Re: [hybi] Is there a traffic jam?

Jamie Lokier <jamie@shareable.org> Tue, 14 April 2009 19:29 UTC

Return-Path: <jamie@shareable.org>
X-Original-To: hybi@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: hybi@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C751E28C235 for <hybi@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 14 Apr 2009 12:29:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-1.000, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VPW410ad9Zap for <hybi@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 14 Apr 2009 12:29:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail2.shareable.org (mail2.shareable.org [80.68.89.115]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0337728C231 for <hybi@ietf.org>; Tue, 14 Apr 2009 12:29:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from jamie by mail2.shareable.org with local (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from <jamie@shareable.org>) id 1LtoLK-0001Te-36; Tue, 14 Apr 2009 20:30:50 +0100
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 20:30:50 +0100
From: Jamie Lokier <jamie@shareable.org>
To: Sylvain Hellegouarch <sh@defuze.org>
Message-ID: <20090414193050.GK32311@shareable.org>
References: <03BCE29D-7AA5-4128-9F61-446E0229479A@lindenlab.com> <E51D5B15BFDEFD448F90BDD17D41CFF105A0C46E@AHQEX1.andrew.com> <Pine.LNX.4.62.0904132352430.10339@hixie.dreamhostps.com> <E51D5B15BFDEFD448F90BDD17D41CFF105A0C476@AHQEX1.andrew.com> <Pine.LNX.4.62.0904140002360.10339@hixie.dreamhostps.com> <49E428DD.3070803@defuze.org> <086D9C6DD2C9407D8D8CE0601FF0FD4A@mercury> <50044.193.253.216.132.1239692803.squirrel@mail1.webfaction.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <50044.193.253.216.132.1239692803.squirrel@mail1.webfaction.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11)
Cc: hybi@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [hybi] Is there a traffic jam?
X-BeenThere: hybi@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Server-Initiated HTTP <hybi.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hybi>, <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/hybi>
List-Post: <mailto:hybi@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hybi>, <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 19:29:41 -0000

Sylvain Hellegouarch wrote:
> Perhaps the reason BEEP has never taken off is because it's so versatile
> that it ultimately creates a bigger mismatch. I'm afraid WS might follow
> the same trend.

The BEEP web page suggests it's used more than you think.

I suspect not so much versatility (HTTP is versatile), as it's too
basic for a lot of applications.  You have to write your own stuff on
top of it, so you might as well go all the way and use TCP or SSL,
which isn't much harder and doesn't require you to learn another library.

Or at the other end of the scale, useing HTTP or something ugly like
SOAP containing a short string wrapped in 1k of pointlessness, because
that's provided by well known libraries and the handy
metadata/extensibility means you don't have to design your own way to
add those things ad hoc.

-- Jamie