Re: [dtn-interest] Question

"Burleigh, Scott C (313B)" <scott.c.burleigh@jpl.nasa.gov> Sun, 27 January 2013 19:04 UTC

Return-Path: <scott.c.burleigh@jpl.nasa.gov>
X-Original-To: dtn-interest@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dtn-interest@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7581321F88AE for <dtn-interest@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 27 Jan 2013 11:04:05 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LkiXIORCU5nT for <dtn-interest@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 27 Jan 2013 11:04:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.jpl.nasa.gov (smtp.jpl.nasa.gov [128.149.139.106]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8396821F8549 for <dtn-interest@irtf.org>; Sun, 27 Jan 2013 11:04:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.jpl.nasa.gov (ap-ehub-sp02.jpl.nasa.gov [128.149.137.149]) by smtp.jpl.nasa.gov (Sentrion-MTA-4.2.2/Sentrion-MTA-4.2.2) with ESMTP id r0RJ427r006224 (using TLSv1/SSLv3 with cipher AES128-SHA (128 bits) verified NO); Sun, 27 Jan 2013 11:04:02 -0800
Received: from AP-EMBX-SP40.RES.AD.JPL ([169.254.7.60]) by ap-ehub-sp02.RES.AD.JPL ([fe80::dd85:7b07:1e36:7e3c%15]) with mapi id 14.02.0318.001; Sun, 27 Jan 2013 11:04:02 -0800
From: "Burleigh, Scott C (313B)" <scott.c.burleigh@jpl.nasa.gov>
To: "sitaraman@nmsworks.co.in" <sitaraman@nmsworks.co.in>, "dtn-interest@irtf.org" <dtn-interest@irtf.org>
Thread-Topic: [dtn-interest] Question
Thread-Index: AQHN/K7kpWlQqXgPhUW6nitP3+kFHJhdg05w
Date: Sun, 27 Jan 2013 19:04:01 +0000
Message-ID: <A5BEAD028815CB40A32A5669CF737C3B23574324@ap-embx-sp40.RES.AD.JPL>
References: <60540.115.242.217.223.1359305486.squirrel@www.nmsworks.co.in>
In-Reply-To: <60540.115.242.217.223.1359305486.squirrel@www.nmsworks.co.in>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [128.149.137.113]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Source-Sender: scott.c.burleigh@jpl.nasa.gov
X-AUTH: Authorized
Subject: Re: [dtn-interest] Question
X-BeenThere: dtn-interest@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "The Delay-Tolerant Networking Research Group \(DTNRG\) - Announce." <dtn-interest.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/dtn-interest>, <mailto:dtn-interest-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.irtf.org/mail-archive/web/dtn-interest>
List-Post: <mailto:dtn-interest@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dtn-interest-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/dtn-interest>, <mailto:dtn-interest-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Jan 2013 19:04:05 -0000

Hi, Sitaraman.  It's correct to state that DTN is based on potentially prolonged, potentially non-volatile storage at forwarding points (the original source and all routers along the end-to-end path) and on potential retransmission at all forwarding points.

But forwarding points other than the original source are features of specific topologies, not mandatory elements of the architecture.  Disruption in communication between the endpoints of a long-delay source-destination pair is handled by storage and retransmission, both at the source and also at whatever other nodes may be involved in the communication.  Intermediate nodes are not required in order to make DTN work.

For example, in the DINET experiment in 2008 we did DTN communication between nodes on Earth and a node aboard the Deep Impact flyby spacecraft in interplanetary space, 10-15 million miles away.  There were disruptions -- lapses in connectivity -- lasting several days, but DTN had no difficulty handling them despite the fact that there were no intermediate nodes between the spacecraft and the data sources and sinks on Earth.

Scott

-----Original Message-----
From: dtn-interest-bounces@irtf.org [mailto:dtn-interest-bounces@irtf.org] On Behalf Of sitaraman@nmsworks.co.in
Sent: Sunday, January 27, 2013 8:51 AM
To: dtn-interest@irtf.org
Subject: [dtn-interest] Question

Hi,
 Is it correct to state that DTN adopts a store and forward mechansim and gets around delay and disruption by having intermediate nodes retransmit on failure indication from its immediate neighbor? If this is true is it correct to state that fundamentally, the problem of disruption in long delay source-destination pair is not handled, but is solved by essentially reducing the said distance by having intermediate nodes storing and forwarding thereby acting as a "virtual" or "proxy" source and destinations?
 Thanks
Sitaraman


--
This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.

_______________________________________________
dtn-interest mailing list
dtn-interest@irtf.org
https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/dtn-interest