IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Idr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-idr-rs-bfd-03.txt

Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net> Wed, 05 July 2017 15:21 UTC

Return-Path: <rraszuk@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7558B131635 for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 5 Jul 2017 08:21:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.399
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.399 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.199, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nta2btdvNzmp for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 5 Jul 2017 08:21:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-it0-x22a.google.com (mail-it0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c0b::22a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B4B46131453 for <idr@ietf.org>; Wed, 5 Jul 2017 08:21:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-it0-x22a.google.com with SMTP id m84so88123534ita.0 for <idr@ietf.org>; Wed, 05 Jul 2017 08:21:30 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc; bh=+fBJ/cUjXDGxvu3/RxNrJvm40CXTrIvMYR08CmQMKaU=; b=K1wbgUVSuIqlOFBnghauxDFvrtfeNYFTah536fW0s8OwBt0PZpzD4kqw5B4jR9GLt2 DxNu8Oi0T7GjEJdTGbEgEYnG+ywlE6TCcdr5P0wusInBm/qE0gWJW8ZYpjKbv38zrLrx HClo2YCAWGangWk05j84AoiaRuZXhGjVbgDa2HQEmtJ/sRPYlNz9gGgVi8Z8FyiWsBaG HkS5Mz2l3suIwlIem52Zh6IujWDjZnipaD/lE0oLqMl3g7NE/g+R2x9848KfZMWITzyB Baevh2ouc/YH4MZ2isRdz4WxKzWRu4o2Y02MidZ7OB5VRlWljpgHE6aDH9tzMfJmTZJu QNXA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=+fBJ/cUjXDGxvu3/RxNrJvm40CXTrIvMYR08CmQMKaU=; b=mUh1YumzLzc+u81OnEiPL+cF/9fGX9Qa7OW0Ndgp7fANJQ48slfxXOJCEErVH8nwAQ wWdNBd+MH8e2xlPwf4r6IBbueaeYr22qfRmFE+5Gi/QBLic+lZ3ScErU++cFQhbwF0fE uTNYQR19OpgsrzhOs+ruD4ecv7liAzDX49sI044Y3RZPeLB+XoB6gbWHVoAfo5Vvewyb yziZEXwSRTJKZAfM1R1OQCYE0Lpv+S1u1dmrLA7O7tf4aXlVvRpXDntw5od3F/j7lGTN dSZb1vJmhB8B6rta6+DKUAA/U0VBQzF36iWUrax+hadI17QrW7LXH3ELQF5QHQnux0od cNng==
X-Gm-Message-State: AIVw1112pVYo8miycy8VjONFxPr7B0HwqjbgO91SEG3wpSbFrTV2au9l 5HCq66sRql9N6uDy4JnibkAI0oCd2rqS
X-Received: by 10.36.20.137 with SMTP id 131mr20139437itg.104.1499268090016; Wed, 05 Jul 2017 08:21:30 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: rraszuk@gmail.com
Received: by 10.79.32.15 with HTTP; Wed, 5 Jul 2017 08:21:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.79.32.15 with HTTP; Wed, 5 Jul 2017 08:21:28 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CA+b+ER=js646xptuJkkbftoe5fosHeRUh8q=jOvv1YPY7i_86A@mail.gmail.com>
References: <m2van9z3jp.wl-randy@psg.com> <CACWOCC8tPVD20SJ60h-=NGbPMG3Fae2a0TY5rMFb=EnN7H-C6Q@mail.gmail.com> <m2o9t1z1hj.wl-randy@psg.com> <CACWOCC_bQitHeR9tHc5tPsXmoSDDLQH764equTAHrP854fYh-A@mail.gmail.com> <BF65C4DC-D2F5-41AF-8454-D43B403E328B@juniper.net> <CACWOCC9cmz7ARnWNowCCEu3Rt_NiyuWgJMZ3pWfmxZ_BO8Ovjw@mail.gmail.com> <292534ED-98BC-49A0-82A2-45B6688F851D@juniper.net> <CACWOCC_KTzJLQAJf_j4ZqM1oJSFq9JcyT7aAPLGf3+2Ess7BBA@mail.gmail.com> <09BFF794-6899-4DA5-8EF5-DDF86513BFBA@pfrc.org> <20170704104840.mg5bflnmmjlv4jbi@Vurt.local> <20170704175334.GO2289@pfrc.org> <CA+b+ER=js646xptuJkkbftoe5fosHeRUh8q=jOvv1YPY7i_86A@mail.gmail.com>
From: Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net>
Date: Wed, 05 Jul 2017 17:21:28 +0200
X-Google-Sender-Auth: 7O9HnEMXMhZoeVsusrcUjxfdtZ8
Message-ID: <CA+b+ERmKGVmLi8Ex1CMUXjzdxjNiJMHDBPe-Wndpm1mMQrNGwQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: PFRC - jhaas <jhaas@pfrc.org>
Cc: idr wg <idr@ietf.org>, Job Snijders <job@ntt.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a1143e196edbb4c0553938dd4"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/xha9wSut0BAbRlEIekAyYIjrL9M>
Subject: Re: [Idr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-idr-rs-bfd-03.txt
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Jul 2017 15:21:32 -0000

Jeff,

> What I don't understand is why you
> object to someone else doing
> something different.

The draft proposes a solution which does not allow to locally repair paths.
That is my biggest issue with this draft.

Solutions which do allow for local repairs are available so why don't we
encorage their use instead of inventing alternatives ?

As to doing something different by someone else is there a pointer to
existing implementations of this wg proposal ?

Are those implementations able to support add-paths ?

Thx,
R.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email