Re: [I2nsf] Working Group document adoption

"Adrian Farrel" <adrian@olddog.co.uk> Mon, 11 January 2016 14:55 UTC

Return-Path: <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
X-Original-To: i2nsf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: i2nsf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E44561A0199 for <i2nsf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 11 Jan 2016 06:55:05 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -100.701
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-100.701 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_20=-0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CkUxpd3WHZkD for <i2nsf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 11 Jan 2016 06:55:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: from asmtp1.iomartmail.com (asmtp1.iomartmail.com [62.128.201.248]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CC3021A0151 for <i2nsf@ietf.org>; Mon, 11 Jan 2016 06:55:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: from asmtp1.iomartmail.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by asmtp1.iomartmail.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id u0BEt1dm024284 for <i2nsf@ietf.org>; Mon, 11 Jan 2016 14:55:01 GMT
Received: from 950129200 ([79.141.128.249]) (authenticated bits=0) by asmtp1.iomartmail.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id u0BEsxpB024213 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for <i2nsf@ietf.org>; Mon, 11 Jan 2016 14:55:01 GMT
From: Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
To: i2nsf@ietf.org
References: <00bc01d14c7e$95eb9690$c1c2c3b0$@olddog.co.uk>
In-Reply-To: <00bc01d14c7e$95eb9690$c1c2c3b0$@olddog.co.uk>
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2016 14:55:01 -0000
Message-ID: <00c501d14c80$0d1ffca0$275ff5e0$@olddog.co.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: AQIFmyK2oaL34DaaLPmC/crfuvYzV56NyA+w
Content-Language: en-gb
X-TM-AS-MML: disable
X-TM-AS-Product-Ver: IMSS-7.1.0.1679-8.0.0.1202-22060.000
X-TM-AS-Result: No--11.517-10.0-31-10
X-imss-scan-details: No--11.517-10.0-31-10
X-TMASE-MatchedRID: WMT2WRIkHPP0GGSQQaBfEYlD2T5imTkJ9pLnYtQ99xKHwGEm+CpYGVT9 Yy4hUwZ026TlE+g/8chrKrvLA7tDFF2kuSHmn3uD5gCHftmwEMK/1lA5VD2B0mecrqZc3vabrQ/ dVPjDq1273FftxyAiKSyO9YoiY+OdRZ41A2NdATZCvapcIkxJX3LhUU/qa4OGTMQIUFtoeIfC5q eIz1BfLXabNIWaEvZiOkFzm5NIdb7Of6FUr/HJkW/CU2X9JBM7jcUdKJrkZs2InvV8Dy0ZaP11b iCho4TaIAIDm5vZWu7mDVJEzjQzHwi0xaFtKyGqBEfU2vugRF0fXzVgO0hVqrFbhhcWxNQOARJi zF67UaOMc6UdzVWBom/vZ/TQCHA0OkjQDRo1OZR7sw7yO+Y9LPi4nVERfgwdxSZxKZrfThP06z+ XvHnOwbfqHaErmu92kZOl7WKIImq0P2qkGU0XysC4UUZr4lSF+gD2vYtOFhgqtq5d3cxkNYq+kW qnQ4S+S8cLb9UvxoQx8WsmucXkYWnpHDpN8iRS2Frd0gwmb0A=
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/i2nsf/91StbFlEOEwwnI73YCZjlUayr8c>
Subject: Re: [I2nsf] Working Group document adoption
X-BeenThere: i2nsf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: adrian@olddog.co.uk
List-Id: "*I2NSF: Interface to Network Security Functions mailing list*" <i2nsf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/i2nsf>, <mailto:i2nsf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/i2nsf/>
List-Post: <mailto:i2nsf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:i2nsf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2nsf>, <mailto:i2nsf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2016 14:55:06 -0000

Along the way, a change will be needed to
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-hares-i2nsf-merged-problem-use-cases/ to
leave only six names on the front page. The remainder will need to move to a
"Contributors" section.

You don't have to make this change now, but the version we adopt will need to
have sorted this out, so maybe the authors would like to discuss this amongst
themselves. I suggest you select three people to serve as editors for the
document, and settle everyone else as Contributors. If you like, the chairs can
help you decide, but I think you will be fine resolving it yourselves.

Thanks,
Adrian
--
Celebrate the New Year by buying someone you love a book.
Tales from the Wood - Eighteen new fairy tales
http://www.feedaread.com/books/Tales-from-the-Wood-9781786100924.aspx
http://www.amazon.co.uk/Tales-Wood-Adrian-Farrel/dp/1786100924
Or buy from me direct.


> -----Original Message-----
> From: I2nsf [mailto:i2nsf-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Adrian Farrel
> Sent: 11 January 2016 14:45
> To: i2nsf@ietf.org
> Subject: [I2nsf] Working Group document adoption
> 
> Hi Working group,
> 
> We had a working group milestone before Christmas to "Adopt use Cases,
> problem
> statement, and gap analysis as WG document".
> 
> Per the discussions in Yokohama, we struggled to compact all of this
information
> into a single document and plan to move ahead with two documents. The first is
a
> combined problem statement and use case document, the second is a gap
> analysis
> of existing IETF technologies.
> 
> We checked with the AD and she is happy that we take this approach.
> 
> Sue has been working on this and has posted
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-hares-i2nsf-merged-problem-use-cases/
> and
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-hares-i2nsf-gap-analysis/
> 
> These replace
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-hares-i2nsf-use-case-gap-analysis/
> 
> There was some small discussion on the list raising some points that may be
> addressed, but I think we can carry on, so this email starts a two week poll
for
> adoption of these documents as working group drafts. The poll will end on
> January 25th.
> 
> Please read the documents and express an opinion one way or another,
> preferably
> giving a reason for your thoughts.
> 
> Since Linda is a co-author of draft-hares-i2nsf-merged-problem-use-cases, I
will
> call consensus on that document.
> 
> Thanks,
> Adrian
> 
> _______________________________________________
> I2nsf mailing list
> I2nsf@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2nsf