Re: [Hipsec] Status of WG items

Tobias Heer <heer@cs.rwth-aachen.de> Tue, 26 June 2012 20:15 UTC

Return-Path: <heer@informatik.rwth-aachen.de>
X-Original-To: hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DFA611E80DC for <hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 26 Jun 2012 13:15:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.249
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.249 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_DE=0.35, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pMwnVovMMQYh for <hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 26 Jun 2012 13:15:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mta-2.ms.rz.rwth-aachen.de (mta-2.ms.rz.rwth-aachen.de [134.130.7.73]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8886411E80E0 for <hipsec@ietf.org>; Tue, 26 Jun 2012 13:15:49 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
Content-type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Received: from mx-out-2.rwth-aachen.de ([134.130.5.187]) by mta-2.ms.rz.RWTH-Aachen.de (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 6.3-7.04 (built Sep 26 2008)) with ESMTP id <0M6800EM9QYAO3G0@mta-2.ms.rz.RWTH-Aachen.de> for hipsec@ietf.org; Tue, 26 Jun 2012 22:15:46 +0200 (CEST)
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.77,480,1336341600"; d="scan'208";a="94327634"
Received: from relay-auth-1.ms.rz.rwth-aachen.de (HELO relay-auth-1) ([134.130.7.78]) by mx-2.rz.rwth-aachen.de with ESMTP; Tue, 26 Jun 2012 22:15:46 +0200
Received: from [192.168.1.100] ([unknown] [77.2.94.181]) by relay-auth-1.ms.rz.rwth-aachen.de (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 7.0-3.01 64bit (built Dec 9 2008)) with ESMTPA id <0M68003NMQY9W330@relay-auth-1.ms.rz.rwth-aachen.de> for hipsec@ietf.org; Tue, 26 Jun 2012 22:15:46 +0200 (CEST)
Message-id: <4FEA1876.900@cs.rwth-aachen.de>
Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2012 22:15:50 +0200
From: Tobias Heer <heer@cs.rwth-aachen.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120430 Thunderbird/12.0.1
To: hipsec@ietf.org
References: <4FE96F9F.3090800@ericsson.com> <758141CC3D829043A8C3164DD3D593EA1BD324E110@XCH-NW-16V.nw.nos.boeing.com>
In-reply-to: <758141CC3D829043A8C3164DD3D593EA1BD324E110@XCH-NW-16V.nw.nos.boeing.com>
Cc: Julien Laganier <julien.laganier@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Hipsec] Status of WG items
X-BeenThere: hipsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the official IETF Mailing List for the HIP Working Group." <hipsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/hipsec>, <mailto:hipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/hipsec>
List-Post: <mailto:hipsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec>, <mailto:hipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2012 20:15:50 -0000

Hi,

Am 26.06.2012 20:06, schrieb Henderson, Thomas R:
> Gonzalo,
>
> I'm the editor of 5206-bis (mobility), which recently expired.  There are 13 issues in the tracker, and I've been letting them sit for now in an effort to get the first batch of WG documents ready for WGLC (namely, 4423, 4843, 5201, and 5202).  I'll turn my attention back to 5206-bis open issues once we get at least 4843, 5201, and 5202 done.
>
> I'm also a co-author on 5201-bis.  We have only three open issues on that draft, one of which is to align 4843-bis with 5201-bis, and the other two pertaining to some cryptography issues that seem close to being resolved.  I will post some suggested text to the list for these two items.
>
I agree with Tom. Only few issues remain for 5201-bis. All comments from 
the reviewers have been adressed and we are really close to finalizing 
the document.

What remains open are the changes to the ORCHID document. Without these 
changes, 5201-bis is incomplete. However, these are minor changes and 
Julien already suggested text on the list. Therefore, I believe he can 
do these changes quickly.

Tobias

> I believe that we are close now to being able to request a WGLC on 4843, 5201, and 5202 bis documents, and I'd like to see that happen before the Vancouver meeting.
>
> - Tom
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: hipsec-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:hipsec-bounces@ietf.org] On
>> Behalf Of Gonzalo Camarillo
>> Sent: Tuesday, June 26, 2012 1:15 AM
>> To: HIP
>> Subject: [Hipsec] Status of WG items
>>
>> Folks,
>>
>> the list has been relatively quiet lately and the energy within this WG
>> has also been quite low in general in the last months. Could the
>> editors of all our WG items please let this mailing list know what the
>> status of each document is and what the next steps are?
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Gonzalo
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Hipsec mailing list
>> Hipsec@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec
> _______________________________________________
> Hipsec mailing list
> Hipsec@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec