Re: [hybi] I-D Action:draft-ietf-hybi-thewebsocketprotocol-01.txt

Ian Fette (イアンフェッティ) <ifette@google.com> Thu, 02 September 2010 16:24 UTC

Return-Path: <ifette@google.com>
X-Original-To: hybi@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: hybi@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08D2C3A6803 for <hybi@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 2 Sep 2010 09:24:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -105.469
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-105.469 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.207, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EXaJdYCWzhZ8 for <hybi@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 2 Sep 2010 09:24:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp-out.google.com (smtp-out.google.com [216.239.44.51]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6A053A65A5 for <hybi@ietf.org>; Thu, 2 Sep 2010 09:24:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from wpaz1.hot.corp.google.com (wpaz1.hot.corp.google.com [172.24.198.65]) by smtp-out.google.com with ESMTP id o82GP0XX032171 for <hybi@ietf.org>; Thu, 2 Sep 2010 09:25:00 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=beta; t=1283444700; bh=29cVsIstUyGxrYmqg3tJKkUVSf4=; h=MIME-Version:Reply-To:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: Subject:From:To:Cc:Content-Type; b=hsTF4aKSpEeLr50naqLtTmCodGvuxHS6cV2C1++VKkp+eHGICdGhGtowxRqeU5x/d j0pMmfBHOhdTDSLbhtJYA==
Received: from gwb20 (gwb20.prod.google.com [10.200.2.20]) by wpaz1.hot.corp.google.com with ESMTP id o82GOxaK016875 for <hybi@ietf.org>; Thu, 2 Sep 2010 09:24:59 -0700
Received: by gwb20 with SMTP id 20so306607gwb.17 for <hybi@ietf.org>; Thu, 02 Sep 2010 09:24:59 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:reply-to :in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc :content-type; bh=lVmJdVMdGpM5c6k49+Q0airrscdmfRutdTnoXIYWYeo=; b=aIXJb2drxAX7QeVwWj3fYUE0Q3/nvxCWygGdj+IZ6T9YeooSQHDVDeWxRh0SeUmErS YR3Q4pymnP6CYLMF6sIw==
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=google.com; s=beta; h=mime-version:reply-to:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type; b=Pa11ZO3lLQd3BngCs0CnoN5jvE74Qk2SKiJ9qpXRyuaWYgmS6wf5WUSPAilvhYblUI TI+WLEZ3Lm9qNGcBqEYQ==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.150.225.2 with SMTP id x2mr273681ybg.407.1283444698538; Thu, 02 Sep 2010 09:24:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.150.229.7 with HTTP; Thu, 2 Sep 2010 09:24:58 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <op.vieipeemidj3kv@simon-pieterss-macbook.local>
References: <20100901224502.0519B3A687C@core3.amsl.com> <AANLkTi=u3t6ayoKQSs8oZu=gdaU5k_+UuKjSQfg+3ATb@mail.gmail.com> <op.vieipeemidj3kv@simon-pieterss-macbook.local>
Date: Thu, 02 Sep 2010 09:24:58 -0700
Message-ID: <AANLkTi=_1zd9G=6jGU5m+spxCxNh511juE64bWzLpaVu@mail.gmail.com>
From: "Ian Fette (イアンフェッティ)" <ifette@google.com>
To: Simon Pieters <simonp@opera.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000e0cd48792587d01048f494145"
X-System-Of-Record: true
Cc: hybi@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [hybi] I-D Action:draft-ietf-hybi-thewebsocketprotocol-01.txt
X-BeenThere: hybi@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: ifette@google.com
List-Id: Server-Initiated HTTP <hybi.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hybi>, <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/hybi>
List-Post: <mailto:hybi@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hybi>, <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Sep 2010 16:24:32 -0000

2010/9/2 Simon Pieters <simonp@opera.com>

> On Thu, 02 Sep 2010 00:55:09 +0200, Ian Fette (イアンフェッティ) <
> ifette@google.com> wrote:
>
>  I'd like to give a quick explanation of what has changed in this draft.
>>
>> This draft was begun by taking the -00 version, not what was referred to
>> as
>> "draft-ietf-hybi-thewebsocketprotocol-latest". The -latest version had a
>> number of changes after -00, some of which had been discussed on the list
>> and some of which hadn't. (You can see the changes at
>>
>> http://tools.ietf.org/tools/rfcdiff/rfcdiff.pyht?url1=http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-hybi-thewebsocketprotocol-00.txt&url2=http://svn.tools.ietf.org/svn/wg/hybi/websocket/draft-ietf-hybi-thewebsocketprotocol-latest
>> )
>> Many of these changes are editorial (e.g. "the server must not send any
>> further data to the server" -> "the server must not send any further data
>> to
>> the client"), but there were also a large number of non-editorial changes,
>> e.g. to the handshake.
>>
>> The handshake in -01 is the same as in -00. There are certainly open
>> issues
>> against the handshake, and I do not mean to dismiss them, they simply are
>> not addressed in this draft.
>>
>
> Some of those changes were in response to feedback from me (mostly sent to
> whatwg). I was happy with the changes Ian Hickson made. What's the plan? Is
> there something I should do if I want those changes in?
>
> Cheers,
>

IMO best thing would be to send an email to this list explaining what the
change is, and why it was needed. I don't want to lose these changes, I just
want to make sure they are discussed on this list.


> --
> Simon Pieters
> Opera Software
>