IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Idr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-idr-rs-bfd-03.txt

Gert Doering <gert@space.net> Mon, 03 July 2017 17:38 UTC

Return-Path: <gert@space.net>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9F181316DB for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 3 Jul 2017 10:38:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.601
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.601 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5pcpFs7nEegj for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 3 Jul 2017 10:38:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mobil.space.net (mobil.space.net [IPv6:2001:608:2:81::67]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 039731316AB for <idr@ietf.org>; Mon, 3 Jul 2017 10:38:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: idr@ietf.org
Received: from mobil.space.net (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by mobil.space.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9BC441B94 for <idr@ietf.org>; Mon, 3 Jul 2017 19:38:10 +0200 (CEST)
X-SpaceNet-Relay: true
X-SpaceNet-Relay: true
X-SpaceNet-Relay: true
Received: from moebius4.space.net (moebius4.space.net [IPv6:2001:608:2:2::251]) by mobil.space.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id C27E041B73; Mon, 3 Jul 2017 19:38:10 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by moebius4.space.net (Postfix, from userid 1007) id BF5BB1718F; Mon, 3 Jul 2017 19:38:10 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Mon, 03 Jul 2017 19:38:10 +0200
From: Gert Doering <gert@space.net>
To: Job Snijders <job@ntt.net>
Cc: "John G. Scudder" <jgs@juniper.net>, idr@ietf.org
Message-ID: <20170703173810.GA45648@Space.Net>
References: <149909741417.22786.4679459342587499122@ietfa.amsl.com> <20170703160800.x6wcym2ma6jceqv7@Vurt.local> <FBD5248C-33C6-436C-8B01-FAE2658B0768@juniper.net> <20170703163846.224w6lxvbt4txqub@Vurt.local>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20170703163846.224w6lxvbt4txqub@Vurt.local>
X-NCC-RegID: de.space
User-Agent: Mutt/1.8.2 (2017-04-18)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/KMrQhKouw2Re4Msuw3sLiERb6Ug>
Subject: Re: [Idr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-idr-rs-bfd-03.txt
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Jul 2017 17:38:24 -0000

Hi,

On Mon, Jul 03, 2017 at 06:38:46PM +0200, Job Snijders wrote:
> I look forward to hearing counterpoints as to why it is useful to
> communicate reachability state back to the route server, and how the
> authors (or other working group participants) envision the scalability
> cost aspect.

I find this a useful point for telemetry so the IXP operator can know
"there is loss of connectivity between participant".

Also, it enables best-path selection on the route-server to pick other
paths if available.

Gert Doering
        -- NetMaster
-- 
have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?

SpaceNet AG                        Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14          Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen                   HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444           USt-IdNr.: DE813185279

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email