IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [ietf-smtp] Proposed agenda for EMAILCORE BOF

Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com> Fri, 24 July 2020 11:10 UTC

Return-Path: <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>
X-Original-To: ietf-smtp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf-smtp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 551793A0ED0 for <ietf-smtp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 24 Jul 2020 04:10:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.1
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=isode.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GdQ1rA3bFLSv for <ietf-smtp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 24 Jul 2020 04:10:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from waldorf.isode.com (waldorf.isode.com [62.232.206.188]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 447613A0ECC for <ietf-smtp@ietf.org>; Fri, 24 Jul 2020 04:10:10 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1595589009; d=isode.com; s=june2016; i=@isode.com; bh=oNCS1K8Y341Dr3sngtvRykKOGI3NNtD84pFBwMsa+eM=; h=From:Sender:Reply-To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:To:Cc:MIME-Version: In-Reply-To:References:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description; b=RSh39mQqB+D3hL8AHiMa6VUHFrZU5MQo2zT9nxfbGh1YVGCyvCmfOq//+qr1FvsRnnPsFS iFt6qYdyrLX1iWf9ogMEwsBq5YBZPL7JmweeZETRgBWWCMhUUTFsjb4T/42IYgK7XJAlQZ Ll0PMtp1ZT1JP5oUAKvQB3negSe5Os8=;
Received: from [172.22.22.143] ((unknown) [172.22.22.143]) by waldorf.isode.com (submission channel) via TCP with ESMTPSA id <XxrBkQAkBgLS@waldorf.isode.com>; Fri, 24 Jul 2020 12:10:09 +0100
X-SMTP-Protocol-Errors: NORDNS
To: Michael Peddemors <michael@linuxmagic.com>, ietf-smtp@ietf.org
References: <579f408c-ed7e-9dbe-f626-f0dab2380d13@isode.com> <3b8e5d41-1b61-ca9e-f257-792d3d0f0f6e@dcrocker.net> <a9915d28-8a32-e5d4-daee-6b32775030f5@isode.com> <795414fd-839f-aca4-0a6b-1924e293d437@network-heretics.com> <20615.1595518705@localhost> <58f73c78-ed2e-98dc-85e7-380ecd5d5bda@network-heretics.com> <dc0b1154-6222-d980-19eb-2d2927c081a8@linuxmagic.com>
From: Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>
Message-ID: <67088147-fd78-2b34-21ad-2ad8f7a867bb@isode.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2020 12:10:02 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.10.0
In-Reply-To: <dc0b1154-6222-d980-19eb-2d2927c081a8@linuxmagic.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Language: en-GB
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf-smtp/2h9Uz8Ui-OHOuzhU9IsrM0luK9Q>
Subject: Re: [ietf-smtp] Proposed agenda for EMAILCORE BOF
X-BeenThere: ietf-smtp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion of issues related to Simple Mail Transfer Protocol \(SMTP\) \[RFC 821, RFC 2821, RFC 5321\]" <ietf-smtp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf-smtp>, <mailto:ietf-smtp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf-smtp/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-smtp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-smtp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-smtp>, <mailto:ietf-smtp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2020 11:10:11 -0000

On 23/07/2020 18:14, Michael Peddemors wrote:

> On 2020-07-23 9:27 a.m., Keith Moore wrote:
>>
>> On 7/23/20 11:38 AM, Michael Richardson wrote:
>>> Keith Moore <moore@network-heretics.com> wrote:
>
>>> Would you include DMARC, and the new list-friendly version, of which 
>>> I know
>>> little?
>>
>> My strong preference would be to include none of these, and only SMTP 
>> and MIME specifications.
>>
>> Keith
>
> If you limit to SMTP and MIME, this isn't really 'email core'.
> Including IMAP and possibly others, should be encouraged.

I am basically agreeing with Keith on this, i.e. I disagree. Besides, we 
already have a WG for IMAP: EXTRA.

My idea with EMAILCORE (or whatever better name we can find) is that we 
start with 2-3 email format and SMTP related documents at a time and 
then move on to the next set (which will require rechartering), once we 
finish. This would avoid boiling the ocean.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email