Re: #428 Accept-Language ordering for identical qvalues

Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> Sat, 16 February 2013 08:55 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 438DD21F86AD for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 16 Feb 2013 00:55:45 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Bk9BZqxZpVLe for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 16 Feb 2013 00:55:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2CCF21F8700 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Sat, 16 Feb 2013 00:55:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1U6dWu-0003Z9-TD for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Sat, 16 Feb 2013 08:53:56 +0000
Resent-Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2013 08:53:56 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1U6dWu-0003Z9-TD@frink.w3.org>
Received: from lisa.w3.org ([128.30.52.41]) by frink.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <julian.reschke@gmx.de>) id 1U6dWm-0003YL-UA for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Sat, 16 Feb 2013 08:53:48 +0000
Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.20]) by lisa.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <julian.reschke@gmx.de>) id 1U6dWm-00074w-2u for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Sat, 16 Feb 2013 08:53:48 +0000
Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net ([10.1.76.34]) by mrigmx.server.lan (mrigmx001) with ESMTP (Nemesis) id 0Lex3B-1UgIOt3rX5-00ql4T for <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>; Sat, 16 Feb 2013 09:53:20 +0100
Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 16 Feb 2013 08:53:20 -0000
Received: from unknown (EHLO [192.168.2.100]) [89.204.130.193] by mail.gmx.net (mp034) with SMTP; 16 Feb 2013 09:53:20 +0100
X-Authenticated: #1915285
X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1++bAYJ38S+oJqlA4PI+ih0uVkLqlK1Oh5KYDKPt5 lJgo3s/c8mgjuq
Message-ID: <511F48FC.2000900@gmx.de>
Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2013 09:53:16 +0100
From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130107 Thunderbird/17.0.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Nicholas Shanks <nickshanks@nickshanks.com>
CC: "Roy T. Fielding" <fielding@gbiv.com>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
References: <50F6CD98.8080802@gmx.de> <99A8B4D1-BE1B-4965-9B78-1EC90455E102@mnot.net> <F4C2A095-50C7-451B-9AFF-A200592CCB4D@gbiv.com> <98F554C9-4FCB-47E4-A018-FE02558FEA49@mnot.net> <6E9D9BB9-A5F5-417A-A640-AF03AFCC6496@gbiv.com> <20130213080845.377e969d34ef48ae92aee519@bisonsystems.net> <7937E7D3-8870-4189-B9EF-AE178E6CB13B@gbiv.com> <CA+hEJVVYd7wu2aURFs5aNfMGEgwVannH2hsxpzr2++fYbTUZ8w@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CA+hEJVVYd7wu2aURFs5aNfMGEgwVannH2hsxpzr2++fYbTUZ8w@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=212.227.17.20; envelope-from=julian.reschke@gmx.de; helo=mout.gmx.net
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.3
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=-2.371, BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: lisa.w3.org 1U6dWm-00074w-2u 75cf4b55fc8d55a52bf0e3aa8bfdea6c
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: #428 Accept-Language ordering for identical qvalues
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/511F48FC.2000900@gmx.de>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/16618
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

On 2013-02-16 01:40, Nicholas Shanks wrote:
> On Wednesday, 13 February 2013, Roy T. Fielding wrote:
>
>
>     Proactive conneg is an optional feature of HTTP.
>
>     ....Roy
>
>
>
> will Accept-* be demoted to appendices and Alternates & Link get higher
> prominence in the updated HTTP 1.1 specs?

No.

As a reminder: we are past WGLC with these documents.

> I would love it if browsers automatically selected from provided
> alternates based on device-specific heuristics when receiving a 406.

Best regards, Julian