Re: [Hipsec] Status of WG items

Hi everyone,

Sorry for the delay.

Here's an update from my side:

- 4843bis (ORCHIDv2) is ready for WGLC as soon as I incorporate the
update ORCHIDv2 generation algorithm. I will do this ASAP
- 5203bis (registration) can IMHO be republished as is as I haven't
seen any issue with the original version. If people agree I could
republish it and we could WGLC it...
- 5204bis (rendezvous) needs one more subsection regarding relaying of
the UPDATE packet to support double jump of mobile nodes. As this
isn't really useful without the mobility support my proposal is to
tackle this one together with the 5206bis.
-5205bis (DNS support) lacks a DNS RR format for ECC support as per
5201bis, and we also need to make sure the new ORCHIDv2 support has no
implications on the DNS RR format. Work in progress...

Comments?

--julien

On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 1:15 PM, Tobias Heer <heer@cs.rwth-aachen.de> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Am 26.06.2012 20:06, schrieb Henderson, Thomas R:
>
>> Gonzalo,
>>
>> I'm the editor of 5206-bis (mobility), which recently expired.  There are
>> 13 issues in the tracker, and I've been letting them sit for now in an
>> effort to get the first batch of WG documents ready for WGLC (namely, 4423,
>> 4843, 5201, and 5202).  I'll turn my attention back to 5206-bis open issues
>> once we get at least 4843, 5201, and 5202 done.
>>
>> I'm also a co-author on 5201-bis.  We have only three open issues on that
>> draft, one of which is to align 4843-bis with 5201-bis, and the other two
>> pertaining to some cryptography issues that seem close to being resolved.  I
>> will post some suggested text to the list for these two items.
>>
> I agree with Tom. Only few issues remain for 5201-bis. All comments from the
> reviewers have been adressed and we are really close to finalizing the
> document.
>
> What remains open are the changes to the ORCHID document. Without these
> changes, 5201-bis is incomplete. However, these are minor changes and Julien
> already suggested text on the list. Therefore, I believe he can do these
> changes quickly.
>
> Tobias
>
>
>> I believe that we are close now to being able to request a WGLC on 4843,
>> 5201, and 5202 bis documents, and I'd like to see that happen before the
>> Vancouver meeting.
>>
>> - Tom
>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: hipsec-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:hipsec-bounces@ietf.org] On
>>> Behalf Of Gonzalo Camarillo
>>> Sent: Tuesday, June 26, 2012 1:15 AM
>>> To: HIP
>>> Subject: [Hipsec] Status of WG items
>>>
>>> Folks,
>>>
>>> the list has been relatively quiet lately and the energy within this WG
>>> has also been quite low in general in the last months. Could the
>>> editors of all our WG items please let this mailing list know what the
>>> status of each document is and what the next steps are?
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> Gonzalo
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Hipsec mailing list
>>> Hipsec@ietf.org
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Hipsec mailing list
>> Hipsec@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Hipsec mailing list
> Hipsec@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec