Re: [ietf-smtp] Proposed agenda for EMAILCORE BOF
Keith Moore <moore@network-heretics.com> Thu, 23 July 2020 04:14 UTC
Return-Path: <moore@network-heretics.com>
X-Original-To: ietf-smtp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf-smtp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9E623A0C24 for <ietf-smtp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 22 Jul 2020 21:14:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.919
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.919 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HYwG5xMb2NF4 for <ietf-smtp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 22 Jul 2020 21:14:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out2-smtp.messagingengine.com (out2-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.26]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6A5113A091D for <ietf-smtp@ietf.org>; Wed, 22 Jul 2020 21:14:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from compute4.internal (compute4.nyi.internal [10.202.2.44]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A4115C004A for <ietf-smtp@ietf.org>; Thu, 23 Jul 2020 00:14:28 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute4.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 23 Jul 2020 00:14:28 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; bh=Qbo7rzFtnetNFfx7mzJpzLL9vx6V6Gd43VMzhn0Ca 9E=; b=Nwa44qjfmUbYYmSpCU66Mi+1FyK9aRubRjvPU1d4qCZuHZbam4F6ecu2J 05G4CJ9sCqEE+dAGHstB//EusgjWJofH4y0rnor3CsiIPiDkRoIRH1im4VOQj2I1 E2WlUgnYAV5xHyQUNUM4R38ssNXXtu8Wjhwn9EZ2A4ElmcvEcY/9tS5IG4CJGwZd rMJ61N4wYyyA6I+nsIPrigrd/LeeNm0+12cSXnjdbbfNMujBEzqfMeA/C7BBiEfZ mDuXbNqFXJQ623hN17VBOOcFzkpvUb9BzPpwkcAda+gZK1PAh5rGTTQdhrozmMMM qAK++Z0jTAaXDTisl1lIEF2OTCAvg==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:pA4ZXy9d-dU2j4QDsVIDKoKBO6mmgy7snP7EDhLu4iwE1_Zc0-01-Q>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduiedrhedtgdekfecutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecu uegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecunecujfgurhepuffvfhfhkffffgggjggtgfesthekre dttdefjeenucfhrhhomhepmfgvihhthhcuofhoohhrvgcuoehmohhorhgvsehnvghtfiho rhhkqdhhvghrvghtihgtshdrtghomheqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnhephefhuedtheefgf efgffhkeehgfeugfeiudeugeejkeefleelueeiffetfeeuudeunecukfhppedutdekrddv vddurddukedtrdduheenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrih hlfhhrohhmpehmohhorhgvsehnvghtfihorhhkqdhhvghrvghtihgtshdrtghomh
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:pA4ZXysDLxZOv8u7NysvuR6x_o3M7PJ_i7S36gEPBxk_5_c8ahs-_Q> <xmx:pA4ZX4BT4dsoJWmcpv-brDQaA9SAbOVOQgEJjA3NRnD6z8ivWLl68w> <xmx:pA4ZX6f52E6iMj_3SAlUcaMYtQqYRa85F9ck-_i1ZLh3aYeyIC57Sg> <xmx:pA4ZX5sjYYXdgUIOPY_kCvRxis1ZNJUG9wgNUh8-JaUylbjclbZVzQ>
Received: from [192.168.1.85] (108-221-180-15.lightspeed.knvltn.sbcglobal.net [108.221.180.15]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id EAB1030600A3 for <ietf-smtp@ietf.org>; Thu, 23 Jul 2020 00:14:27 -0400 (EDT)
To: ietf-smtp@ietf.org
References: <579f408c-ed7e-9dbe-f626-f0dab2380d13@isode.com> <3b8e5d41-1b61-ca9e-f257-792d3d0f0f6e@dcrocker.net> <a9915d28-8a32-e5d4-daee-6b32775030f5@isode.com>
From: Keith Moore <moore@network-heretics.com>
Message-ID: <795414fd-839f-aca4-0a6b-1924e293d437@network-heretics.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2020 00:14:27 -0400
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.10.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <a9915d28-8a32-e5d4-daee-6b32775030f5@isode.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf-smtp/98vPssU9mB1DOYXpJnggZpyI67M>
Subject: Re: [ietf-smtp] Proposed agenda for EMAILCORE BOF
X-BeenThere: ietf-smtp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion of issues related to Simple Mail Transfer Protocol \(SMTP\) \[RFC 821, RFC 2821, RFC 5321\]" <ietf-smtp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf-smtp>, <mailto:ietf-smtp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf-smtp/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-smtp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-smtp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-smtp>, <mailto:ietf-smtp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2020 04:14:31 -0000
I would like it to be clarified as to whether the purpose of the BOF is to bash the charter for the proposed EMAILCORE WG. If the purpose of the EMAILCORE WG is indeed to bring the current message format and SMTP specifications to Full Standard, I further propose that any features not in those specifications should be out-of-scope for the WG, unless perhaps any new features are (a) already at Proposed Standard; (b) widely implemented enough to also be considered for Full Standard; and (c) necessary for inclusion in the core specifications in order for the complete set of revised specifications (core + new features) to qualify for Full Standard. (I suppose if someone wants to make a case that the core email specifications are not suitable for advancement to Full Standard but instead should be recycled at Proposed, while the charter is being bashed would also be the time to make that argument.) I would therefore propose that any features that don't meet those criteria either be ruled out-of-scope for the BOF, at least deferred until the WG charter has been bashed. Perhaps if there's time remaining it would make sense to use that time to discuss features that couldn't be taken up by the working group. What I don't think makes any sense at all, at least given the current IETF standards process, is to combine a discussion of adding new features, with a discussion of advancement to Full Standard. Keith
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Proposed agenda for EMAILCORE BOF Dave Crocker
- [ietf-smtp] Proposed agenda for EMAILCORE BOF Alexey Melnikov
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Proposed agenda for EMAILCORE BOF Дилян Палаузов
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Proposed agenda for EMAILCORE BOF Alexey Melnikov
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Proposed agenda for EMAILCORE BOF Dave Crocker
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Proposed agenda for EMAILCORE BOF Alexey Melnikov
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Proposed agenda for EMAILCORE BOF Michael Peddemors
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Proposed agenda for EMAILCORE BOF Alexey Melnikov
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Proposed agenda for EMAILCORE BOF John Levine
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Proposed agenda for EMAILCORE BOF Keith Moore
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Proposed agenda for EMAILCORE BOF Keith Moore
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Proposed agenda for EMAILCORE BOF Michael Richardson
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Proposed agenda for EMAILCORE BOF John Levine
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Proposed agenda for EMAILCORE BOF Keith Moore
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Proposed agenda for EMAILCORE BOF John Levine
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Proposed agenda for EMAILCORE BOF Michael Peddemors
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Proposed agenda for EMAILCORE BOF Keith Moore
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Proposed agenda for EMAILCORE BOF Hector Santos
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Proposed agenda for EMAILCORE BOF Alexey Melnikov
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Proposed agenda for EMAILCORE BOF Alexey Melnikov
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Proposed agenda for EMAILCORE BOF Alexey Melnikov
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Proposed agenda for EMAILCORE BOF Keith Moore
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Proposed agenda for EMAILCORE BOF John Levine
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Proposed agenda for EMAILCORE BOF Keith Moore
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Proposed agenda for EMAILCORE BOF Alessandro Vesely
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Proposed agenda for EMAILCORE BOF Dave Crocker
- [ietf-smtp] Issueds listed in 5321bis Appendix GR… John C Klensin
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Proposed agenda for EMAILCORE BOF Keith Moore
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Issueds listed in 5321bis Appendi… Alessandro Vesely
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Proposed agenda for EMAILCORE BOF Hector Santos