IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Idr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-idr-rs-bfd-03.txt

Job Snijders <job@ntt.net> Tue, 04 July 2017 18:14 UTC

Return-Path: <job@instituut.net>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3244C13272C for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 4 Jul 2017 11:14:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.419
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.419 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM=0.5] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fwbXj3wSWvny for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 4 Jul 2017 11:14:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wm0-f49.google.com (mail-wm0-f49.google.com [74.125.82.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2B01C13272B for <idr@ietf.org>; Tue, 4 Jul 2017 11:14:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wm0-f49.google.com with SMTP id 62so203005105wmw.1 for <idr@ietf.org>; Tue, 04 Jul 2017 11:14:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=g/64P6OEI0RYK+fYDt+UF/VzPQhO+L6FnRKSulyG5ys=; b=pWluuAcrhj1VkK14RLbVobcJ3SaIo0gDELKDALqpCxuQJmIRSMDyY67DZisjC2GsgZ krCNKgXl4peZKn2E2YwttUTYSqjV0a6oJR3zTskgGXuGQY/tF4UW4J6j3u8hLkK/8La/ NvJICu3ATlMZjB3F9stblPiB2AojqVAKl4p1D9UzkGs3gjBZEv3mVrx1osnZXy/zaRcg I8iKGQcFQ+VuI2jPo6N+ot/rM7xdZ3WEA1wsXxSz2ayuvHd7TwWl/oke5gFCOSMR/B7k 7bawlIsCbQYATORBCbb83rC8PFbWIDYb3BiwFP1KDAsQDB2FyfkHUoRoldIGenriIJN4 TLzA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AKS2vOzbh6cLcmVdU9x7glOHTxgX1YyECShESmIMz9zdCUeycF+A57sN MjDgTQZz37gn6dvuCyhZGA==
X-Received: by 10.80.153.52 with SMTP id k49mr19385582edb.63.1499192096551; Tue, 04 Jul 2017 11:14:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost ([89.200.47.198]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id h18sm10382821eda.46.2017.07.04.11.14.55 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 04 Jul 2017 11:14:55 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Tue, 04 Jul 2017 20:14:54 +0200
From: Job Snijders <job@ntt.net>
To: Jeffrey Haas <jhaas@pfrc.org>
Cc: idr@ietf.org
Message-ID: <20170704181454.la5hw3nyisneefff@Vurt.local>
References: <CACWOCC8tPVD20SJ60h-=NGbPMG3Fae2a0TY5rMFb=EnN7H-C6Q@mail.gmail.com> <m2o9t1z1hj.wl-randy@psg.com> <CACWOCC_bQitHeR9tHc5tPsXmoSDDLQH764equTAHrP854fYh-A@mail.gmail.com> <BF65C4DC-D2F5-41AF-8454-D43B403E328B@juniper.net> <CACWOCC9cmz7ARnWNowCCEu3Rt_NiyuWgJMZ3pWfmxZ_BO8Ovjw@mail.gmail.com> <292534ED-98BC-49A0-82A2-45B6688F851D@juniper.net> <CACWOCC_KTzJLQAJf_j4ZqM1oJSFq9JcyT7aAPLGf3+2Ess7BBA@mail.gmail.com> <09BFF794-6899-4DA5-8EF5-DDF86513BFBA@pfrc.org> <20170704104840.mg5bflnmmjlv4jbi@Vurt.local> <20170704175334.GO2289@pfrc.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20170704175334.GO2289@pfrc.org>
X-Clacks-Overhead: GNU Terry Pratchett
User-Agent: NeoMutt/20170609 (1.8.3)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/hjiTMJULgsd-_Fx-nELkjPyL-Q8>
Subject: Re: [Idr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-idr-rs-bfd-03.txt
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Jul 2017 18:14:59 -0000

On Tue, Jul 04, 2017 at 01:53:34PM -0400, Jeffrey Haas wrote:
> If you'd like to argue "send them 2, and if they both don't work, let
> god and their backup paths sort it out", fine.  You're welcome to run
> your RS that way - if you run a RS.  What I don't understand is why
> you object to someone else doing something different.

I'm not sure what to make of this paragraph?

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email