IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [i2rs] Comments on Ephemeral-REQ-07 (local config vs. ephemeral)

"Joel M. Halpern" <jmh@joelhalpern.com> Wed, 20 July 2016 12:55 UTC

Return-Path: <jmh@joelhalpern.com>
X-Original-To: i2rs@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: i2rs@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D0C812DBE5 for <i2rs@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 20 Jul 2016 05:55:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.702
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.702 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=joelhalpern.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wJtJVMVYzxUA for <i2rs@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 20 Jul 2016 05:55:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from maila2.tigertech.net (maila2.tigertech.net [208.80.4.152]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4EF8F12D614 for <i2rs@ietf.org>; Wed, 20 Jul 2016 05:55:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by maila2.tigertech.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40B37241053; Wed, 20 Jul 2016 05:55:39 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=joelhalpern.com; s=1.tigertech; t=1469019339; bh=YQC9hHyKCjxEMrvBURPOwKlRyNtBqvCRbo9kUWfep7k=; h=Subject:To:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=Uo+/fXWmuWU1ATfj7v7yb1tmPNnOevfj6VU9dbtyka6MUGT9XJUw55VANtOGQDrgP 19+pX59BzTl1mrtXe/ywBz2WUOUOpnACV2yDi3UtqVw4neYaHfCdt0NZfIJKKZDeBy YPpdaOjLevvwQazWYYrF6+h/mRPlRjeMhH0ouwXQ=
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at maila2.tigertech.net
Received: from surfer-172-29-110-137-hotspot.internet-for-guests.com (unknown [62.214.2.210]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by maila2.tigertech.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 47C57240FD7; Wed, 20 Jul 2016 05:55:38 -0700 (PDT)
To: Joe Clarke <jclarke@cisco.com>, Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com>, 'Russ White' <7riw77@gmail.com>, i2rs@ietf.org
References: <3b4hc19ywdtjui9gp6yu90i7.1469014886778@email.android.com> <20160720115932.GA52435@elstar.local> <599d04d1-fdf7-6777-3f61-55cfcba57f89@cisco.com>
From: "Joel M. Halpern" <jmh@joelhalpern.com>
Message-ID: <90f526cd-8de8-60c5-180a-84717558ca5a@joelhalpern.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2016 08:55:35 -0400
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <599d04d1-fdf7-6777-3f61-55cfcba57f89@cisco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/i2rs/AGvMUkok0Gyk4hyb3ojylqnDdZg>
Subject: Re: [i2rs] Comments on Ephemeral-REQ-07 (local config vs. ephemeral)
X-BeenThere: i2rs@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Interface to The Internet Routing System \(IRS\)" <i2rs.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/i2rs>, <mailto:i2rs-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/i2rs/>
List-Post: <mailto:i2rs@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:i2rs-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2rs>, <mailto:i2rs-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2016 12:55:50 -0000

That text works for me.
Thanks,
Joel

On 7/20/16 8:52 AM, Joe Clarke wrote:
> On 7/20/16 07:59, Juergen Schoenwaelder wrote:
>> The text I comment to says "individual ephemeral configuration
>> changes" - I was not able to infer from this that it was supposed to
>> imply "individual I2RS clients".
>
> I agree with both you and Joel.  "Individual" should apply to clients,
> but we need to have something that ties priority to local config.
>
> What about:
>
> Req-07: Local configuration MUST have a priority that is comparable with
> individual I2RS client priorities for making changes.  This priority
> will determine whether local configuration changes or individual
> ephemeral configuration changes take precedence as described in RFC7921.
>  The I2RS protocol MUST support his mechanism.
>
> Joe
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email