Re: [Gendispatch] I-D Action: draft-eggert-bcp45bis-01.txt

Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> Tue, 30 March 2021 07:05 UTC

Return-Path: <mnot@mnot.net>
X-Original-To: gendispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gendispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 155573A0C8F for <gendispatch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 30 Mar 2021 00:05:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.12
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.12 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=mnot.net header.b=Zdt5me1V; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=N/qx3+A6
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nm9k9wOFvp8I for <gendispatch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 30 Mar 2021 00:05:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from wout3-smtp.messagingengine.com (wout3-smtp.messagingengine.com [64.147.123.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 214C53A0C8A for <gendispatch@ietf.org>; Tue, 30 Mar 2021 00:05:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from compute2.internal (compute2.nyi.internal [10.202.2.42]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 787191AB3; Tue, 30 Mar 2021 03:05:15 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute2.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 30 Mar 2021 03:05:15 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mnot.net; h= content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; s=fm2; bh=Z USC+/fTU6F47QEnZydMo30vs2wdIE/emGfCH/tl+eU=; b=Zdt5me1V3CvJbFrRk 6uxM73TLOh7M21SRDNHMOmkFS8gbkYs1AR2DNIn1bso1P/yagsGEWWSjBU/O10Yf 3BSlg+yxwMZOtE6/audXjiwVQdYyYH+eHzpLu7iXap/o3wPngMQzmy02Ka3R50KM 21/AyM18/bO6pw92o+Se2CfK/jD6FmcKyliAA+0vYu0dXMurY5I26e391L4qX83r o7s+ce2dCw0MGMzpdkI/IR5EbJm+pbdvaWo7cCyhbAEYfw+sN+mcs/Z36FKe1A1t KGRhWxTtvCKPBuAtWJvqFxdebadOtPh5MQ130be66dUkxpfO5yWhGGPyE98ZQUyD F1UCQ==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=ZUSC+/fTU6F47QEnZydMo30vs2wdIE/emGfCH/tl+ eU=; b=N/qx3+A6G3HPlGjQWzLl02MvG7zsnAjmDCgdsgPqWVyH8tHABXxLFP6Nr b76MkouS6tne5JZEFTgzztrGAHrjLHFNspM+vcYXbSWF17BQpffqVRyQ0HbOrjV5 +UVA8ZsHSUlv+WGvF8f0OeAMifNBbyz0KVLVeYD12iJhmhqygwwm/hW/fDyUam3v JLkdXrrY6i8+yTEPQe69ZNSwzH32+ImbgBMw0CZD+VFwGJx0iMAHssAR8CYFXvIT fDYKIoWqXGZwHuyXA6LW80ROQIdSyNFnJ5YFN+0QMu5m//YZwzi4LGsyD0zJHzsQ Jf8wqy9cfv+FaYFl9Ka9E6CFI9tkA==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:qc1iYMSeVp441xGadD9h1fzihnmtcDMNuu9rBoMhArseWF0LgC9FAg> <xme:qc1iYJzNK9pj908O6sYzqR3LcYUIkBJCkGCYnu2sD34RI-jJT4xKRE3ZqRIrLlznG kYFQhmYi-BJ_4IMHg>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduledrudehledguddukecutefuodetggdotefrod ftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfgh necuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmd enucfjughrpegtggfuhfgjfffgkfhfvffosehtqhhmtdhhtddvnecuhfhrohhmpeforghr khcupfhothhtihhnghhhrghmuceomhhnohhtsehmnhhothdrnhgvtheqnecuggftrfgrth htvghrnhepvefffffhudetveevhfeuffeigedtuedtheffleetffeftddtgeegjeehieeu teetnecuffhomhgrihhnpehmnhhothdrnhgvthenucfkphepudduledrudejrdduheekrd dvhedunecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhep mhhnohhtsehmnhhothdrnhgvth
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:qc1iYJ0LkQo0Ff6_o3rqmTw7JtuoZCamBK_B37ueV8VzGH5i10ovlA> <xmx:qc1iYABs0O_emlwCtmcn1EUqgx6m1Ky0q-Y24xbYZQ-F5C5knkfzWg> <xmx:qc1iYFjACSnymDCBftPGMsNCVdJKdNIZdkZ7ipPn-LekQphgaWrhjw> <xmx:q81iYKum9Wl6EdnSvbnTGeIYCSScM2ScIJWALfa5fL0xx7X8ea_jdg>
Received: from [192.168.7.30] (119-17-158-251.77119e.mel.static.aussiebb.net [119.17.158.251]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id C917F240054; Tue, 30 Mar 2021 03:05:11 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 14.0 \(3654.60.0.2.21\))
From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
In-Reply-To: <D277EB6F-FDB1-4588-A77B-FC29B0FB782F@eggert.org>
Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2021 18:05:06 +1100
Cc: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>, gendispatch@ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <963ED8F3-712F-4E8D-BF29-A3E7735E4641@mnot.net>
References: <161701910454.13044.908232164554537032@ietfa.amsl.com> <55b4e061-f25d-8958-1e75-868bec0c735e@gmail.com> <D277EB6F-FDB1-4588-A77B-FC29B0FB782F@eggert.org>
To: Lars Eggert <lars@eggert.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3654.60.0.2.21)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gendispatch/JiQKMoyYDL7igF2BUX_23GzdLAs>
Subject: Re: [Gendispatch] I-D Action: draft-eggert-bcp45bis-01.txt
X-BeenThere: gendispatch@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: General Area Dispatch <gendispatch.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gendispatch>, <mailto:gendispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gendispatch/>
List-Post: <mailto:gendispatch@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gendispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gendispatch>, <mailto:gendispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2021 07:05:25 -0000

On 2021-3-29, at 22:59, Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> *  Questions and clarifications concerning IETF meetings, although
>> most of these topics are better brought up on the discussion list
>> for IETF LLC administrative issues [ADMIN-DISCUSS] or the attendee
>> discussion list for a given IETF meeting, such as
>> [IETF110-ATTENDEES] for IETF-110.
> 
> However, since not everybody attends IETF meetings, and therefore
> not everybody is on the attendee lists, we should be clear that
> messages like "we are going to discuss the very interesting topic X
> at the next IETF meeting" do IMHO still belong on the IETF list. The
> previous bullet in the draft already says this, but maybe we could
> reove any doubt by having this bullet start:
> 
> * Questions and clarifications concerning practical aspects of IETF meetings...


If the intent is to makes sure that people are aware of relevant discussions, even if they're not on one of the attendee lists (and I usually decline that), it might be better to use ietf-announce@ -- e.g., in a "rollup" e-mail before the meeting, where submissions are solicited ahead of time. Or with an open calendar / wiki space (we rely on e-mail to much for stateful things anyway).

Again, ietf@ should _not_ be the default place for announcing things. It is a subset of the community.

Cheers,


--
Mark Nottingham   https://www.mnot.net/