IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Idr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-idr-rs-bfd-03.txt

Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net> Wed, 05 July 2017 08:29 UTC

Return-Path: <rraszuk@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 828BF131B30 for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 5 Jul 2017 01:29:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.398
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.398 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.199, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AwusUI8Zs3cE for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 5 Jul 2017 01:29:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-io0-x22c.google.com (mail-io0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c06::22c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5FAC7131B34 for <idr@ietf.org>; Wed, 5 Jul 2017 01:29:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-io0-x22c.google.com with SMTP id z62so81838907ioi.3 for <idr@ietf.org>; Wed, 05 Jul 2017 01:29:44 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc; bh=oiUb83mebApxyor7W0Q1MOZUJ8GVGDkHWJ3zsFGBPvA=; b=sGBtlZh+wdSMc3vmO3Z1nUwEDYVI7QYzoQaQFaVV1Z6KcuwlDPbz+wScTUUvqXbd8l DgKfcfjM3mMjuZrweRmTCExWgvIYrcHuo2HOPH2aa3w497spJDkNXlCQ47PaLrZPy2ZE sXYFEqtRjTYPTSJv3MdplS6BDq2YpWjEPmQkSAVtsUmHJGGxbwi3i8tkRcrr8OjJgxxD aPoisiReuaXrXsG3YztUvVq9/ztbO5zM7xGIclK46lPYCzRoLJg4w68juTCf4u6LA6/w 8kqha0dXXQ88gqy1J6Q2c6wOCVr0JKl3bM/XD2kLC5woXMAZoqFfqsTMRiAqdtdnphgU GXwg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=oiUb83mebApxyor7W0Q1MOZUJ8GVGDkHWJ3zsFGBPvA=; b=hSeuMD45Ysryb/HfU1TLJ+g8bXRsnPINJ6ve6NgvpOK6rSd6+LRoykGagjMzIVBRig Cco1M0IVW0pR5yWGiQ1evUd9/heffwDCyTXArI23KaksRQX9nzi2Q31rwHaseg/t/I+/ 31E/cz6FCLcebuqjZ8KoAK2qfjEptEDWPlcJ37zpo41V5P2JzW4bSS2kQw269Ma8kC1j lJNijhwOmioqNenmPPIZ8p3fZBrhZgYVo4okyY3kteyKLcBk+3YksRCuzPt5bRF1Um1i C58luqKQtTt7smXYttwxIRB6ge0uA9wOXoO7NBZyPpPscgqEq6W0O0R+mbgSEm70hV46 K5Dw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AIVw111p0kExSJDYlxQPoyACsYCIB9w9DAFa9AqLUtHt7PaWEUUojsa4 7s2OQEbgxVD8j6+Ryu5t2C5QAAU6Xg==
X-Received: by 10.107.140.145 with SMTP id o139mr24472974iod.155.1499243383552; Wed, 05 Jul 2017 01:29:43 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: rraszuk@gmail.com
Received: by 10.79.32.15 with HTTP; Wed, 5 Jul 2017 01:29:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.79.32.15 with HTTP; Wed, 5 Jul 2017 01:29:41 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CA+b+ERk3VWc3tw8oNNdDGAU3G3PJv0ne32KS=UMhaGsDYVZHcA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <m2van9z3jp.wl-randy@psg.com> <CACWOCC8tPVD20SJ60h-=NGbPMG3Fae2a0TY5rMFb=EnN7H-C6Q@mail.gmail.com> <m2o9t1z1hj.wl-randy@psg.com> <CACWOCC_bQitHeR9tHc5tPsXmoSDDLQH764equTAHrP854fYh-A@mail.gmail.com> <BF65C4DC-D2F5-41AF-8454-D43B403E328B@juniper.net> <CACWOCC9cmz7ARnWNowCCEu3Rt_NiyuWgJMZ3pWfmxZ_BO8Ovjw@mail.gmail.com> <292534ED-98BC-49A0-82A2-45B6688F851D@juniper.net> <CACWOCC_KTzJLQAJf_j4ZqM1oJSFq9JcyT7aAPLGf3+2Ess7BBA@mail.gmail.com> <09BFF794-6899-4DA5-8EF5-DDF86513BFBA@pfrc.org> <20170704104840.mg5bflnmmjlv4jbi@Vurt.local> <20170704175334.GO2289@pfrc.org> <CA+b+ER=bM_GoFHaRuWtPjp_14i+nTgwwR0iqEN5Pq+wevHUpJw@mail.gmail.com> <B2685E35-3B5F-44EA-ACCA-90F2A1863209@pfrc.org> <CA+b+ERk3VWc3tw8oNNdDGAU3G3PJv0ne32KS=UMhaGsDYVZHcA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net>
Date: Wed, 05 Jul 2017 10:29:41 +0200
X-Google-Sender-Auth: CHL8k_kQ0baCzjiSXTa8FsjcY3Q
Message-ID: <CA+b+ERm-ZiHCzxtyJuXcr7BbLtK8DnvhOgM7V9VZQmZratSytw@mail.gmail.com>
To: PFRC - jhaas <jhaas@pfrc.org>
Cc: idr wg <idr@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="94eb2c05a5444f001d05538dcdd4"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/TofksCdqQIb_aS9G5LostPqIjiE>
Subject: Re: [Idr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-idr-rs-bfd-03.txt
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Jul 2017 08:29:46 -0000

Neither did I.

Add-paths is for all clients while signalled bfd state of remote nhs is per
client.

And this is the issue.

Thx
R.

On Jul 5, 2017 04:47, "Jeffrey Haas" <jhaas@pfrc.org> wrote:


> On Jul 4, 2017, at 8:27 PM, Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net> wrote:
>
> Jeff,
>
> Running add paths for common policy paths vs per client best path are
orders of magnitude more work.
>
> I can not believe why you would think otherwise ...

At no point did I state add-paths would be per client.
_______________________________________________
Idr mailing list
Idr@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email