Re: [homenet] Support for RFC 7084 on shipping devices...

Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> Mon, 07 October 2019 04:10 UTC

Return-Path: <mellon@fugue.com>
X-Original-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB079120074 for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 6 Oct 2019 21:10:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id q4jivUvHHEDR for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 6 Oct 2019 21:10:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-oi1-x22d.google.com (mail-oi1-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::22d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4E15612006B for <homenet@ietf.org>; Sun, 6 Oct 2019 21:10:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-oi1-x22d.google.com with SMTP id w65so10490012oiw.8 for <homenet@ietf.org>; Sun, 06 Oct 2019 21:10:13 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=content-transfer-encoding:from:mime-version:date:subject:message-id :cc:to; bh=cE23/4Ekw+XNsmVQ0SYrUDwkT7aRtTnd3x7WiPHYhn8=; b=l/hdcgvuDzqxQZ6SaCB3b0ovUpDhdlTrK1TMWfZWg1FfYnGma8Otbt441WzCxUIrsV Pb4+Lu25BGTwZuaOEqDwZGIeWoZ0fabMWYGB1JU5MBqy59IxPWu8Fy0KvkOCH/5SQvyT ZuaHEkogGflLKaNZtPMSSQF+3P4YhA1b9cMz6Ncm9W50Drk9bfBHRpphkjEK0sn2MwWt zaISX6/OHzYO+BaUJWzlpj8eeh9FsqLSdvml+M8SH5vR+P4jSGV9j8Z5hMUmvjc/3d44 PC18J0iNiqzLCnm8ZizdtH5xhBZ7wAbagEJUO/csbziK9bBlTbhTSk5SNApGcIJMSnv4 kqsA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:content-transfer-encoding:from:mime-version:date :subject:message-id:cc:to; bh=cE23/4Ekw+XNsmVQ0SYrUDwkT7aRtTnd3x7WiPHYhn8=; b=WB2izdThQO1HLHDN8Ar5EOIiWxRbHlMMhjbzQA4kDHz9nNrSWcCxoevgwnjTHgOrsr +c/csna4ce2We0QnP64sWmgcV8/jjMFU+zZOygDbU7tpWmNI589SL1IVgaEu57Mf0sRC 4fDbOuGgwSgjg0iScWWaOcjl9+L6kIOeXM32j9DBbcS31FMEV4nLF9Oa30iLvoeutP93 cW3CSaLKBlAs2NRP3XF02QtTj+VSx5oUREip3aP3uZ0WK7SFfxur7LtKzNn/mbRvgqsa 3H9gzZXriuSwgpFbW1ebwgvcycYHkl2VdtiQVUYSVnpRKir9KGpOd0MKv5gAohLupVWu Yhxg==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVEaSSDTs47auA6dDTOGDGnG9OK+CJnXGXbV2WCfO9AwgsE9Xt6 zcBgjr4DieDhzdOugNhLuE8zY6tDR3Q=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwj5W5uPZScZUz4nvJfprd/buKKvXV7V5clFOsoh0bKFi/A+PwM5eOZQwrJM8bM3hpxJaz+Ww==
X-Received: by 2002:aca:e005:: with SMTP id x5mr16133271oig.51.1570421412438; Sun, 06 Oct 2019 21:10:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.10.9.29] (cpe-24-243-152-218.rgv.res.rr.com. [24.243.152.218]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id v132sm4142108oif.34.2019.10.06.21.10.11 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Sun, 06 Oct 2019 21:10:11 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
From: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
Date: Sun, 6 Oct 2019 23:10:10 -0500
Message-Id: <266266A4-44A6-406F-AC9C-A6F1DEC59135@fugue.com>
Cc: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>, Mark Smith <markzzzsmith@gmail.com>, 6MAN <6man@ietf.org>, Markus Stenberg <homenet@ietf.org>
To: Gyan Mishra <hayabusagsm@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (17A850)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/homenet/4LTBeUuRdqhuXItqsl81vBg-moU>
Subject: Re: [homenet] Support for RFC 7084 on shipping devices...
X-BeenThere: homenet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Homenet WG mailing list <homenet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/homenet/>
List-Post: <mailto:homenet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Oct 2019 04:10:15 -0000

What you’ve proposed doesn’t seem like it would make things better. 7084 give us working ipv6 on the home network. What you’re proposing would take that away. Let’s not go in that direction. 

> On Oct 6, 2019, at 23:05, Gyan Mishra <hayabusagsm@gmail.com> wrote:
>