IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [hybi] I-D Action:draft-ietf-hybi-thewebsocketprotocol-01.txt

John Tamplin <jat@google.com> Thu, 02 September 2010 17:48 UTC

Return-Path: <jat@google.com>
X-Original-To: hybi@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: hybi@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D1F73A6826 for <hybi@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 2 Sep 2010 10:48:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -105.622
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-105.622 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.355, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id uMxgggAJlHNX for <hybi@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 2 Sep 2010 10:48:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp-out.google.com (smtp-out.google.com [74.125.121.35]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E37A3A6AC4 for <hybi@ietf.org>; Thu, 2 Sep 2010 10:22:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from wpaz24.hot.corp.google.com (wpaz24.hot.corp.google.com [172.24.198.88]) by smtp-out.google.com with ESMTP id o82HMVKJ008432 for <hybi@ietf.org>; Thu, 2 Sep 2010 10:22:32 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=beta; t=1283448152; bh=Xhyfix0yBzkV0/oyEhEZ+MUhH60=; h=MIME-Version:In-Reply-To:References:From:Date:Message-ID:Subject: To:Cc:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=D1CdajXnj/f+rCLpLHTAXQsqMJZ8+3rfdJ4dD8lz3n2L1eTiA0xRVZ4LdKP2QvZ78 vM4jVJpokQ1Kdpn0XHRZg==
Received: from gwj15 (gwj15.prod.google.com [10.200.10.15]) by wpaz24.hot.corp.google.com with ESMTP id o82HM0oW028896 for <hybi@ietf.org>; Thu, 2 Sep 2010 10:22:30 -0700
Received: by gwj15 with SMTP id 15so289901gwj.10 for <hybi@ietf.org>; Thu, 02 Sep 2010 10:22:30 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:in-reply-to :references:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=QShpE2C0MnqsJk1zjon/2JN1H+6SlAKfw7AkZc/oNfw=; b=gYE0ir/XXtZIxrP4IwQZjoPGeqRGlYC0+/bSbcpF6OIpWjy8tTEFZqR6sOvizQGrfv 7aMJ804D11ubmAH+BbXQ==
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=google.com; s=beta; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=v9HbD+zQQuJgCzWd5kaSegqcj1rkVhwivpdl1T9wtvXrSmTu8jWeQ/IrZFKCEhOSZc ys1P+KKghsWPMhDiVnIA==
Received: by 10.150.206.16 with SMTP id d16mr511470ybg.102.1283448150244; Thu, 02 Sep 2010 10:22:30 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.151.103.4 with HTTP; Thu, 2 Sep 2010 10:22:10 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTi=m7QxBm7xjn2AbbkW-ihfE7tiA9cSdrHVoYq5=@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20100901224502.0519B3A687C@core3.amsl.com> <AANLkTikP1CF22fL0rBniXmrxEoBAbTNfzP9kyiNA4nbb@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTi=_1m36ThFZTH_aGE_Unz0KTeexJq_74UGr2j+u@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTikmYvJaZnc-SAaGm1Xztn31DqTnttonKFNBvT86@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTimHUDGW=XGgjPFG9n+s01Q21e_BvHS+X6VSFUdD@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTikKHi3Wqy+SgYzk9KxU8o9dpAbEZCQH3UcPkAa_@mail.gmail.com> <4C7FB233.1050908@helsinki.fi> <AANLkTi=m7QxBm7xjn2AbbkW-ihfE7tiA9cSdrHVoYq5=@mail.gmail.com>
From: John Tamplin <jat@google.com>
Date: Thu, 02 Sep 2010 13:22:10 -0400
Message-ID: <AANLkTinND-=7qreVbJEESdyqg7imT90mFKdnwH_E0yo4@mail.gmail.com>
To: ifette@google.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-System-Of-Record: true
Cc: hybi <hybi@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [hybi] I-D Action:draft-ietf-hybi-thewebsocketprotocol-01.txt
X-BeenThere: hybi@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Server-Initiated HTTP <hybi.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hybi>, <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/hybi>
List-Post: <mailto:hybi@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hybi>, <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Sep 2010 17:48:30 -0000

On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 12:53 PM, Ian Fette (イアンフェッティ) <ifette@google.com> wrote:
> Subprotocols are intended to be an application level indication, and IMO
> should affect base framing. This seems to be conflating issues.

Did you mean "should not affect"?  If not, I think I am
misunderstanding your point.

-- 
John A. Tamplin
Software Engineer (GWT), Google

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email