Re: [Eligibility-discuss] [Gendispatch] New Version Notification for draft-knodel-nomcom-gender-representation-00.txt
Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com> Thu, 23 November 2023 19:43 UTC
Return-Path: <ekr@rtfm.com>
X-Original-To: eligibility-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: eligibility-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8ED5C17C8A0 for <eligibility-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 23 Nov 2023 11:43:49 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.906
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.906 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=rtfm-com.20230601.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Fbso-1H7KiPQ for <eligibility-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 23 Nov 2023 11:43:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-yb1-xb32.google.com (mail-yb1-xb32.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::b32]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 89D0BC17C894 for <eligibility-discuss@ietf.org>; Thu, 23 Nov 2023 11:43:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-yb1-xb32.google.com with SMTP id 3f1490d57ef6-db3a09e96daso1073076276.3 for <eligibility-discuss@ietf.org>; Thu, 23 Nov 2023 11:43:47 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=rtfm-com.20230601.gappssmtp.com; s=20230601; t=1700768626; x=1701373426; darn=ietf.org; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=slnkt94SM21H19o3U9jf3oTHVic28N8QpBs0rwka2JU=; b=hj84CIeLr/pM01QeIOW6jINaCQFtu0/tXLELydP2mxnWEo+v4Ed/D10oratgtx9FaP Yn+blvH0gv7JH5Momd+SLL6HrYrMkUe/aWRrOLXgDLp+pvdlyX+pW95xJXTx8AE4JSn/ PrltDZP/2PId/1kc5LqjNVEgIP5HPI10DSfr/IZe6wtt4FCezwrqmFSozVDhV7yvMlkP Pb4LpjDN8148Ggr60HW4cL8inbThZUnunZWHAQ/+Ty2nhmBTDaTsfNAGOosHjM0hqMqM CjY/0K/rDy6NP2ZiROr5XEvFrwYC37XYxmTDYi78iCfvkyJsFPNk18b8pvUiJtXGXonK T0KA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1700768626; x=1701373426; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=slnkt94SM21H19o3U9jf3oTHVic28N8QpBs0rwka2JU=; b=hWBXTOMDKvKAhUOGTBZXCqZbxtR1pvU/jgfTLWZkGEr6reJDTKKW7rTTorzyImxi60 GHT08vSarK2I1uHshXvV5biQwdSELCUNlVhq7XnwPJQdnuRkqu+HzSK74CGUmLQO9uvU rlPLPGaCOewOqdQ/SUhivmYdxckRvZpji6D5nTeLxnibddU+qkaJPpPuSslEhPr92G6j KQd/ZQyjbNsm5gr1lmDgJy6wX/oqLKBtnzAhZvU/MsV3sCjHGdfH5BJNn9KW/ftib5ri Vt/J2xgu53rAmkI0HbqInqS77pLAne1M9AbFiW9bUbqgspoCr7+ZbQyIjvfKDB8Vz6+n yKVQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YzGCmijVJ43ETMtvYQQEjXihL4yQzRkDTHQxBaE2692xie4IMhC 1QZQDkZq/TZ/+WN8cH02zVMPRA24UhIqxI2yoQY7NA==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IFapc4ZhC54vrY5gT6uBGdItj2o6QeR6syddkBksI9MV/2p3aYu+UqcAlpFo5TOd+C/6yAaQ0w6GhoowcsNpek=
X-Received: by 2002:a5b:88e:0:b0:d9a:d16f:dddf with SMTP id e14-20020a5b088e000000b00d9ad16fdddfmr237090ybq.24.1700768626664; Thu, 23 Nov 2023 11:43:46 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <f871d358-8d9d-4714-99a8-6a51198a61c9@cdt.org> <5282ED25-E538-493A-A7B5-DA34CD0460ED@yahoo.com> <CALaySJ+4206AH0BoTvsLkn4LYw-TcdBFJSc0vCK6BR58QH=zfA@mail.gmail.com> <39411eb3-7947-49bf-9406-089f43ada331@nthpermutation.com> <CABcZeBN=_Lg2Hd=4QdB6c-_RN8f8b2f3So_AWAuwZGafs_Mocg@mail.gmail.com> <0a2ed545-aae3-e34e-80b4-af221b0d10f6@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <0a2ed545-aae3-e34e-80b4-af221b0d10f6@gmail.com>
From: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2023 11:43:09 -0800
Message-ID: <CABcZeBObWhkv6nLf4cO-RYpGQqz8Yu1KbxFRAYcrF2Xz57VUwA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Cc: Michael StJohns <msj@nthpermutation.com>, eligibility-discuss@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000d67f81060ad70d41"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/eligibility-discuss/WH_HaOrGB3JOLYzk37o28y_I_jU>
Subject: Re: [Eligibility-discuss] [Gendispatch] New Version Notification for draft-knodel-nomcom-gender-representation-00.txt
X-BeenThere: eligibility-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF eligibility procedures <eligibility-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/eligibility-discuss>, <mailto:eligibility-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/eligibility-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:eligibility-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:eligibility-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/eligibility-discuss>, <mailto:eligibility-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2023 19:43:49 -0000
On Thu, Nov 23, 2023 at 11:29 AM Brian E Carpenter < brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> wrote: > On 24-Nov-23 06:18, Eric Rescorla wrote: > > > > > > On Wed, Nov 22, 2023 at 10:45 PM Michael StJohns <msj@nthpermutation.com > <mailto:msj@nthpermutation.com>> wrote: > > > > > > We pick randomly, and with the exception of the 2 person per org > limit, > > any volunteer has an equal weight in being selected. If you believe > > some group is underrepresented in the pool, the solutions is to > recruit > > members of that group to volunteer. > > > > > > There are two distinct issues: > > > > 1. Whether women are sufficiently represented in the nomcom selection > pool. > > 2. Whether women are sufficiently represented in a given nomcom. > > But, over time, these issues are *not* distinct and that is why Mallory's > proposal is IMHO highly desirable: > > Having women *consistently* present in NomCom will have a subtle long > term effect, by persuading women that it's worth volunteering for NomCom. > And that will have a further long term effect in persuading women that > they should participate in the IETF (which is our underlying problem). > > This is indeed something we should have done years ago. Visible > diversity enhances diversity. > > > As Christian (and I earlier) noted, because the nomcom itself is quite > small, > > it is possible for women to be very underrepresented in a given nomcom > > with respect to the underlying pool. You may believe that's not an issue, > > but to the extent to which it is an issue, I don't think "try to get > more women > > into the pool" is a plausible response to that issue. > > What I think my argument shows is that we have a feedback loop, and > Mallory's proposal is the easiest way of inserting an amplifier in > that loop. > Hi Brian, I largely agree with your analysis here. The point I was trying to make was that even in the absence of such a feedback loop, if you think it's important to have women on the nomcom, then "let's try to get more women into the pool" is not a sufficient response. -Ekr
- Re: [Eligibility-discuss] [Gendispatch] New Versi… Salz, Rich
- Re: [Eligibility-discuss] [Gendispatch] New Versi… Barry Leiba
- Re: [Eligibility-discuss] [Gendispatch] New Versi… Michael StJohns
- Re: [Eligibility-discuss] [Gendispatch] New Versi… Eric Rescorla
- Re: [Eligibility-discuss] [Gendispatch] New Versi… Michael StJohns
- Re: [Eligibility-discuss] [Gendispatch] New Versi… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [Eligibility-discuss] [Gendispatch] New Versi… Eric Rescorla
- Re: [Eligibility-discuss] [Gendispatch] New Versi… Christian Huitema
- Re: [Eligibility-discuss] [Gendispatch] New Versi… Vittorio Bertola
- Re: [Eligibility-discuss] [Gendispatch] New Versi… Salz, Rich
- Re: [Eligibility-discuss] [Gendispatch] New Versi… Michael StJohns
- Re: [Eligibility-discuss] [Gendispatch] New Versi… Martin Thomson
- Re: [Eligibility-discuss] [Gendispatch] New Versi… Salz, Rich
- Re: [Eligibility-discuss] [Gendispatch] New Versi… Michael Richardson
- Re: [Eligibility-discuss] [Gendispatch] New Versi… Michael StJohns
- Re: [Eligibility-discuss] [Gendispatch] New Versi… Ted Lemon
- Re: [Eligibility-discuss] [Gendispatch] New Versi… Andrew Sullivan
- Re: [Eligibility-discuss] [Gendispatch] New Versi… Michael StJohns
- Re: [Eligibility-discuss] Size of nomcom (Re: [Ge… Michael StJohns
- Re: [Eligibility-discuss] [Gendispatch] New Versi… Mallory Knodel
- Re: [Eligibility-discuss] [Gendispatch] New Versi… Ted Lemon
- Re: [Eligibility-discuss] [Gendispatch] New Versi… Michael StJohns
- [Eligibility-discuss] Size of nomcom (Re: [Gendis… Harald Alvestrand
- Re: [Eligibility-discuss] [Gendispatch] New Versi… Ted Lemon
- Re: [Eligibility-discuss] [Gendispatch] New Versi… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [Eligibility-discuss] [Gendispatch] New Versi… Michael StJohns
- Re: [Eligibility-discuss] [Gendispatch] New Versi… Michael Richardson
- [Eligibility-discuss] Exhausted pool [draft-knode… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [Eligibility-discuss] Exhausted pool [draft-k… Michael StJohns
- Re: [Eligibility-discuss] Exhausted pool [draft-k… Michael Richardson
- Re: [Eligibility-discuss] Exhausted pool [draft-k… Mallory Knodel
- Re: [Eligibility-discuss] [Gendispatch] New Versi… S Moonesamy
- Re: [Eligibility-discuss] [Gendispatch] New Versi… Stephen Farrell
- Re: [Eligibility-discuss] [Gendispatch] New Versi… Brian E Carpenter
- [Eligibility-discuss] Social norm (was: [Gendispa… S Moonesamy