[I2nsf] 答复: Working Group document adoption

Youjianjie <youjianjie@huawei.com> Mon, 18 January 2016 01:25 UTC

Return-Path: <youjianjie@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: i2nsf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: i2nsf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2F2B1ACECE for <i2nsf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 17 Jan 2016 17:25:44 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 2.087
X-Spam-Level: **
X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.087 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, CHARSET_FARAWAY_HEADER=3.2, CN_BODY_35=0.339, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, MIME_CHARSET_FARAWAY=2.45, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id I5c3_SaMKptD for <i2nsf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 17 Jan 2016 17:25:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 534BD1ACECB for <i2nsf@ietf.org>; Sun, 17 Jan 2016 17:25:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml403-hub.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg01-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id CGX92182; Mon, 18 Jan 2016 01:25:41 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from lhreml704-cah.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.130) by lhreml403-hub.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.217) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.235.1; Mon, 18 Jan 2016 01:25:40 +0000
Received: from NKGEML413-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.98.56.74) by lhreml704-cah.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.130) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.235.1; Mon, 18 Jan 2016 01:25:40 +0000
Received: from NKGEML515-MBX.china.huawei.com ([fe80::a54a:89d2:c471:ff]) by NKGEML413-HUB.china.huawei.com ([10.98.56.74]) with mapi id 14.03.0235.001; Mon, 18 Jan 2016 09:25:31 +0800
From: Youjianjie <youjianjie@huawei.com>
To: "adrian@olddog.co.uk" <adrian@olddog.co.uk>, "i2nsf@ietf.org" <i2nsf@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [I2nsf] Working Group document adoption
Thread-Index: AdFMfpIrlSnoJPdlT7SaF1vgplQ0mQFEHvUA
Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2016 01:25:30 +0000
Message-ID: <F6C28B32DA084644BB6C8D0BD65B669DBBAA91@NKGEML515-MBX.china.huawei.com>
References: <00bc01d14c7e$95eb9690$c1c2c3b0$@olddog.co.uk>
In-Reply-To: <00bc01d14c7e$95eb9690$c1c2c3b0$@olddog.co.uk>
Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.136.78.235]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="gb2312"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
X-Mirapoint-Virus-RAPID-Raw: score=unknown(0), refid=str=0001.0A090203.569C3F15.0049, ss=1, re=0.000, recu=0.000, reip=0.000, cl=1, cld=1, fgs=0, ip=0.0.0.0, so=2013-06-18 04:22:30, dmn=2013-03-21 17:37:32
X-Mirapoint-Loop-Id: 207fb7f3b23a4d818909b97184a9d812
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/i2nsf/goBtQgnHbLi_ZHTnWDsIY1BZqZg>
Subject: [I2nsf] 答复: Working Group document adoption
X-BeenThere: i2nsf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "*I2NSF: Interface to Network Security Functions mailing list*" <i2nsf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/i2nsf>, <mailto:i2nsf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/i2nsf/>
List-Post: <mailto:i2nsf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:i2nsf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2nsf>, <mailto:i2nsf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2016 01:25:45 -0000

I support adoption of both drafts.

Regards,
Jianjie
> -----邮件原件-----
> 发件人: I2nsf [mailto:i2nsf-bounces@ietf.org] 代表 Adrian Farrel
> 发送时间: 2016年1月11日 22:45
> 收件人: i2nsf@ietf.org
> 主题: [I2nsf] Working Group document adoption
> 
> Hi Working group,
> 
> We had a working group milestone before Christmas to "Adopt use Cases,
> problem statement, and gap analysis as WG document".
> 
> Per the discussions in Yokohama, we struggled to compact all of this
> information into a single document and plan to move ahead with two
> documents. The first is a combined problem statement and use case document,
> the second is a gap analysis of existing IETF technologies.
> 
> We checked with the AD and she is happy that we take this approach.
> 
> Sue has been working on this and has posted
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-hares-i2nsf-merged-problem-use-cases/
> and
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-hares-i2nsf-gap-analysis/
> 
> These replace
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-hares-i2nsf-use-case-gap-analysis/
> 
> There was some small discussion on the list raising some points that may be
> addressed, but I think we can carry on, so this email starts a two week poll for
> adoption of these documents as working group drafts. The poll will end on
> January 25th.
> 
> Please read the documents and express an opinion one way or another,
> preferably giving a reason for your thoughts.
> 
> Since Linda is a co-author of draft-hares-i2nsf-merged-problem-use-cases, I will
> call consensus on that document.
> 
> Thanks,
> Adrian
> 
> _______________________________________________
> I2nsf mailing list
> I2nsf@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2nsf