[I2nsf] Support the adaptation of draft-hares-i2nsf-merged-problem-use-cases as the WG draft://答复: Working Group document adoption

Hi all,
I support the adaptation of draft-hares-i2nsf-merged-problem-use-cases as the WG draft. This document presents a very comprehensive description on the I2NSF problem scope and challenges, as well as the key use cases for access network and DC. It builds a solid ground for further solution related work.
I only have several editing comments right now:
1. The page header of " I2NSF Existing Work Analysis " is not correct;

2. the last paragraph of 3.1.2 is almost the same with 3.1.3;

3. combine 3.1.4 and 3.1.5 for describing the similar requirement about dynamic provisioning for a large and rapid changing network?

4. In 3.1.10, there are two paragraphs repeated, please check it.

5. In Terminology section, please add MILE, SACM, DOTS;

6. Generally, in use cases part, more contents are needed to emphasize only security policy management part is related with I2NSF.

B.R.
Frank

-----邮件原件-----
发件人: I2nsf [mailto:i2nsf-bounces@ietf.org] 代表 Adrian Farrel
发送时间: 2016年1月11日 22:45
收件人: i2nsf@ietf.org
主题: [I2nsf] Working Group document adoption

Hi Working group,

We had a working group milestone before Christmas to "Adopt use Cases, problem statement, and gap analysis as WG document".

Per the discussions in Yokohama, we struggled to compact all of this information into a single document and plan to move ahead with two documents. The first is a combined problem statement and use case document, the second is a gap analysis of existing IETF technologies.

We checked with the AD and she is happy that we take this approach.

Sue has been working on this and has posted https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-hares-i2nsf-merged-problem-use-cases/
and
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-hares-i2nsf-gap-analysis/

These replace
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-hares-i2nsf-use-case-gap-analysis/

There was some small discussion on the list raising some points that may be addressed, but I think we can carry on, so this email starts a two week poll for adoption of these documents as working group drafts. The poll will end on January 25th.

Please read the documents and express an opinion one way or another, preferably giving a reason for your thoughts.

Since Linda is a co-author of draft-hares-i2nsf-merged-problem-use-cases, I will call consensus on that document.

Thanks,
Adrian

_______________________________________________
I2nsf mailing list
I2nsf@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2nsf