Re: [homenet] Support for RFC 7084 on shipping devices...

Gyan Mishra <hayabusagsm@gmail.com> Mon, 07 October 2019 06:57 UTC

Return-Path: <hayabusagsm@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15C491200F3; Sun, 6 Oct 2019 23:57:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.997
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.997 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dexD7y8xTzxb; Sun, 6 Oct 2019 23:57:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qt1-x82a.google.com (mail-qt1-x82a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::82a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DA22E12002F; Sun, 6 Oct 2019 23:57:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qt1-x82a.google.com with SMTP id w14so17713152qto.9; Sun, 06 Oct 2019 23:57:25 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:mime-version:subject:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=Tpm6xcWKCRzCckaNrD0j9YOmWhPKZyj6bD7nASMl0Co=; b=BYrHXQXTGCBdIhfc2aR/8g72rAc8CyKRFoKaROeMQe6dnrDss60e4y7m7Ocn5JzuEq mpWHdYnwTPHw21kZxuKo3Kc5agAtXVyXMBooxo54I212PMzfli+CBL2ZAD6RRVDXmm0M oTQFTADrpwI+XCHLabykLP2FU5jrb6tVpsmhuUNyuTT98bPfqBpt2yhKhlT0vsi5/GHP Rmskr0RopRBZgW9mr6fuwRA5js7vhi7TfWmdnFaJ6oPfV5i3spQW4Dgeqxlxs/oHOA1+ YzPis//glpFfkc1XKqk3O9tMhkZe9IAb8ltsB7Ff7Ci+2HXyBTXL62HeDROrP03Sa081 jqrA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:mime-version:subject:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=Tpm6xcWKCRzCckaNrD0j9YOmWhPKZyj6bD7nASMl0Co=; b=Hpl5Sa3lRUBukYUeAfp6bsN3DGjyOg3TA77r6z5ygO6OZSifA1TsRy91bi5kIKsN7t RuKgal6O/P5P0Z0/jlQWlUVK5wD9Nv77TffFaC2tcDKKPmHs4mqT7LENwhotZp6qXvyW e+YLSzcAxVKNirN8irAXsrPlV7vnwHyamL4N5atK9yRhtn7r0amnntecKaPlQ9aXHX6t vMbAhbwO6tubCQno8kSeyZFKzce9y5KkBTcrpSnoIYBSJ5E4rhz26sHqcCOshakLalh6 GPmP3bYojA5vYHX/lxH8+MdkpGaQ9sgnU1oAnNsxqnuER5cADSiGZ4n4YtGk+zqAI327 mScw==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVUUgjxWfyEEdTHp19LHW6vYRZ/JAujLI7cJHfo2NB+AEhOyS9h dq6ZAZ7X1SyZnCs9n3kYaOajq+4hydg=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzmJuQoeD5N3tJ7kDrs/zhqM+1PQdTJZhkqujy89L8+MP8OsVTVIbuaennfblbYTOxstnVTvw==
X-Received: by 2002:ac8:469a:: with SMTP id g26mr28361228qto.265.1570431444449; Sun, 06 Oct 2019 23:57:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.213] (pool-72-83-194-140.washdc.fios.verizon.net. [72.83.194.140]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id d16sm6711325qkl.7.2019.10.06.23.57.23 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sun, 06 Oct 2019 23:57:23 -0700 (PDT)
From: Gyan Mishra <hayabusagsm@gmail.com>
X-Google-Original-From: Gyan Mishra <hayabusaGSM@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-48EBC289-45B5-469E-B014-F3451E4FEDA0
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (16G102)
In-Reply-To: <5981DA62-05AD-491B-8DF3-6282588E3EE7@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 7 Oct 2019 02:57:23 -0400
Cc: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>, Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>, Mark Smith <markzzzsmith@gmail.com>, 6MAN <6man@ietf.org>, Markus Stenberg <homenet@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <8257A49A-4C78-4B0A-86B5-E34227137470@gmail.com>
References: <266266A4-44A6-406F-AC9C-A6F1DEC59135@fugue.com> <5981DA62-05AD-491B-8DF3-6282588E3EE7@gmail.com>
To: Gyan Mishra <hayabusagsm@gmail.com>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/homenet/g38LIp1Gvbe0poNU1-vGfmCAF3Q>
Subject: Re: [homenet] Support for RFC 7084 on shipping devices...
X-BeenThere: homenet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Homenet WG mailing list <homenet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/homenet/>
List-Post: <mailto:homenet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Oct 2019 06:57:28 -0000

In-line

Sent from my iPhone

> On Oct 7, 2019, at 2:47 AM, Gyan Mishra <hayabusagsm@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> Sent from my iPhone
> 
>> On Oct 7, 2019, at 12:10 AM, Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> wrote:
>> 
>> What you’ve proposed doesn’t seem like it would make things better. 7084 give us working ipv6 on the home network. What you’re proposing would take that away. Let’s not go in that direction. 
>> 
> [Gyan] Understood. I agree that NANOG would be a better forum to discuss deployments of HNCP and use cases and issues that have come up in deployments. But if there is a gap in the standards I agree we can address it here.

  I found this link to draft on HNCP routing protocol Babel below

https://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-homenet-babel-profile-06.html

Also a good presentation on homenet and how it works:

http://www.space.net/~gert/14_council_homenet_en-final.ppt


> 
>>> On Oct 6, 2019, at 23:05, Gyan Mishra <hayabusagsm@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>