Re: [DNSOP] Working Group Last Call

Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net> Thu, 22 September 2016 13:58 UTC

Return-Path: <warren@kumari.net>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45A2312BB8D for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 22 Sep 2016 06:58:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kumari-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3u1qocPHWr48 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 22 Sep 2016 06:58:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qk0-x22a.google.com (mail-qk0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c09::22a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8C84B12DDC5 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Thu, 22 Sep 2016 06:40:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qk0-x22a.google.com with SMTP id g67so16039590qkd.0 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Thu, 22 Sep 2016 06:40:27 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kumari-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=/aXHHowidf1efcVhWjl8wHuuAeJu2H3WrC5ZRDJEF9s=; b=BKw5RuHF1Z7B5FvH+o5qwR5HI4Rqxa3WzwawNQ6DjDd2S9qA5DZM7u7Wo2JoQGkUEy In3PoJYX8lwJsydvL2RMrumkC5Gj5p2yV1FPgF+4Xcrri/SGMwru0h4QSLg9SHOONGlw 3j9Jx2gco5ck6ys5OWXmwOumpFQq8IGqlt3F4TY+KcOgOwvCHevsfuKekBAo/lwCVo7G aHhGowUE7EwQXxsjpn9OGaDHaOvJHQ5JvlD8ILD0ebgERkvpepNMW3RmpE44ukfjy4uV dIna2nCYGK5hWaSVy/01bDB/nUETAHO79hSCTyAa/B7szIx3OFMpDOcUmOCwD9qM4+sk Hz9g==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=/aXHHowidf1efcVhWjl8wHuuAeJu2H3WrC5ZRDJEF9s=; b=UVOrBcbq4Q4A0x/3E6SEUpzkOCeuc9zGTwHhmgJ6yqJNBbfdh4IwQNoCav3gRh/ztx EcqdAYHo1UGEoQweKDSr/89fJN0/0RArIRW5+wE5EvH4dy+T5kmv8e+5iAwVjFG/4H7D yiWBKIGde6ytQFVr3xdnaAROTWaaWMHVczpN1t54rJaqB5pAzChC5NmMOFzk1j/z9iSR tAUS/+okt5dKziwIX9mAhRdYR8UvM5ZJoUNnG528CFrw25Vjw6rcEjbmZQluQPM0ww6y EWR15F0s2EeJPJ7UhA7NpvPQcJ2+q8DL+rmH1bsQusZZH2kioAirhD5RLqCTKne06SYM +VOg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AA6/9RlrckSZjJgGBNyxyovmeCufQi5bwBEM99WSpijxHa8zAxpHYTJz11+B7CkvID5T+xmbMuJAAIAv39VYP/eU
X-Received: by 10.55.141.199 with SMTP id p190mr2169868qkd.185.1474551626634; Thu, 22 Sep 2016 06:40:26 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.55.147.196 with HTTP; Thu, 22 Sep 2016 06:40:25 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <40d5f4b1-3019-7f8a-ecc0-2f4d13e3eadf@gmail.com>
References: <40d5f4b1-3019-7f8a-ecc0-2f4d13e3eadf@gmail.com>
From: Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net>
Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2016 09:40:25 -0400
Message-ID: <CAHw9_iK3=AC5s+MVkDo=gYia48e-HFXDBxpcexR2avFdUm1ukQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Tim Wicinski <tjw.ietf@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=94eb2c081fdee8ef32053d18cd5d
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/tr6owNT_5R0bYEHxCv0b_IGkU9E>
Cc: dnsop <dnsop@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Working Group Last Call
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2016 13:58:21 -0000

On Thursday, September 22, 2016, Tim Wicinski <tjw.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:

> All
>
> This draft has been worked on and it seems that the Working Group is happy
> with the updates that have been made and I feel it's ready for the next
> step.
>
> This starts a Working Group Last Call for:
>         "Aggressive use of NSEC/NSEC3"
>       draft-ietf-dnsop-nsec-aggressiveuse
>
> Current versions of the draft is available here:
>    https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-nsec-aggressiveuse/
>
> Please review the draft and offer relevant comments. Also, if someone
> feels the document is *not* ready for publication, please speak out with
> your reasons.
>
> It's currently marked as "Proposed Standard", so if folks feel differently
> then please speak up.



 And as a quick reminder to readers we made it PS because it updates
RFC4035.

W



>
> This starts a two week Working Group Last Call process, and ends at
> midnight 7 October 2016 UTC.
>
> thanks
> tim
>
> _______________________________________________
> DNSOP mailing list
> DNSOP@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
>


-- 
I don't think the execution is relevant when it was obviously a bad idea in
the first place.
This is like putting rabid weasels in your pants, and later expressing
regret at having chosen those particular rabid weasels and that pair of
pants.
   ---maf