 Jul 2020 00:52:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from family.redbarn.org (family.redbarn.org [24.104.150.213]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BA3203A0DF8 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Thu, 2 Jul 2020 00:52:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from linux-9daj.localnet (dhcp-166.access.rits.tisf.net [24.104.150.166]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (1024 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by family.redbarn.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 71180B0588; Thu, 2 Jul 2020 07:52:59 +0000 (UTC)
From: Paul Vixie <paul@redbarn.org>
To: dnsop@ietf.org
Cc: John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>, Paul Vixie <paul@redbarn.org>
Date: Thu, 02 Jul 2020 07:52:58 +0000
Message-ID: <1738263.TRGBkWWA7Y@linux-9daj>
Organization: none
In-Reply-To: <2843010.V8yvLItfke@linux-9daj>
References: <20200702011816.D4B0D1C3CD10@ary.qy> <2843010.V8yvLItfke@linux-9daj>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/TAxwOwgxUAYw4TH_u71wK1fnXaU>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] partial glue is not enough, I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-glue-is-not-optional-00.txt
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Jul 2020 07:53:01 -0000

On Thursday, 2 July 2020 07:47:36 UTC Paul Vixie wrote:
> On Thursday, 2 July 2020 01:18:16 UTC John Levine wrote:
> > ...
> 
> this is the draft where that issue would be decided, so it's good we're
> talking about it. ...

by the way, this is what kato and i, and later jabley, were trying to get at 
with

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-respsize/

but it was like moving mud with a toothpick, so after eleven years (2003 to 
2014) we gave it up. there are probably some good ideas in there, even now.

-- 
Paul