IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Hipsec] Status of WG items

"Henderson, Thomas R" <thomas.r.henderson@boeing.com> Mon, 09 July 2012 16:10 UTC

Return-Path: <thomas.r.henderson@boeing.com>
X-Original-To: hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FB0D21F85CD for <hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Jul 2012 09:10:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.545
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.545 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.054, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JMYhSirJaXst for <hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Jul 2012 09:10:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from slb-mbsout-02.boeing.com (slb-mbsout-02.boeing.com [130.76.64.129]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 903C721F85C7 for <hipsec@ietf.org>; Mon, 9 Jul 2012 09:10:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from slb-mbsout-02.boeing.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by slb-mbsout-02.boeing.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/DOWNSTREAM_MBSOUT) with ESMTP id q69GAesQ028159 for <hipsec@ietf.org>; Mon, 9 Jul 2012 09:10:40 -0700
Received: from slb-av-01.boeing.com (slb-av-01.boeing.com [129.172.128.218]) by slb-mbsout-02.boeing.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/UPSTREAM_MBSOUT) with ESMTP id q69GAdPD028153 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Mon, 9 Jul 2012 09:10:39 -0700
Received: from slb-av-01.boeing.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by slb-av-01.boeing.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/DOWNSTREAM_RELAY) with ESMTP id q69GAeLZ032597; Mon, 9 Jul 2012 09:10:40 -0700
Received: from XCH-NWHT-05.nw.nos.boeing.com (xch-nwht-05.nw.nos.boeing.com [130.247.25.109]) by slb-av-01.boeing.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/UPSTREAM_RELAY) with ESMTP id q69GAdRB032564 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5 bits=128 verify=OK); Mon, 9 Jul 2012 09:10:40 -0700
Received: from XCH-NW-16V.nw.nos.boeing.com ([130.247.25.238]) by XCH-NWHT-05.nw.nos.boeing.com ([130.247.25.109]) with mapi; Mon, 9 Jul 2012 09:10:39 -0700
From: "Henderson, Thomas R" <thomas.r.henderson@boeing.com>
To: 'Julien Laganier' <julien.ietf@gmail.com>, Tobias Heer <heer@cs.rwth-aachen.de>
Date: Mon, 09 Jul 2012 09:10:39 -0700
Thread-Topic: [Hipsec] Status of WG items
Thread-Index: Ac1bD47vRms7PXPLRqCsjzNuEVfLRQC3K5iA
Message-ID: <758141CC3D829043A8C3164DD3D593EA1BD324E170@XCH-NW-16V.nw.nos.boeing.com>
References: <4FE96F9F.3090800@ericsson.com> <758141CC3D829043A8C3164DD3D593EA1BD324E110@XCH-NW-16V.nw.nos.boeing.com> <4FEA1876.900@cs.rwth-aachen.de> <CAE_dhjveQ6WVVE3BVKk2txfBxNhfWvjbz+QVU2P919dNZ1WO4A@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAE_dhjveQ6WVVE3BVKk2txfBxNhfWvjbz+QVU2P919dNZ1WO4A@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-TM-AS-MML: No
Cc: "hipsec@ietf.org" <hipsec@ietf.org>, Julien Laganier <julien.laganier@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Hipsec] Status of WG items
X-BeenThere: hipsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the official IETF Mailing List for the HIP Working Group." <hipsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/hipsec>, <mailto:hipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/hipsec>
List-Post: <mailto:hipsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec>, <mailto:hipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Jul 2012 16:10:17 -0000

> -----Original Message-----
> From: hipsec-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:hipsec-bounces@ietf.org] On
> Behalf Of Julien Laganier
> Sent: Thursday, July 05, 2012 5:38 PM
> To: Tobias Heer
> Cc: hipsec@ietf.org; Julien Laganier
> Subject: Re: [Hipsec] Status of WG items
> 
> Hi everyone,
> 
> Sorry for the delay.
> 
> Here's an update from my side:
> 
> - 4843bis (ORCHIDv2) is ready for WGLC as soon as I incorporate the
> update ORCHIDv2 generation algorithm. I will do this ASAP
> - 5203bis (registration) can IMHO be republished as is as I haven't
> seen any issue with the original version. If people agree I could
> republish it and we could WGLC it...

I had a read of this document and agree with your suggestion to move it forward with this initial set (as it provides no technical changes from RFC 5203).

> - 5204bis (rendezvous) needs one more subsection regarding relaying of
> the UPDATE packet to support double jump of mobile nodes. As this isn't
> really useful without the mobility support my proposal is to tackle
> this one together with the 5206bis.

+1.  I'll post a refresh of 5206bis before the meeting cutoff.  A refresh of 5204bis (as well as 5205bis) would also be appropriate.

- Tom

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email