IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Idr] AD Review of draft-ietf-idr-tunnel-encaps-15

Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com> Fri, 15 May 2020 18:31 UTC

Return-Path: <aretana.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 728DD3A005D; Fri, 15 May 2020 11:31:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.096
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.096 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Pzyhg09eYahN; Fri, 15 May 2020 11:31:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wr1-x42f.google.com (mail-wr1-x42f.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::42f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ECC513A005B; Fri, 15 May 2020 11:31:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wr1-x42f.google.com with SMTP id j5so4677004wrq.2; Fri, 15 May 2020 11:31:51 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=MrPxPNDCJATMbv/cw8l81QzBPJnuzlR8spaOU09XQvI=; b=syBF3vFDJrgmpEfRE8eAYF0s1Bnr7HzDh7H55KZQ5CHZsgyBbhDpoqBAua5Z95okWA Zkw9AofHVBYv2REyv4NzMA8gi7Zq6ciZOg7DE4sucSC35GEvO5U2N2UXNNeTXuAVZYBP z/+e+hVw2mDlAFgVAJu1vYZQoBIM8jupt4drkNloObeTSzCgyqj8aUQ+cdGbuNOCK1Cm mb5XYaD9hMJNKUrOfm1guKEQ+QP7uV1OODj60DOv9S8EhBvEzPB1cc9qcAiX+TprjPwn TgCO/GgVdwaKaoy+7HGq1sZ1RCrk3E3slUgaf0wNNs1M4CGNbHOGdjhhqo2QkOxe4d79 6SBA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=MrPxPNDCJATMbv/cw8l81QzBPJnuzlR8spaOU09XQvI=; b=KkshjpYh/V/C5/uADsOEwXMkcD+EmfwD1cSoWfIKGHZbL0ngdVkcM3/cZ/lLr1V7Nv p0o6neVXUrSCfwZQFojgeTbwbPCuY2wp6kohb9ILhqeew5GS1G9LiP+bj9B3/qeGUEHK m/Lp4gUTtk9m4JLq/o+qEAWyLT3OXpO/5wpS8dcstuu5OQCZ6MibmUT5KFRztNHS00UG qkB1ZLuFza4YF4AGlZ1viUdGhOSpY+fVAwu3YRCiy7s3WTXaG77CvzWru9abNyAZuOFH DXUCaixVrDQJkjNvYWikrJb/vQBDlQt6IHC/fPSlsX+87pcbT8NyyjdGkbgz4ZHB810j d0Vg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530A+/8UDHNg1vDUlrYtcD0FtX6lpY/AEdjwzpJOcsDqUdmf99YJ KXlXXyXNGyNmvQnmeNED1X20h0ES8kMzoGVYakWtBelG
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyZb2c31hzMpvErQsV4WOidrxKYPVPpxqtn0+wzcSAne02b/MwuSssfbmi8c6rbfjUI0zkz4tsVlGOp2/irfFw=
X-Received: by 2002:a5d:5183:: with SMTP id k3mr5567899wrv.159.1589567510410; Fri, 15 May 2020 11:31:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 1058052472880 named unknown by gmailapi.google.com with HTTPREST; Fri, 15 May 2020 11:31:49 -0700
From: Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <D6F74C0F-3332-491B-B730-05613356B1BA@juniper.net>
References: <CAMMESsw09LGWWhqyJ_0=jRimUN+_UuCjaXHCdqF9zkpaxSQgVQ@mail.gmail.com> <D6F74C0F-3332-491B-B730-05613356B1BA@juniper.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Fri, 15 May 2020 11:31:49 -0700
Message-ID: <CAMMESsz+pcY0p6zKHOef9j2x_cTD_c4z875p+1qJpTv6F0rONA@mail.gmail.com>
To: John Scudder <jgs@juniper.net>
Cc: "idr-chairs@ietf.org" <idr-chairs@ietf.org>, "idr@ietf. org" <idr@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-idr-tunnel-encaps@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-idr-tunnel-encaps@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000cdfa7a05a5b40650"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/WAyFRSQS2G5ZXBQjCrMT1oDn3bQ>
Subject: Re: [Idr] AD Review of draft-ietf-idr-tunnel-encaps-15
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 May 2020 18:31:54 -0000

Yeah…I think you’re right.

Thanks!

Alvaro.

On May 7, 2020 at 2:51:22 PM, John Scudder (jgs@juniper.net) wrote:

Hi Alvaro,

On Feb 21, 2020, at 7:47 AM, Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:

[minor] "topmost" and "bottommost" are not mentioned in rfc3032.
Please be consistent with the terminology.  It is ok to introduce new
terminology, if needed, but please explain that as well.


RFC 3032 is careful in defining what “top” and “bottom” mean for labels of
course. Don’t you think the meanings of “topmost” and “bottommost” are
obvious in that context?

—John

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email