IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Idr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-idr-rs-bfd-03.txt

Job Snijders <job@instituut.net> Mon, 03 July 2017 20:42 UTC

Return-Path: <job@instituut.net>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A4F31200B9 for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 3 Jul 2017 13:42:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=instituut-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1GoOh-vRlMIY for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 3 Jul 2017 13:42:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wr0-x235.google.com (mail-wr0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c0c::235]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DFE4D128BC8 for <idr@ietf.org>; Mon, 3 Jul 2017 13:42:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wr0-x235.google.com with SMTP id r103so239799716wrb.0 for <idr@ietf.org>; Mon, 03 Jul 2017 13:42:26 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=instituut-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=pQWk48Df4j0m6QrsCgN5lNCEvQVhClK1MVwyzhbuxf8=; b=ii5Uwxce3IaHW98NvLucwnXfKDuihf572rOBzZjvAt3ADaFeUbfRCkCizE0BbH5Gs3 zHglHbDR8/wXardRK2GW8LjkiUIojxVfybs3nzNYJwG7UHSwqib5R1hD7i99TDY0k77z Aqz+iuVoj2QkVTIPNffVj4Z8XPd16sFwHynC7g9/9UpqghKeNIU0bUxRCn31XxpH+f4X gTxQzdTAqHGHMlqzmA+SSsZrnNd/dzLWu95qsyajElllzWM8p3mdMB8SD8CXLH+61E8h 5cCDGtwVwBZIhn/VLYGEcNcFYhbjWhtfF/hbWnjuu5JLON4JIFpvohjJq6kE/gBy28iG 0y1g==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=pQWk48Df4j0m6QrsCgN5lNCEvQVhClK1MVwyzhbuxf8=; b=jz3a8gad3Mq1YUc79+muecBvodF9KbqS8/u11SevUm1w3Dx7iSZb/jacA90UGIVv94 /zkyBoa7yfPZfzyRUNd3v6cwNYs9tNAJf/zpH3RXIEpl36gElC78rcZnF0o85HoGTn3a fUheS5t1bMxihTvb7UFJQAuT0Resn8RmlkQJiA8sJyFXkufM+mN9Gh8hRSvpWHxDUXiY Axb2/acgmnA6mNV1uRGA+woiAF65BIq3FLM7h1+752au/oTiG/k9O4v4FYvytRVsb2v4 eT+W7MGsEDQbZLmAvpenpw1wR76958qVfnzCKgKonRKCpEutVjmK+YHqtRwCbCbBEjF/ nkhQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AKS2vOztrTwoNg3dMWvH0shwMttYaX38oV0YC4e5aOfAhVfE+LSEurHM N1YFc6oUZwaQ+aAgFSrCoiIn56RDgPDe
X-Received: by 10.223.175.37 with SMTP id z34mr34091163wrc.11.1499114545286; Mon, 03 Jul 2017 13:42:25 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <149909741417.22786.4679459342587499122@ietfa.amsl.com> <20170703160800.x6wcym2ma6jceqv7@Vurt.local> <FBD5248C-33C6-436C-8B01-FAE2658B0768@juniper.net> <20170703163846.224w6lxvbt4txqub@Vurt.local> <20170703173810.GA45648@Space.Net> <CA+b+ERnM=RYmLFV4QA1mAWVc6Hdmm4_1tVDs7c1QZ6OsZkzxyQ@mail.gmail.com> <20170703202002.GD45648@Space.Net> <CA+b+ERnMaD4r3OZT9kpgJ6pt=e3gSMx83KmbMJc12aeVH3Vcpg@mail.gmail.com> <20170703203800.GE45648@Space.Net>
In-Reply-To: <20170703203800.GE45648@Space.Net>
From: Job Snijders <job@instituut.net>
Date: Mon, 03 Jul 2017 20:42:14 +0000
Message-ID: <CACWOCC_d1pxewNk-y_s8NRFWfUq-g1Ta=4hnF2XBSX091QsaGw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Gert Doering <gert@space.net>, Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net>
Cc: idr wg <idr@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="f403045f5644f31ee305536fcdbd"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/CDuIFwXStwj93xMnsAILBwVEDSc>
Subject: Re: [Idr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-idr-rs-bfd-03.txt
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Jul 2017 20:42:32 -0000

On Mon, 3 Jul 2017 at 22:38, Gert Doering <gert@space.net> wrote:

> On Mon, Jul 03, 2017 at 10:24:39PM +0200, Robert Raszuk wrote:
> > Is result of bfd a telemetry ? Interesting ..
>
> Of course it is, if you tell the results of measurements A->B to C.
>
> Whatever measurement this is.


You are right, any observation of a state can be distributed as a
telemetry.

What I question is whether it is useful (performance or scalability wise)
to have route servers take that particular state into consideration when
doing best path (or multiple best paths) selection on behalf of their peers.

Kind regards,

Job

>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email