IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Ianaplan] What are the RIRs doing?

Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> Mon, 08 September 2014 22:45 UTC

Return-Path: <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A524E1A00EB for <ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 8 Sep 2014 15:45:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5yiB-z2uDO3O for <ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 8 Sep 2014 15:45:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pd0-x22a.google.com (mail-pd0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c02::22a]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E627A1A0545 for <ianaplan@ietf.org>; Mon, 8 Sep 2014 15:44:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pd0-f170.google.com with SMTP id r10so21964569pdi.29 for <ianaplan@ietf.org>; Mon, 08 Sep 2014 15:44:56 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:organization:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=9EDdt8yO46zvTPYcdqCd6QJBim1X26aNTFd+ZhP9cZo=; b=rZ4H6un9VtqEjE3Yo5TI+Ie3ypdM3wgJ1AvtLJjmuf0YS0ZdleGSHx+4gKP9u4ymtJ xlly2W0zr/eyYc+mtUdsRp7AQI3FiWujQ+PCkptKable4ZrGLwZzKgbKiLC381ONlMXq kSnU9h7wVyYv8ZTzt5ZppO2g2odJ0VkyzPhI6Q3K+Aigin8TM7lqtlD61qkwVQ6vNS19 /0z0bu/pkETZFGftIcFrmAi9bZPq+OOin4SYdfWT0OdSZoZCZKQhA694izhWwGIU5AW7 oKRjSRZpvzdh1H0DT4Ccajy9iZCSzEdqpkQVEZCCBx0gBhSQ/4ywt8rvoEp88+6Ok+IR +xkw==
X-Received: by 10.69.18.202 with SMTP id go10mr19513121pbd.84.1410216296615; Mon, 08 Sep 2014 15:44:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.178.23] (21.196.69.111.dynamic.snap.net.nz. [111.69.196.21]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id fm15sm6261396pdb.58.2014.09.08.15.44.54 for <multiple recipients> (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 08 Sep 2014 15:44:56 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <540E316A.6050505@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 09 Sep 2014 10:44:58 +1200
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Organization: University of Auckland
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (Windows/20070728)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Milton L Mueller <mueller@syr.edu>
References: <540DB003.1060900@cisco.com> <a9927883f15b4da7aa03735b5efeae10@EX13-MBX-13.ad.syr.edu> <20140908190223.GM74274@mx1.yitter.info> <46cb2aaf81b4437aa3f570c794e603b7@EX13-MBX-13.ad.syr.edu>
In-Reply-To: <46cb2aaf81b4437aa3f570c794e603b7@EX13-MBX-13.ad.syr.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ianaplan/yrca0myT6CEdLoqNffY3GOLPA30
Cc: "ianaplan@ietf.org" <ianaplan@ietf.org>, "NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU" <NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU>
Subject: Re: [Ianaplan] What are the RIRs doing?
X-BeenThere: ianaplan@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IANA Plan <ianaplan.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ianaplan>, <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ianaplan/>
List-Post: <mailto:ianaplan@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ianaplan>, <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Sep 2014 22:45:12 -0000

On 09/09/2014 07:19, Milton L Mueller wrote:
> If you are convening an open process, you don't start it out with the "house proposal," in which a bunch of guys have decided behind the scenes what they want the outcome to be, and make it the reference point for all future discussion. 
> 
> Let's say the ICG in its RFP had provided a "draft proposal" telling the three operational communities what it thinks would be good for them to propose. You would have no problem with that? 

No. I am quite used to seeing drafts completely transformed during their
passage through a consensus-building process. It's happened often enough
to drafts I've written and I've helped do it to many other people's
drafts. I have been to various RIR meetings over the years and have never
noticed people being reluctant to challenge proposals from the RIR leadership.
I have no discomfort at all with this process.

        Brian

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email