IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Idr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-idr-rs-bfd-03.txt

Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net> Mon, 03 July 2017 22:39 UTC

Return-Path: <rraszuk@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE762131693 for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 3 Jul 2017 15:39:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.698
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.698 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.199, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id L-9Lw12IbTv6 for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 3 Jul 2017 15:39:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-io0-x230.google.com (mail-io0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c06::230]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2057B129562 for <idr@ietf.org>; Mon, 3 Jul 2017 15:39:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-io0-x230.google.com with SMTP id h134so63345454iof.2 for <idr@ietf.org>; Mon, 03 Jul 2017 15:39:14 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc; bh=Hmm/s3o47VtzQ8DWi3jpVWeTnWdqyODIjakFdsFwKPA=; b=OHQDhUXs6kLL0nwDb5SFO34qD/mRuphpsp+cXdKKMxGJZ3BRQoQ/6YnrWusTAW/Pzj 9YpNiFmTyEvcyc9phjUaKOWc6oSnmRw3xAx0MOa4ecy5tGvQeQ33Fd2rQsq1VYWDtRvK Hx5i7wBAiFm0aJnet218FWWZxQLpVOlVzDNAj7hAx6l7PEEk4JAnq7Q/bcEwhQI5lG5J eJ8SYfx9T8ESC2ex44GO20hJLRvj7aBIxpnlbMGbJMbZ43W7jV1qiWKDPfzwDApFCqs3 a3IC/9nOglKifhq3+Drz+LSLNW7Be9uptnChOL5nshiYk2uNIn/OEYu5mSuK7p3IGnTJ BkRQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=Hmm/s3o47VtzQ8DWi3jpVWeTnWdqyODIjakFdsFwKPA=; b=rlWXrq4NR97inFziYWmNgb3D0l2rUEElkrw9ubISHLWlT83hlzfn4rhcRV1Q7BdvIm AufvB1F/ioQ9alNZwr0uLGj68B0n2+XZFkPVydM04fQ4CD+g31ZG/uUmU51rHVdd27oe K1RhrZWd5RYg3/Sx02cTepHdMsfaNBw3U/y3Rs6OryNhu8CFecgEovJg3340gXjIxrxR wuQgJYGWiK+FqwZ560OzfRgpxSTmdj31nO2c6jJTaYI3i8o6AXiGE6l+YXC3fN0LGyAu v6v8znyTAQ6diotMgkCiO/PO1Aq4dSxRXPeANW2ocVb/WNlAKixYV5RDyOyGtyuQpXWz 1n/g==
X-Gm-Message-State: AKS2vOx7M6lUDuYBvKVK5t0mAIBRyTuX9eeNRgwsLZnutJtOp5bMcBW6 eK30MlZlVGefKPlsv76C+AMrn8pNYA==
X-Received: by 10.107.128.30 with SMTP id b30mr24266944iod.179.1499121553492; Mon, 03 Jul 2017 15:39:13 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: rraszuk@gmail.com
Received: by 10.79.32.15 with HTTP; Mon, 3 Jul 2017 15:39:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.79.32.15 with HTTP; Mon, 3 Jul 2017 15:39:12 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <2F52A154-3F75-4DC9-9DBF-7C8047F65288@pfrc.org>
References: <149909741417.22786.4679459342587499122@ietfa.amsl.com> <20170703160800.x6wcym2ma6jceqv7@Vurt.local> <FBD5248C-33C6-436C-8B01-FAE2658B0768@juniper.net> <20170703163846.224w6lxvbt4txqub@Vurt.local> <20170703173810.GA45648@Space.Net> <20170703175308.hembxkplaniz66wb@Vurt.local> <m2van9z3jp.wl-randy@psg.com> <CACWOCC8tPVD20SJ60h-=NGbPMG3Fae2a0TY5rMFb=EnN7H-C6Q@mail.gmail.com> <m2o9t1z1hj.wl-randy@psg.com> <CACWOCC_bQitHeR9tHc5tPsXmoSDDLQH764equTAHrP854fYh-A@mail.gmail.com> <BF65C4DC-D2F5-41AF-8454-D43B403E328B@juniper.net> <CACWOCC9cmz7ARnWNowCCEu3Rt_NiyuWgJMZ3pWfmxZ_BO8Ovjw@mail.gmail.com> <292534ED-98BC-49A0-82A2-45B6688F851D@juniper.net> <CACWOCC_KTzJLQAJf_j4ZqM1oJSFq9JcyT7aAPLGf3+2Ess7BBA@mail.gmail.com> <09BFF794-6899-4DA5-8EF5-DDF86513BFBA@pfrc.org> <CA+b+ERmQzFrebD-0WHgV2L3E5XwQZQgfnf1HxnoMK+6ew2WJxw@mail.gmail.com> <2F52A154-3F75-4DC9-9DBF-7C8047F65288@pfrc.org>
From: Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net>
Date: Tue, 04 Jul 2017 00:39:12 +0200
X-Google-Sender-Auth: KywYmAQRMqlR2aRdVx8t031gLSE
Message-ID: <CA+b+ERmnYdh0BMu06p2ok9J1FWgYd5T1vufVct9MyoSmq1_WZA@mail.gmail.com>
To: PFRC - jhaas <jhaas@pfrc.org>
Cc: Job Snijders <job@ntt.net>, idr wg <idr@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a113f8b12abd51f0553716f1a"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/JNQaWNUHz9zixGZXoe5jKVIzgEA>
Subject: Re: [Idr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-idr-rs-bfd-03.txt
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Jul 2017 22:39:17 -0000

I never questioned connectivity check between clients.

I question  (similar to Job's observation) to put RS in the middle of the
repair chain of events.

Thx,
R.

PS. I do recommend we focus on the problem rather then going personal on
who understands IX env better.

On Jul 4, 2017 00:33, "Jeffrey Haas" <jhaas@pfrc.org> wrote:

>
> On Jul 3, 2017, at 6:31 PM, Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net> wrote:
>
> What this is about is really a new idea of sdn controller with bgp and
> distributed bfd for weak clients.
>
>
> Regardless of what you might think of the idea of signaling back to the RS
> to permit the RS to bias its own route selection, if you think the
> connectivity test to the nexthop is of little value, you haven't done
> nearly enough work with IXPs.
>
> -- Jeff
>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email