IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Hipsec] Fwd: Status of WG items

Miika Komu <mkomu@cs.hut.fi> Sat, 15 December 2012 07:51 UTC

Return-Path: <mkomu@cs.hut.fi>
X-Original-To: hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7480321F8945 for <hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 14 Dec 2012 23:51:10 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 10TdsMgmmlW9 for <hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 14 Dec 2012 23:51:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.cs.hut.fi (mail.cs.hut.fi [130.233.192.7]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCC3021F88C8 for <hipsec@ietf.org>; Fri, 14 Dec 2012 23:51:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (hutcs.cs.hut.fi [130.233.192.10]) by mail.cs.hut.fi (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4AB993087D6; Sat, 15 Dec 2012 09:51:08 +0200 (EET)
Message-ID: <50CC2BEB.1030709@cs.hut.fi>
Date: Sat, 15 Dec 2012 09:51:07 +0200
From: Miika Komu <mkomu@cs.hut.fi>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: hipsec@ietf.org, Varjonen Samu <samu.varjonen@helsinki.fi>
References: <4FE96F9F.3090800@ericsson.com> <758141CC3D829043A8C3164DD3D593EA1BD324E110@XCH-NW-16V.nw.nos.boeing.com> <4FEA1876.900@cs.rwth-aachen.de> <CAE_dhjveQ6WVVE3BVKk2txfBxNhfWvjbz+QVU2P919dNZ1WO4A@mail.gmail.com> <5012C05B.6080203@nomadiclab.com> <CAE_dhjufW+ic-VaBtqs787jK=xxy_XxnegpgGEtmpjZHsmJ4nA@mail.gmail.com> <505C213F.6050701@ericsson.com> <CAE_dhjv8LRwurQ9QmCmh6Spa+1UuECk1farGAKf_o9gYVsy_Lg@mail.gmail.com> <CAE_dhjsUXVwY8vXNLCwUjXPV9SxHTDbhk4dCt+ffQuQN=a6CMw@mail.gmail.com> <50615C93.6090300@ericsson.com> <5080010B.7030605@cs.hut.fi> <50CB264A.7030403@nomadiclab.com> <758141CC3D829043A8C3164DD3D593EA2E4D5DDEE7@XCH-NW-16V.nw.nos.boeing.com>
In-Reply-To: <758141CC3D829043A8C3164DD3D593EA2E4D5DDEE7@XCH-NW-16V.nw.nos.boeing.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [Hipsec] Fwd: Status of WG items
X-BeenThere: hipsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the official IETF Mailing List for the HIP Working Group." <hipsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/hipsec>, <mailto:hipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/hipsec>
List-Post: <mailto:hipsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec>, <mailto:hipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 15 Dec 2012 07:51:10 -0000

Hi,

On 12/15/2012 09:40 AM, Henderson, Thomas R wrote:
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: hipsec-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:hipsec-bounces@ietf.org] On
>> Behalf Of Ari Keranen
>> Sent: Friday, December 14, 2012 5:15 AM
>> To: hipsec@ietf.org
>> Subject: Re: [Hipsec] Fwd: Status of WG items
>>
>> Or we can do this.
>>
>> However, I would not be too concerned for the CERT draft blocking the
>> reg draft given that the CERT draft should not require much (any?)
>> changes for STD track. Of course that would need someone driving that
>> work too.
>>
>> If there's not enough interest for that work (I think it's important
>> but don't have the cycles to do it myself), it makes sense to go
>> forward as proposed below.
>
> I agree with the above.  I would support carrying them forward as is and trying to publish together, but if the authors prefer to decouple, I would be fine with that approach.

I would also suggest pushing CERT draft to the standards track if the 
authors can contribute some cycles.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email