Re: Report on preliminary decision on TLS 1.3 and client auth

"Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk@phk.freebsd.dk> Fri, 25 September 2015 10:19 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request+bounce-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki=lists.ie@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 489771A899D for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 25 Sep 2015 03:19:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.912
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.912 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZkUkilak4FLr for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 25 Sep 2015 03:19:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4A3001A8981 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Fri, 25 Sep 2015 03:19:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1ZfQ2A-0004Le-D9 for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Fri, 25 Sep 2015 10:15:18 +0000
Resent-Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2015 10:15:18 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1ZfQ2A-0004Le-D9@frink.w3.org>
Received: from maggie.w3.org ([128.30.52.39]) by frink.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>) id 1ZfQ25-0004KB-FZ for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Fri, 25 Sep 2015 10:15:13 +0000
Received: from phk.freebsd.dk ([130.225.244.222]) by maggie.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>) id 1ZfQ1z-0002aa-5A for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Fri, 25 Sep 2015 10:15:12 +0000
Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (unknown [192.168.55.3]) by phk.freebsd.dk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 814CD4F86F; Fri, 25 Sep 2015 10:14:44 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by critter.freebsd.dk (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id t8PAEfce007302; Fri, 25 Sep 2015 10:14:41 GMT (envelope-from phk@phk.freebsd.dk)
To: Yoav Nir <ynir.ietf@gmail.com>
cc: Amos Jeffries <squid3@treenet.co.nz>, Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
In-reply-to: <8F0BC939-B0BD-43F6-AB41-7676B5B94054@gmail.com>
From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
References: <CABkgnnWREq6X+chcvookChGAZGxkJ6Zs_7FGwz7Mbn12XMxewQ@mail.gmail.com> <5603599F.8090303@treenet.co.nz> <CABkgnnVq9FDeGf_=JF0m0AkgfO1G3DVV2QN_aPrbYnFtfRLFrw@mail.gmail.com> <5603745A.7020509@treenet.co.nz> <6818.1443172702@critter.freebsd.dk> <8F0BC939-B0BD-43F6-AB41-7676B5B94054@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <7300.1443176081.1@critter.freebsd.dk>
Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2015 10:14:41 +0000
Message-ID: <7301.1443176081@critter.freebsd.dk>
Received-SPF: none client-ip=130.225.244.222; envelope-from=phk@phk.freebsd.dk; helo=phk.freebsd.dk
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.3
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=-1.445, BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=0.001, W3C_AA=-1, W3C_WL=-1
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: maggie.w3.org 1ZfQ1z-0002aa-5A 393a06e3b3d312e5e2feff8eda33fd96
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: Report on preliminary decision on TLS 1.3 and client auth
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/7301.1443176081@critter.freebsd.dk>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/30274
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

--------
In message <8F0BC939-B0BD-43F6-AB41-7676B5B94054@gmail.com>, Yoav Nir writes:
>
>> On Sep 25, 2015, at 12:18 PM, Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk> wrote:
>> 
>> --------
>> In message <5603745A.7020509@treenet.co.nz>, Amos Jeffries writes:
>> 
>>> Ah. Sorry I seem to have misunderstood yoru meaning of "provides the
>>> proof that a server needs to regard the entire session to be authentic"
>>> to mean the cert was connection-wide.
>> 
>> I would like to remind people that, contrary to widespread assumptions,
>> HTTP doesn't have "sessions".
>> 
>> Sessions are typically implemented by mistaking (groups of) connections
>> for a session, or by means of opaque unstandardized cookies.
>
>Why do you call cookies unstandardized?

Cookies are standardized just fine.

What I tried to say above is that we don't know which cookie
identifies the session.

-- 
Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk@FreeBSD.ORG         | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer       | BSD since 4.3-tahoe    
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.