IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Hipsec] Fwd: Status of WG items

Ari Keranen <ari.keranen@nomadiclab.com> Mon, 17 December 2012 08:41 UTC

Return-Path: <ari.keranen@nomadiclab.com>
X-Original-To: hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 918ED21F8A46 for <hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 17 Dec 2012 00:41:24 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jq1DCjsec4vv for <hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 17 Dec 2012 00:41:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: from gw.nomadiclab.com (unknown [IPv6:2001:14b8:400:101::2]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F114F21F89B6 for <hipsec@ietf.org>; Mon, 17 Dec 2012 00:41:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gw.nomadiclab.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 089644E6F7; Mon, 17 Dec 2012 10:41:19 +0200 (EET)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at nomadiclab.com
Received: from gw.nomadiclab.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (inside.nomadiclab.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LT5AdhI-MX6H; Mon, 17 Dec 2012 10:41:14 +0200 (EET)
Received: from tri62.nomadiclab.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by gw.nomadiclab.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A45184E6ED; Mon, 17 Dec 2012 10:41:14 +0200 (EET)
Message-ID: <50CEDAAA.1000401@nomadiclab.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2012 10:41:14 +0200
From: Ari Keranen <ari.keranen@nomadiclab.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:14.0) Gecko/20120713 Thunderbird/14.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Samu Varjonen <samu.varjonen@hiit.fi>, Julien Laganier <julien.ietf@gmail.com>
References: <4FE96F9F.3090800@ericsson.com> <758141CC3D829043A8C3164DD3D593EA1BD324E110@XCH-NW-16V.nw.nos.boeing.com> <4FEA1876.900@cs.rwth-aachen.de> <CAE_dhjveQ6WVVE3BVKk2txfBxNhfWvjbz+QVU2P919dNZ1WO4A@mail.gmail.com> <5012C05B.6080203@nomadiclab.com> <CAE_dhjufW+ic-VaBtqs787jK=xxy_XxnegpgGEtmpjZHsmJ4nA@mail.gmail.com> <505C213F.6050701@ericsson.com> <CAE_dhjv8LRwurQ9QmCmh6Spa+1UuECk1farGAKf_o9gYVsy_Lg@mail.gmail.com> <CAE_dhjsUXVwY8vXNLCwUjXPV9SxHTDbhk4dCt+ffQuQN=a6CMw@mail.gmail.com> <50615C93.6090300@ericsson.com> <5080010B.7030605@cs.hut.fi> <50CB264A.7030403@nomadiclab.com> <758141CC3D829043A8C3164DD3D593EA2E4D5DDEE7@XCH-NW-16V.nw.nos.boeing.com> <50CC2BEB.1030709@cs.hut.fi> <50CC5390.40707@hiit.fi>
In-Reply-To: <50CC5390.40707@hiit.fi>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: "hipsec@ietf.org" <hipsec@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Hipsec] Fwd: Status of WG items
X-BeenThere: hipsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the official IETF Mailing List for the HIP Working Group." <hipsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/hipsec>, <mailto:hipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/hipsec>
List-Post: <mailto:hipsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec>, <mailto:hipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2012 08:41:24 -0000

On 12/15/12 12:40 PM, Samu Varjonen wrote:
> 15.12.2012 9:51, Miika Komu kirjoitti:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 12/15/2012 09:40 AM, Henderson, Thomas R wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: hipsec-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:hipsec-bounces@ietf.org] On
>>>> Behalf Of Ari Keranen
>>>> Sent: Friday, December 14, 2012 5:15 AM
>>>> To: hipsec@ietf.org
>>>> Subject: Re: [Hipsec] Fwd: Status of WG items
>>>>
>>>> Or we can do this.
>>>>
>>>> However, I would not be too concerned for the CERT draft blocking the
>>>> reg draft given that the CERT draft should not require much (any?)
>>>> changes for STD track. Of course that would need someone driving that
>>>> work too.
>>>>
>>>> If there's not enough interest for that work (I think it's important
>>>> but don't have the cycles to do it myself), it makes sense to go
>>>> forward as proposed below.
>>>
>>> I agree with the above.  I would support carrying them forward as is
>>> and trying to publish together, but if the authors prefer to decouple,
>>> I would be fine with that approach.
>>
>> I would also suggest pushing CERT draft to the standards track if the
>> authors can contribute some cycles.
>
> I can contribute some cycles.

Excellent, thanks Samu!

Julien, if we can get CERT moving, do you agree that this way forward 
makes sense?


Cheers,
Ari

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email