IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [I2nsf] Working Group document adoption

<mohamed.boucadair@orange.com> Wed, 13 January 2016 09:31 UTC

Return-Path: <mohamed.boucadair@orange.com>
X-Original-To: i2nsf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: i2nsf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 948EC1ACD31 for <i2nsf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 13 Jan 2016 01:31:53 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JYg7WKRnlXaC for <i2nsf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 13 Jan 2016 01:31:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: from relais-inet.francetelecom.com (relais-ias91.francetelecom.com [193.251.215.91]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 430161ACD42 for <i2nsf@ietf.org>; Wed, 13 Jan 2016 01:31:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: from omfedm07.si.francetelecom.fr (unknown [xx.xx.xx.3]) by omfedm13.si.francetelecom.fr (ESMTP service) with ESMTP id CB3B0324659; Wed, 13 Jan 2016 10:31:49 +0100 (CET)
Received: from Exchangemail-eme2.itn.ftgroup (unknown [10.114.31.61]) by omfedm07.si.francetelecom.fr (ESMTP service) with ESMTP id AEE734C05D; Wed, 13 Jan 2016 10:31:49 +0100 (CET)
Received: from OPEXCLILMA3.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup ([fe80::60a9:abc3:86e6:2541]) by OPEXCLILM7E.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup ([fe80::b91c:ea2c:ac8a:7462%19]) with mapi id 14.03.0279.002; Wed, 13 Jan 2016 10:31:49 +0100
From: mohamed.boucadair@orange.com
To: "adrian@olddog.co.uk" <adrian@olddog.co.uk>, "i2nsf@ietf.org" <i2nsf@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [I2nsf] Working Group document adoption
Thread-Index: AdFMfpIrlSnoJPdlT7SaF1vgplQ0mQBZoibw
Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2016 09:31:48 +0000
Message-ID: <787AE7BB302AE849A7480A190F8B933008CC9D27@OPEXCLILMA3.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup>
References: <00bc01d14c7e$95eb9690$c1c2c3b0$@olddog.co.uk>
In-Reply-To: <00bc01d14c7e$95eb9690$c1c2c3b0$@olddog.co.uk>
Accept-Language: fr-FR, en-US
Content-Language: fr-FR
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.168.234.5]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-PMX-Version: 6.2.1.2478543, Antispam-Engine: 2.7.2.2107409, Antispam-Data: 2015.12.9.132716
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/i2nsf/UYgiQS5XRIZ8VgXLvqKud8dnXyM>
Subject: Re: [I2nsf] Working Group document adoption
X-BeenThere: i2nsf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "*I2NSF: Interface to Network Security Functions mailing list*" <i2nsf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/i2nsf>, <mailto:i2nsf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/i2nsf/>
List-Post: <mailto:i2nsf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:i2nsf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2nsf>, <mailto:i2nsf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2016 09:31:53 -0000

Dear Adrian, all,

I support the adoption of these drafts. 

As a co-author of the PS I-D, I have no IPR nor I'm aware of any related to it. 

Cheers,
Med

> -----Message d'origine-----
> De : I2nsf [mailto:i2nsf-bounces@ietf.org] De la part de Adrian Farrel
> Envoyé : lundi 11 janvier 2016 15:45
> À : i2nsf@ietf.org
> Objet : [I2nsf] Working Group document adoption
> 
> Hi Working group,
> 
> We had a working group milestone before Christmas to "Adopt use Cases,
> problem
> statement, and gap analysis as WG document".
> 
> Per the discussions in Yokohama, we struggled to compact all of this
> information
> into a single document and plan to move ahead with two documents. The
> first is a
> combined problem statement and use case document, the second is a gap
> analysis
> of existing IETF technologies.
> 
> We checked with the AD and she is happy that we take this approach.
> 
> Sue has been working on this and has posted
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-hares-i2nsf-merged-problem-use-
> cases/
> and
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-hares-i2nsf-gap-analysis/
> 
> These replace
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-hares-i2nsf-use-case-gap-analysis/
> 
> There was some small discussion on the list raising some points that may
> be
> addressed, but I think we can carry on, so this email starts a two week
> poll for
> adoption of these documents as working group drafts. The poll will end on
> January 25th.
> 
> Please read the documents and express an opinion one way or another,
> preferably
> giving a reason for your thoughts.
> 
> Since Linda is a co-author of draft-hares-i2nsf-merged-problem-use-cases,
> I will
> call consensus on that document.
> 
> Thanks,
> Adrian
> 
> _______________________________________________
> I2nsf mailing list
> I2nsf@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2nsf

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email