Re: [hybi] List of (mostly) editorial changes for draft-01

Greg Wilkins <gregw@webtide.com> Mon, 06 September 2010 23:33 UTC

Return-Path: <gregw@webtide.com>
X-Original-To: hybi@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: hybi@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41EAB3A684C for <hybi@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 6 Sep 2010 16:33:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.575
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.575 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.402, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CBQx0cyLFDO1 for <hybi@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 6 Sep 2010 16:33:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wy0-f172.google.com (mail-wy0-f172.google.com [74.125.82.172]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF1CA3A6813 for <hybi@ietf.org>; Mon, 6 Sep 2010 16:33:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by wyi11 with SMTP id 11so5746665wyi.31 for <hybi@ietf.org>; Mon, 06 Sep 2010 16:34:01 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.227.132.129 with SMTP id b1mr1018714wbt.5.1283816041536; Mon, 06 Sep 2010 16:34:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.227.154.145 with HTTP; Mon, 6 Sep 2010 16:34:01 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <1283781101.2285.560.camel@tng>
References: <20100901224502.0519B3A687C@core3.amsl.com> <AANLkTi=u3t6ayoKQSs8oZu=gdaU5k_+UuKjSQfg+3ATb@mail.gmail.com> <1283454039.2285.370.camel@tng> <AANLkTinv_0Dxp8JG7KYtVvKLei5+=XCw1TSZ_RmcPA+U@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTimXYatBsB0yXUP_Jf8LrB+2QNSpiUPy4FsEyJ7s@mail.gmail.com> <1283781101.2285.560.camel@tng>
Date: Tue, 07 Sep 2010 09:34:01 +1000
Message-ID: <AANLkTiku6GTfzYaJzEV5nub=fXZCjt_fDbFYpUmY0i6L@mail.gmail.com>
From: Greg Wilkins <gregw@webtide.com>
To: hybi <hybi@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Subject: Re: [hybi] List of (mostly) editorial changes for draft-01
X-BeenThere: hybi@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Server-Initiated HTTP <hybi.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hybi>, <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/hybi>
List-Post: <mailto:hybi@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hybi>, <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Sep 2010 23:33:35 -0000

On 6 September 2010 23:51, Patrick McManus <mcmanus@ducksong.com> wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-09-06 at 23:24 +1000, Greg Wilkins wrote:
>> On 3 September 2010 06:06, John Tamplin <jat@google.com> wrote:
>
> The zero-chunk on the end might be necessary if the sender didn't know
> there wouldn't be more fragments when it sent the last one.

Very good point.

> "The frame-more bit MUST NOT be used on any frame with a 0 application data length."

That is a reasonable compromise.