Re: [Idr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-idr-rs-bfd-03.txt
Job Snijders <job@ntt.net> Mon, 03 July 2017 20:27 UTC
Return-Path: <job@ntt.net>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B957E120724 for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 3 Jul 2017 13:27:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id B6IXYBNU9cET for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 3 Jul 2017 13:27:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail3.mlpsca01.us.to.gin.ntt.net (mail3.mlpsca01.us.to.gin.ntt.net [IPv6:2001:418:3ff:3::22]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B480D1200B9 for <idr@ietf.org>; Mon, 3 Jul 2017 13:27:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail3.mlpsca01.us.to.gin.ntt.net with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256:128) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from <job@ntt.net>) id 1dS7wS-0005wb-HF (job@us.ntt.net) for idr@ietf.org; Mon, 03 Jul 2017 20:27:32 +0000
Received: by mail-wr0-f180.google.com with SMTP id c11so239626179wrc.3 for <idr@ietf.org>; Mon, 03 Jul 2017 13:27:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Gm-Message-State: AKS2vOx/D3l7KHYNx4EHJC7it3tRWJ76yfR4Ai2bp4H97Qr1Ixdu3hLu x3nt4AUm73a0Yb3foNeqv25XRWKJlSpO
X-Received: by 10.223.175.37 with SMTP id z34mr34069324wrc.11.1499113651129; Mon, 03 Jul 2017 13:27:31 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <149909741417.22786.4679459342587499122@ietfa.amsl.com> <20170703160800.x6wcym2ma6jceqv7@Vurt.local> <FBD5248C-33C6-436C-8B01-FAE2658B0768@juniper.net> <20170703163846.224w6lxvbt4txqub@Vurt.local> <m2wp7pz3ld.wl-randy@psg.com>
In-Reply-To: <m2wp7pz3ld.wl-randy@psg.com>
From: Job Snijders <job@ntt.net>
Date: Mon, 03 Jul 2017 20:27:20 +0000
X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: <CACWOCC-=B-08FG6No0muVdOwXWdtm2JkuiM1MFYFY=6B4m9MSw@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CACWOCC-=B-08FG6No0muVdOwXWdtm2JkuiM1MFYFY=6B4m9MSw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Job Snijders <job@ntt.net>, Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
Cc: idr@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="f403045f5644a7613805536f9842"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/bxOCs4V_jaOaYxDoTLDWtKKNAyo>
Subject: Re: [Idr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-idr-rs-bfd-03.txt
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Jul 2017 20:27:35 -0000
On Mon, 3 Jul 2017 at 22:07, Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> wrote: > > Ah, yes of course WG consensus is important. I had assumed that the > > authors were expressing their 100% agreement with all my points through > > silence. ;-) > > actually, you atacked the style and tone of my response, so i gave up. I'm not sure I know what you are referring to. I sent feedback on the draft to the list (in a fresh thread) and only received a response from Robert Raszuk. If I discouraged dialogue on this topic in some way, please point me to it and allow me an opportunity to apologize for doing so. we have long experience (can you say DataKit?) with bad failures and hard > debugging of partial data plane connectivity interacting with lack of > knowledge of the control plane. Yes. But a route server will never be a full replacement for regular bilateral sessions, so that will always remain. If the implication is that the technology (full state available to the RS) is critical in the maintenance and operation of the IXP itself, it should clearly state so. This would be new information to me though. As a generalized mechanism, IXPs could snoop BFD traffic to disseminate the current state of reachability on the fabric, such BFD snooping would work for both RS peers as well as bilateral peers. A question would be "why impose additional reporting duties (load) on the RS peers when the IXP can glean similar information through snooping"? when my router's packets can not reach you, or vice versa, i *really* want > to learn a better place to send them. Yes. But how does statement show that the route server itself must be kept appraised on who can reach who? Kind regards, Job >
- [Idr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-idr-rs-bfd-03.txt internet-drafts
- Re: [Idr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-idr-rs-bfd-03.txt John G. Scudder
- Re: [Idr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-idr-rs-bfd-03.txt Job Snijders
- Re: [Idr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-idr-rs-bfd-03.txt John G. Scudder
- Re: [Idr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-idr-rs-bfd-03.txt Job Snijders
- Re: [Idr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-idr-rs-bfd-03.txt Gert Doering
- Re: [Idr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-idr-rs-bfd-03.txt Job Snijders
- Re: [Idr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-idr-rs-bfd-03.txt Randy Bush
- Re: [Idr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-idr-rs-bfd-03.txt Randy Bush
- Re: [Idr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-idr-rs-bfd-03.txt Robert Raszuk
- Re: [Idr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-idr-rs-bfd-03.txt Gert Doering
- Re: [Idr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-idr-rs-bfd-03.txt Robert Raszuk
- Re: [Idr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-idr-rs-bfd-03.txt Robert Raszuk
- Re: [Idr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-idr-rs-bfd-03.txt Job Snijders
- Re: [Idr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-idr-rs-bfd-03.txt Job Snijders
- Re: [Idr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-idr-rs-bfd-03.txt Gert Doering
- Re: [Idr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-idr-rs-bfd-03.txt Job Snijders
- Re: [Idr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-idr-rs-bfd-03.txt Randy Bush
- Re: [Idr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-idr-rs-bfd-03.txt Job Snijders
- Re: [Idr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-idr-rs-bfd-03.txt John G. Scudder
- Re: [Idr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-idr-rs-bfd-03.txt Job Snijders
- Re: [Idr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-idr-rs-bfd-03.txt John Scudder
- Re: [Idr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-idr-rs-bfd-03.txt Job Snijders
- Re: [Idr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-idr-rs-bfd-03.txt Jeffrey Haas
- Re: [Idr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-idr-rs-bfd-03.txt Robert Raszuk
- Re: [Idr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-idr-rs-bfd-03.txt Robert Raszuk
- Re: [Idr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-idr-rs-bfd-03.txt Jeffrey Haas
- Re: [Idr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-idr-rs-bfd-03.txt Robert Raszuk
- Re: [Idr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-idr-rs-bfd-03.txt Robert Raszuk
- Re: [Idr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-idr-rs-bfd-03.txt John Scudder
- Re: [Idr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-idr-rs-bfd-03.txt Gert Doering
- Re: [Idr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-idr-rs-bfd-03.txt Gert Doering
- Re: [Idr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-idr-rs-bfd-03.txt Robert Raszuk
- Re: [Idr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-idr-rs-bfd-03.txt Job Snijders
- Re: [Idr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-idr-rs-bfd-03.txt Job Snijders
- Re: [Idr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-idr-rs-bfd-03.txt Robert Raszuk
- Re: [Idr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-idr-rs-bfd-03.txt John G. Scudder
- Re: [Idr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-idr-rs-bfd-03.txt John G. Scudder
- Re: [Idr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-idr-rs-bfd-03.txt Jeffrey Haas
- Re: [Idr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-idr-rs-bfd-03.txt Jeffrey Haas
- Re: [Idr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-idr-rs-bfd-03.txt Jeffrey Haas
- Re: [Idr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-idr-rs-bfd-03.txt Jeffrey Haas
- Re: [Idr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-idr-rs-bfd-03.txt Job Snijders
- Re: [Idr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-idr-rs-bfd-03.txt Job Snijders
- Re: [Idr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-idr-rs-bfd-03.txt Jared Mauch
- Re: [Idr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-idr-rs-bfd-03.txt Jeffrey Haas
- Re: [Idr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-idr-rs-bfd-03.txt Jeffrey Haas
- Re: [Idr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-idr-rs-bfd-03.txt Jeffrey Haas
- Re: [Idr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-idr-rs-bfd-03.txt Job Snijders
- Re: [Idr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-idr-rs-bfd-03.txt Jeffrey Haas
- Re: [Idr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-idr-rs-bfd-03.txt Robert Raszuk
- Re: [Idr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-idr-rs-bfd-03.txt Robert Raszuk
- Re: [Idr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-idr-rs-bfd-03.txt Jeffrey Haas
- Re: [Idr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-idr-rs-bfd-03.txt Robert Raszuk
- Re: [Idr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-idr-rs-bfd-03.txt Robert Raszuk
- Re: [Idr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-idr-rs-bfd-03.txt Robert Raszuk
- Re: [Idr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-idr-rs-bfd-03.txt John Scudder
- Re: [Idr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-idr-rs-bfd-03.txt John G. Scudder
- Re: [Idr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-idr-rs-bfd-03.txt Robert Raszuk
- Re: [Idr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-idr-rs-bfd-03.txt John G. Scudder
- Re: [Idr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-idr-rs-bfd-03.txt Jakob Heitz (jheitz)
- Re: [Idr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-idr-rs-bfd-03.txt Robert Raszuk
- Re: [Idr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-idr-rs-bfd-03.txt John Scudder
- Re: [Idr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-idr-rs-bfd-03.txt Jakob Heitz (jheitz)
- Re: [Idr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-idr-rs-bfd-03.txt Randy Bush
- Re: [Idr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-idr-rs-bfd-03.txt John Scudder
- Re: [Idr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-idr-rs-bfd-03.txt Jakob Heitz (jheitz)
- Re: [Idr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-idr-rs-bfd-03.txt Jakob Heitz (jheitz)
- Re: [Idr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-idr-rs-bfd-03.txt Jeffrey Haas
- Re: [Idr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-idr-rs-bfd-03.txt Jeffrey Haas
- Re: [Idr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-idr-rs-bfd-03.txt Jakob Heitz (jheitz)
- Re: [Idr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-idr-rs-bfd-03.txt Robert Raszuk
- Re: [Idr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-idr-rs-bfd-03.txt Jakob Heitz (jheitz)
- Re: [Idr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-idr-rs-bfd-03.txt Arnold Nipper
- Re: [Idr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-idr-rs-bfd-03.txt Robert Raszuk