Re: [dtn-interest] Re : Re: Question

sitaraman@nmsworks.co.in Thu, 31 January 2013 01:36 UTC

Return-Path: <sitaraman@nmsworks.co.in>
X-Original-To: dtn-interest@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dtn-interest@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F297721F87A4 for <dtn-interest@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 Jan 2013 17:36:32 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.035
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.035 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.564, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BAfjmcw2YbUX for <dtn-interest@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 Jan 2013 17:36:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: from indlocal.nmsworks.co.in (indus.nmsworks.co.in [14.140.238.3]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30AB921F87A3 for <dtn-interest@irtf.org>; Wed, 30 Jan 2013 17:36:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: from www.nmsworks.co.in (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by indlocal.nmsworks.co.in (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id r0V1YBJC007653; Thu, 31 Jan 2013 07:04:11 +0530
Received: from 101.63.148.194 (SquirrelMail authenticated user sitaraman) by www.nmsworks.co.in with HTTP; Thu, 31 Jan 2013 07:04:11 +0530 (IST)
Message-ID: <51594.101.63.148.194.1359596051.squirrel@www.nmsworks.co.in>
In-Reply-To: <51271.101.63.148.194.1359591427.squirrel@www.nmsworks.co.in>
References: <8759cd2d5ec7cfe81d6bdb4af9f4442d@merisier.isae.fr> <51271.101.63.148.194.1359591427.squirrel@www.nmsworks.co.in>
Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2013 07:04:11 +0530
From: sitaraman@nmsworks.co.in
To: sitaraman@nmsworks.co.in
User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
Importance: Normal
X-NMSWorks-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information
X-NMSWorks-MailScanner-ID: r0V1YBJC007653
X-NMSWorks-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-NMSWorks-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam (whitelisted), SpamAssassin (not cached, score=-2.9, required 4, autolearn=not spam, ALL_TRUSTED -1.00, BAYES_00 -1.90)
X-NMSWorks-MailScanner-From: sitaraman@nmsworks.co.in
Cc: dtn-interest@irtf.org
Subject: Re: [dtn-interest] Re : Re: Question
X-BeenThere: dtn-interest@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "The Delay-Tolerant Networking Research Group \(DTNRG\) - Announce." <dtn-interest.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/dtn-interest>, <mailto:dtn-interest-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.irtf.org/mail-archive/web/dtn-interest>
List-Post: <mailto:dtn-interest@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dtn-interest-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/dtn-interest>, <mailto:dtn-interest-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2013 01:36:33 -0000

I should rather say "in addition to" instead of "as opposed to" in the below
> Hi Emmanuel,
>  This looks great to me, thanks for this pointer. Only one scenario comes
> to mind, if it so happens that the expected bundle loss rate, even if for
> brief periods, is underestimated. Such scenarios could perhaps be
> relevant in space as intense disturbances for brief period is more likely
> than a steady noise, and with Tetrys, it would be inefficient to have the
> expected bundle loss rate set at its peak.
>  I am tending to think while Tetrys could be a default scheme running in
> the DTN, DSN, there is needed a scheme that can put out fires
> occasionally?
> Sitaraman
>>
>> Hi Sitaraman
>>
>>> Thanks much for this pointer, it will help me learn this aspect.
>>> In general a question remains that i have, for the group as  whole.
>>> A lot seems to have already been done  and literature and code
>>> available
>>> in FEC and Erasure Codes as has been made available from  the
>>> discussion
>>> on this group  Do these complement or can they replace loss (chunks
>>> of
>>> data compeletely lost so that there is not anything to decode from)
>>> handling mechansims?
>>
>> Concerning this point, you'll find a study that uses such scheme to
>> rebuild lost chunks in "Robust streaming in delay tolerant networks":
>> see http://oatao.univ-toulouse.fr/4111/
>> The erasure coding scheme is a specific elastic-window encoding scheme
>> named Tetrys: see http://websites.isae.fr/tetrys/
>>
>> Emmanuel
>>
>> --
>> This message has been scanned for viruses and
>> dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
>> believed to be clean.
>>
>
>
>
> --
> This message has been scanned for viruses and
> dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
> believed to be clean.
>
> _______________________________________________
> dtn-interest mailing list
> dtn-interest@irtf.org
> https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/dtn-interest
>



-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.