Re: [Emu] IANA allocation issue in EAP-FAST Documents
Bernard Aboba <bernarda@windows.microsoft.com> Wed, 04 February 2009 21:19 UTC
Return-Path: <bernarda@windows.microsoft.com>
X-Original-To: emu@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: emu@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C329D3A6832 for <emu@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 Feb 2009 13:19:50 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -109.373
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-109.373 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.225, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id oEn0CEKtK3BW for <emu@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 Feb 2009 13:19:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp.microsoft.com (mail1.microsoft.com [131.107.115.212]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1A093A698C for <emu@ietf.org>; Wed, 4 Feb 2009 13:19:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: from TK5-EXHUB-C102.redmond.corp.microsoft.com (157.54.18.53) by TK5-EXGWY-E801.partners.extranet.microsoft.com (10.251.56.50) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.2.99.4; Wed, 4 Feb 2009 13:19:20 -0800
Received: from tk5-exmlt-w601.wingroup.windeploy.ntdev.microsoft.com (157.54.18.32) by TK5-EXHUB-C102.redmond.corp.microsoft.com (157.54.18.53) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 8.2.99.4; Wed, 4 Feb 2009 13:19:20 -0800
Received: from NA-EXMSG-W601.wingroup.windeploy.ntdev.microsoft.com ([fe80::75be:c82f:ae04:55bf]) by tk5-exmlt-w601.wingroup.windeploy.ntdev.microsoft.com ([157.54.18.32]) with mapi; Wed, 4 Feb 2009 13:20:49 -0800
From: Bernard Aboba <bernarda@windows.microsoft.com>
To: "emu@ietf.org" <emu@ietf.org>
Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2009 13:19:04 -0800
Thread-Topic: IANA allocation issue in EAP-FAST Documents
Thread-Index: AcmHDPGhDtdqMsPaT++CTA72hptm2AAAKZ+w
Message-ID: <2828BDE8DC61004E8104C78E82A0B39713F1D62D97@NA-EXMSG-W601.wingroup.windeploy.ntdev.microsoft.com>
References: <BLU137-W531ACB9BE00127DB8595D993C30@phx.gbl> <bc4003aaf07c34543e6c57a477240728.squirrel@www.trepanning.net> <BLU137-W5B91C637F3D0C1BFEC34A93C30@phx.gbl>
In-Reply-To: <BLU137-W5B91C637F3D0C1BFEC34A93C30@phx.gbl>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_2828BDE8DC61004E8104C78E82A0B39713F1D62D97NAEXMSGW601wi_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 21:23:33 -0800
Subject: Re: [Emu] IANA allocation issue in EAP-FAST Documents
X-BeenThere: emu@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "EAP Methods Update \(EMU\)" <emu.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/emu>, <mailto:emu-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/emu>
List-Post: <mailto:emu@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emu-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/emu>, <mailto:emu-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2009 21:19:50 -0000
Dan Harkins said: > draft-cam-winget-eap-fast-provisioning claims a reference to RFC 5226 > but nowhere in that RFC can I find description of the following label > for an initial assignment of repository values: > > "allocated for management by Cisco" > > yet the draft instructs IANA to set aside values 11-63 for just that > purpose. I think that's very inappropriate. Not only is it telling IANA > to cede some of its authority to a large multinational corporation but > it is decidedly *NOT* documenting existing use! If this whole exercise > is to document existing use then where are the specifications for these > PAC attribute types? It would appear that the registry of "EAP-FAST PAC Attribute Types" relates to a Standard Track document, RFC 4507, although the document itself doesn't indicate that it updates RFC 4507. RFC 5226 does permit vendor-specific registries, although it is somewhat odd to enable vendor extensions for only one vendor, particularly if this does relate to an IETF standards track document (which would imply IETF change control, no?)
- Re: [Emu] Potential Notes in EAP-FAST Documents Jari Arkko
- [Emu] Potential Notes in EAP-FAST Documents The IESG
- Re: [Emu] Potential Notes in EAP-FAST Documents Chris Hessing
- Re: [Emu] Potential Notes in EAP-FAST Documents Glen Zorn
- Re: [Emu] Potential Notes in EAP-FAST Documents Dorothy Stanley
- Re: [Emu] Potential Notes in EAP-FAST Documents David Mitton
- Re: [Emu] Potential Notes in EAP-FAST Documents Dan Harkins
- Re: [Emu] Potential Notes in EAP-FAST Documents Hao Zhou (hzhou)
- Re: [Emu] Potential Notes in EAP-FAST Documents Glen Zorn
- Re: [Emu] Potential Notes in EAP-FAST Documents Bernard Aboba
- Re: [Emu] Potential Notes in EAP-FAST Documents Glen Zorn
- Re: [Emu] Potential Notes in EAP-FAST Documents Pasi.Eronen
- Re: [Emu] Potential Notes in EAP-FAST Documents Jari Arkko
- Re: [Emu] Potential Notes in EAP-FAST Documents Dan Harkins
- Re: [Emu] Potential Notes in EAP-FAST Documents Pasi.Eronen
- Re: [Emu] Potential Notes in EAP-FAST Documents Jari Arkko
- Re: [Emu] Potential Notes in EAP-FAST Documents Dan Harkins
- Re: [Emu] Potential Notes in EAP-FAST Documents Glen Zorn
- Re: [Emu] Potential Notes in EAP-FAST Documents Glen Zorn
- Re: [Emu] Potential Notes in EAP-FAST Documents Pasi.Eronen
- Re: [Emu] Potential Notes in EAP-FAST Documents Pasi.Eronen
- Re: [Emu] Potential Notes in EAP-FAST Documents Glen Zorn
- Re: [Emu] Potential Notes in EAP-FAST Documents Dan Harkins
- Re: [Emu] Potential Notes in EAP-FAST Documents Nancy Cam-Winget (ncamwing)
- Re: [Emu] Potential Notes in EAP-FAST Documents Glen Zorn
- Re: [Emu] Potential Notes in EAP-FAST Documents Glen Zorn
- Re: [Emu] Potential Notes in EAP-FAST Documents Yoshihiro Ohba
- Re: [Emu] Potential Notes in EAP-FAST Documents Tim Polk
- Re: [Emu] Potential Notes in EAP-FAST Documents gabriel montenegro
- Re: [Emu] Potential Notes in EAP-FAST Documents Bernard Aboba
- Re: [Emu] Potential Notes in EAP-FAST Documents Jouni Malinen
- Re: [Emu] Potential Notes in EAP-FAST Documents Glen Zorn
- Re: [Emu] Potential Notes in EAP-FAST Documents Hao Zhou (hzhou)
- Re: [Emu] IANA allocation issue in EAP-FAST Docum… Bernard Aboba
- Re: [Emu] IANA allocation issue in EAP-FAST Docum… Glen Zorn
- Re: [Emu] IANA allocation issue in EAP-FAST Docum… Dan Harkins
- Re: [Emu] IANA allocation issue in EAP-FAST Docum… Dan Harkins
- Re: [Emu] Potential Notes in EAP-FAST Documents Jouni Malinen
- Re: [Emu] Potential Notes in EAP-FAST Documents Tim Polk
- Re: [Emu] Potential Notes in EAP-FAST Documents Glen Zorn