Re: [hybi] I-D Action:draft-ietf-hybi-thewebsocketprotocol-01.txt

Ian Fette (イアンフェッティ) <ifette@google.com> Thu, 02 September 2010 00:10 UTC

Return-Path: <ifette@google.com>
X-Original-To: hybi@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: hybi@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0AF123A6A10 for <hybi@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 1 Sep 2010 17:10:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -105.458
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-105.458 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.218, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7oiJfpoE+fPK for <hybi@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 1 Sep 2010 17:10:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp-out.google.com (smtp-out.google.com [216.239.44.51]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36FD83A68E2 for <hybi@ietf.org>; Wed, 1 Sep 2010 17:10:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from wpaz24.hot.corp.google.com (wpaz24.hot.corp.google.com [172.24.198.88]) by smtp-out.google.com with ESMTP id o81Nc10D004965 for <hybi@ietf.org>; Wed, 1 Sep 2010 16:38:01 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=beta; t=1283384281; bh=7SlQ9lV1MkBgFuHvU3VQ8bt8eQE=; h=MIME-Version:Reply-To:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: Subject:From:To:Cc:Content-Type; b=iFwZv8fkWd7zfDxK+m6JpnivPd4xiiVbn8gBkglHBHO9bZnvYJBWAT6oXTNDIi/46 EwbxkCbIVacF7A/tjEcmg==
Received: from qwj9 (qwj9.prod.google.com [10.241.195.73]) by wpaz24.hot.corp.google.com with ESMTP id o81Nc03N015668 for <hybi@ietf.org>; Wed, 1 Sep 2010 16:38:00 -0700
Received: by qwj9 with SMTP id 9so6902119qwj.10 for <hybi@ietf.org>; Wed, 01 Sep 2010 16:38:00 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:received :reply-to:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc :content-type; bh=nDb7kD+tUiodBwEe/FCOT+WVQxxZ0nj02YwNjcdMB10=; b=rZcjNah5KyjzzRDCpafrOagXNDKvKqe+/TELMDs/rdcd0Gn7rqMnIMRfyMN79hBAtF lfsekem5jWLp3/Jn1x3g==
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=google.com; s=beta; h=mime-version:reply-to:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type; b=V1jrxb2Iqn+6FlTyEvAplOad41BxjlPW1X4ezNUZGwtl1JejreKVOBL6rJWdd8aOaW q97RRu+AnFKU3yTEj0sw==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.224.114.89 with SMTP id d25mr5759385qaq.132.1283384280053; Wed, 01 Sep 2010 16:38:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.229.13.225 with HTTP; Wed, 1 Sep 2010 16:37:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.229.13.225 with HTTP; Wed, 1 Sep 2010 16:37:59 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTimHUDGW=XGgjPFG9n+s01Q21e_BvHS+X6VSFUdD@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20100901224502.0519B3A687C@core3.amsl.com> <AANLkTikP1CF22fL0rBniXmrxEoBAbTNfzP9kyiNA4nbb@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTi=_1m36ThFZTH_aGE_Unz0KTeexJq_74UGr2j+u@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTikmYvJaZnc-SAaGm1Xztn31DqTnttonKFNBvT86@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTimHUDGW=XGgjPFG9n+s01Q21e_BvHS+X6VSFUdD@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 01 Sep 2010 16:37:59 -0700
Message-ID: <AANLkTikKHi3Wqy+SgYzk9KxU8o9dpAbEZCQH3UcPkAa_@mail.gmail.com>
From: "Ian Fette (イアンフェッティ)" <ifette@google.com>
To: John Tamplin <jat@google.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000feaee58241f7a43048f3b3093"
X-System-Of-Record: true
Cc: hybi <hybi@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [hybi] I-D Action:draft-ietf-hybi-thewebsocketprotocol-01.txt
X-BeenThere: hybi@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: ifette@google.com
List-Id: Server-Initiated HTTP <hybi.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hybi>, <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/hybi>
List-Post: <mailto:hybi@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hybi>, <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Sep 2010 00:10:47 -0000

+1. Adam, I share your concerns about versions on the web, but the reality
is there is no other way right now. Suggestions welcome as to alternatives.

On Sep 1, 2010 4:27 PM, "John Tamplin" <jat@google.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 7:18 PM, Greg Wilkins <gregw@webtide.com> wrote:
>> my proposal was not to add versioning to the protocol - as I know some
>> think it is an anti pattern.
>>
>> I just want to be able to implement the next draft without breaking
>> all my users that have been working on the last draft.   So my
>> proposal is only for a draft version to be added by implementers as
>> non-standard convenience at this time. The lack of a draft version can
>> be taken to mean the final stable version.
>>
>> How else do you expect servers to track the drafts and deal with the
>> various browser implementations out there?
>
> The problem is that the framing of v75, v76, v00, and v01 are
> incompatible. If you want to write a server that interoperates with
> browsers implementing these drafts (I know at least v75 and v76 are in
> the wild), then you have to rely on heuristics to figure out which one
> you are talking to. Even if there isn't a version in the 1.0 spec,
> any attempt to get real-world data while the spec is changing means
> you either have a version number or you heuristically determine one --
> the latter is obviously more prone to error.
>
> I would suggest adding Sec-WebSocket-Draft: 01 to implementations of
> this draft, and that header will only be present before the spec is
> finalized.
>
> --
> John A. Tamplin
> Software Engineer (GWT), Google
> _______________________________________________
> hybi mailing list
> hybi@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hybi