Re: [hybi] Is there a traffic jam?

Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> Tue, 14 April 2009 00:03 UTC

Return-Path: <ian@hixie.ch>
X-Original-To: hybi@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: hybi@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A5B528C11C for <hybi@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 13 Apr 2009 17:03:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.406
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.406 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.807, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id aHXrJYzC6IdO for <hybi@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 13 Apr 2009 17:03:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from looneymail-a5.g.dreamhost.com (caibbdcaaaaf.dreamhost.com [208.113.200.5]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7304528C0FA for <hybi@ietf.org>; Mon, 13 Apr 2009 17:03:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from hixie.dreamhostps.com (hixie.dreamhost.com [208.113.210.27]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by looneymail-a5.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD273121FB0; Mon, 13 Apr 2009 17:04:18 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 00:04:18 +0000
From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
To: "Thomson, Martin" <Martin.Thomson@andrew.com>
In-Reply-To: <E51D5B15BFDEFD448F90BDD17D41CFF105A0C476@AHQEX1.andrew.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.62.0904140002360.10339@hixie.dreamhostps.com>
References: <03BCE29D-7AA5-4128-9F61-446E0229479A@lindenlab.com> <E51D5B15BFDEFD448F90BDD17D41CFF105A0C46E@AHQEX1.andrew.com> <Pine.LNX.4.62.0904132352430.10339@hixie.dreamhostps.com> <E51D5B15BFDEFD448F90BDD17D41CFF105A0C476@AHQEX1.andrew.com>
Content-Language: en-GB-hixie
Content-Style-Type: text/css
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset="US-ASCII"
Cc: hybi@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [hybi] Is there a traffic jam?
X-BeenThere: hybi@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Server-Initiated HTTP <hybi.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hybi>, <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/hybi>
List-Post: <mailto:hybi@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hybi>, <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 00:03:08 -0000

On Mon, 13 Apr 2009, Thomson, Martin wrote:
>
> Some do the right thing.  Others do what you might fear.

This is roughly why I believe one of our requirements should be that 
implementations should be possible in few lines of code without the use of 
any libraries. Sure, HTTP libraries are a dime a dozen, and we can rely on 
XML parsers and so on, but in practice, some will do the right thing, and 
others won't.

I'd rather have a protocol that's so simple that nobody will feel the need 
to write their own HTTP parser, say.

-- 
Ian Hickson               U+1047E                )\._.,--....,'``.    fL
http://ln.hixie.ch/       U+263A                /,   _.. \   _\  ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer.   `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'