IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Idr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-idr-rs-bfd-03.txt

Job Snijders <job@ntt.net> Mon, 03 July 2017 20:29 UTC

Return-Path: <job@ntt.net>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 569A1131455 for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 3 Jul 2017 13:29:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kQMtGRPwvckb for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 3 Jul 2017 13:29:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail3.dllstx09.us.to.gin.ntt.net (mail3.dllstx09.us.to.gin.ntt.net [IPv6:2001:418:3ff:5::26]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F32BF1270B4 for <idr@ietf.org>; Mon, 3 Jul 2017 13:29:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail3.dllstx09.us.to.gin.ntt.net with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256:128) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from <job@ntt.net>) id 1dS7yg-000Ey9-G1 (job@us.ntt.net) for idr@ietf.org; Mon, 03 Jul 2017 20:29:50 +0000
Received: by mail-wm0-f42.google.com with SMTP id w126so178074937wme.0 for <idr@ietf.org>; Mon, 03 Jul 2017 13:29:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Gm-Message-State: AKS2vOxRFMC8hyOjGB7M1BI6zjcpPZHiQDqp6ViWhp5/pKiTHZt6+RXo qbLsRmNrutnAmhUK3GzEpZyEWbXgFJQS
X-Received: by 10.28.22.6 with SMTP id 6mr26576298wmw.124.1499113789096; Mon, 03 Jul 2017 13:29:49 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <149909741417.22786.4679459342587499122@ietfa.amsl.com> <20170703160800.x6wcym2ma6jceqv7@Vurt.local> <FBD5248C-33C6-436C-8B01-FAE2658B0768@juniper.net> <20170703163846.224w6lxvbt4txqub@Vurt.local> <20170703173810.GA45648@Space.Net> <20170703175308.hembxkplaniz66wb@Vurt.local> <m2van9z3jp.wl-randy@psg.com>
In-Reply-To: <m2van9z3jp.wl-randy@psg.com>
From: Job Snijders <job@ntt.net>
Date: Mon, 03 Jul 2017 20:29:37 +0000
X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: <CACWOCC8tPVD20SJ60h-=NGbPMG3Fae2a0TY5rMFb=EnN7H-C6Q@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CACWOCC8tPVD20SJ60h-=NGbPMG3Fae2a0TY5rMFb=EnN7H-C6Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: Job Snijders <job@ntt.net>, Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
Cc: Gert Doering <gert@space.net>, idr@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a114702a4e09d0305536fa0ee"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/PmBYdkrEiQFOEOWQ8NaytmufClY>
Subject: Re: [Idr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-idr-rs-bfd-03.txt
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Jul 2017 20:29:52 -0000

On Mon, 3 Jul 2017 at 22:08, Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> wrote:

> > I'd argue that "it is may be interesting to know this" is a weaker
> > argument then "without this knowledge the technology doesnt work".
>
> without this knowledge, betting my ass on route serves doesn't work.



I don't follow. If the route server facilitates you in setting up BFD to
all "nexthops of interest", the route server's job is done, right? Any RS
peer has the ability to locally verify reacahbility across the fabric and
route accordingly.

Kind regards,

Job

>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email