IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [hybi] I-D Action:draft-ietf-hybi-thewebsocketprotocol-01.txt

Joe Hildebrand <joe.hildebrand@webex.com> Thu, 02 September 2010 05:50 UTC

Return-Path: <Joe.Hildebrand@webex.com>
X-Original-To: hybi@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: hybi@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2ACA83A68D2 for <hybi@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 1 Sep 2010 22:50:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -104.17
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-104.17 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.362, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO=2.067, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GA+MGLqAmwBD for <hybi@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 1 Sep 2010 22:50:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gw1.webex.com (gw1.webex.com [64.68.122.208]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 5EAF53A694A for <hybi@ietf.org>; Wed, 1 Sep 2010 22:50:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from SRV-EXSC03.webex.local ([192.168.252.197]) by gw1.webex.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Wed, 1 Sep 2010 22:51:22 -0700
Received: from 66.114.169.7 ([66.114.169.7]) by SRV-EXSC03.webex.local ([192.168.252.200]) via Exchange Front-End Server mailus.webex.com ([66.114.175.12]) with Microsoft Exchange Server HTTP-DAV ; Thu, 2 Sep 2010 05:50:51 +0000
User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/12.24.0.100205
Date: Wed, 01 Sep 2010 23:50:50 -0600
From: Joe Hildebrand <joe.hildebrand@webex.com>
To: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>, John Tamplin <jat@google.com>
Message-ID: <C8A4975A.346B1%joe.hildebrand@webex.com>
Thread-Topic: [hybi] I-D Action:draft-ietf-hybi-thewebsocketprotocol-01.txt
Thread-Index: ActKXpyWRMD5cchlQFWxebt44OAdfQABC9qx
In-Reply-To: <20100902052042.GE10275@1wt.eu>
IM-ID: xmpp:jhildebr@cisco.com
Presence-ID: xmpp:jhildebr@cisco.com
Jabber-ID: jhildebr@cisco.com
Mime-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 02 Sep 2010 05:51:22.0590 (UTC) FILETIME=[DF6CEFE0:01CB4A62]
Cc: hybi <hybi@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [hybi] I-D Action:draft-ietf-hybi-thewebsocketprotocol-01.txt
X-BeenThere: hybi@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Server-Initiated HTTP <hybi.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hybi>, <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/hybi>
List-Post: <mailto:hybi@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hybi>, <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Sep 2010 05:50:55 -0000

On 9/1/10 11:20 PM, "Willy Tarreau" <w@1wt.eu> wrote:

> Let's use something like "X-WebSocket-Experimental: xxx" or something
> clear enough on this subject.

Well... One of our ADs just wrote this:

http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-saintandre-xdash-considered-harmful

Perhaps Peter would give his opinion on this use of X-?

-- 
Joe Hildebrand

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email