IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Fwd: [Forces-protocol] Presentation of the options forLFB-level multicast]

"Weiming Wang" <wmwang@mail.hzic.edu.cn> Sat, 06 November 2004 14:00 UTC

Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id JAA08721 for <forces-protocol-web-archive@ietf.org>; Sat, 6 Nov 2004 09:00:46 -0500 (EST)
Received: from megatron.ietf.org ([132.151.6.71]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CQR7h-0007JI-55 for forces-protocol-web-archive@ietf.org; Sat, 06 Nov 2004 09:00:57 -0500
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1CQR6Y-0004uM-D9; Sat, 06 Nov 2004 08:59:46 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1CQR3a-0004cD-JS for forces-protocol@megatron.ietf.org; Sat, 06 Nov 2004 08:56:42 -0500
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id IAA08348 for <forces-protocol@ietf.org>; Sat, 6 Nov 2004 08:56:40 -0500 (EST)
Received: from [202.96.99.56] (helo=202.96.99.56) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with smtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CQR3O-0007Ea-2z for forces-protocol@ietf.org; Sat, 06 Nov 2004 08:56:51 -0500
Received: from [202.96.99.59] by 202.96.99.56 with StormMail ESMTP id 58110.341813895; Sat, 6 Nov 2004 22:18:25 +0800 (CST)
Received: from wwm1 (unverified [219.82.170.89]) by mail.gsu.cn (Rockliffe SMTPRA 6.0.11) with ESMTP id <B0000103060@mail.gsu.cn>; Sat, 6 Nov 2004 21:58:48 +0800
Message-ID: <005101c4c408$dc341600$020aa8c0@wwm1>
From: Weiming Wang <wmwang@mail.hzic.edu.cn>
To: hadi@znyx.com, forces-protocol@ietf.org
References: <4189F776.4080306@zurich.ibm.com> <1099700691.1038.2.camel@jzny.localdomain>
Subject: Re: [Fwd: [Forces-protocol] Presentation of the options forLFB-level multicast]
Date: Sat, 06 Nov 2004 21:59:22 +0800
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106
X-Spam-Score: 0.4 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 9466e0365fc95844abaf7c3f15a05c7d
Cc: "Khosravi, Hormuzd M" <hormuzd.m.khosravi@intel.com>, "(Ram Gopal )" <ram.gopal@nokia.com>, Avri Doria <avri@acm.org>, Dong Ligang <donglg@mail.hzic.edu.cn>, Robert Haas <rha@zurich.ibm.com>
X-BeenThere: forces-protocol@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: forces-protocol <forces-protocol.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/forces-protocol>, <mailto:forces-protocol-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/forces-protocol>
List-Post: <mailto:forces-protocol@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:forces-protocol-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/forces-protocol>, <mailto:forces-protocol-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: forces-protocol-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: forces-protocol-bounces@ietf.org
X-Spam-Score: 0.4 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 97adf591118a232206bdb5a27b217034

Hi Jamal,

I hope the discussion on the path can be summarized your the presentation.
Obviously it is an important issue, actually I think the issue spent most of our
time discussing on since last IETF meeting.

Another is I hope you can add a few words on the LFB multicast when you talk
about the protocol grammar where LFB addressign format is included, so as to be
consistent with Robert's presentation.

Cheers,
Weiming

----- Original Message -----
From: "Jamal Hadi Salim" <hadi@znyx.com>
> Robert,
> I saw your presentation. Looks fine. Apologies, havent had time to work
> on the protocol one. I am trying not to have too many slides.
> Heres a start that i will refine later.
> I was trying to build upto a point where i could explain the different
> views of "path" - I will still do that if theres
> a) view i should  or b) time allows it
>
> cheers,
> jamal
>
>



_______________________________________________
Forces-protocol mailing list
Forces-protocol@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/forces-protocol

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email