Re: [ietf-smtp] [Proposal] 250-MARKDOWN

Gilles Chehade <gilles@poolp.org> Wed, 09 January 2019 08:38 UTC

Return-Path: <gilles@poolp.org>
X-Original-To: ietf-smtp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf-smtp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96259130DC3 for <ietf-smtp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 Jan 2019 00:38:11 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=poolp.org
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id G1dOPrlLccCg for <ietf-smtp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 Jan 2019 00:38:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: from out.mailbrix.mx (out.mailbrix.mx [212.83.129.132]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9AD85128766 for <ietf-smtp@ietf.org>; Wed, 9 Jan 2019 00:38:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: from poolp.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by poolp.org (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id c6af5ac2; Wed, 9 Jan 2019 09:38:07 +0100 (CET)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=poolp.org; h=date:from:to :cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version:content-type :in-reply-to; s=opensmtpd; bh=aRubSCdVdHak+vGCCS74sHP36/0=; b=yJ Nf2Gg53JuNCPIYCLpfKe8ARBEuQWBUNgapvgFM84wgR6FauViiB5ekdBR3STVQA7 jB0wwjRmT3WvX7860qVbBGp2rxpFDX7J86a8odNoxUHo/j2zwPw63BgBeiRV7TD2 crCMcG1RA//F1UpmUW7lAzOgBUFjAdn6svVMzOnDg=
Received: from localhost (poolp.org [local]) by poolp.org (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPA id 6e18de68; Wed, 9 Jan 2019 09:38:07 +0100 (CET)
Date: Wed, 09 Jan 2019 09:38:07 +0100
From: Gilles Chehade <gilles@poolp.org>
To: Viruthagiri Thirumavalavan <giri@dombox.org>
Cc: Valdis Kletnieks <valdis.kletnieks@vt.edu>, ietf-smtp@ietf.org
Message-ID: <20190109083807.GA41707@ams-1.poolp.org>
References: <CAOEezJRwe9iSbGyBfyHNPn8=2avo6bAoFY56++HLY5+FZHhWgw@mail.gmail.com> <4647.1547019229@turing-police.cc.vt.edu> <CAOEezJSs11cRRd8xYu4TwO1Viayy8CB3-MdAicEKaJRgyn0tdg@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAOEezJSs11cRRd8xYu4TwO1Viayy8CB3-MdAicEKaJRgyn0tdg@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf-smtp/3CwVWIQlvzgq3HMh2UrTkwew1eY>
Subject: Re: [ietf-smtp] [Proposal] 250-MARKDOWN
X-BeenThere: ietf-smtp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion of issues related to Simple Mail Transfer Protocol \(SMTP\) \[RFC 821, RFC 2821, RFC 5321\]" <ietf-smtp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf-smtp>, <mailto:ietf-smtp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf-smtp/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-smtp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-smtp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-smtp>, <mailto:ietf-smtp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Jan 2019 08:38:12 -0000

On Wed, Jan 09, 2019 at 01:10:34PM +0530, Viruthagiri Thirumavalavan wrote:
> >
> > What happens if my mail server doesn't support markdown?
> 
> 
> That's why I'm proposing the MARKDOWN extension. MARKDOWN command should be
> presented in the EHLO response only if your server supports markdown.
> 
> If your server supports markdown, the mail will be transferred as
> text/markdown. Else mail will be transferred as "text/plain" and
> "text/html" as usual.
> 
> I hope I understood you correctly.
> 

still unsure I understand how it works, sorry

my understanding now is that the server translates DATA between markdown
and other content types based on MARKDOWN extension at peer.

did i understand correctly ?


> On Wed, Jan 9, 2019 at 1:03 PM <valdis.kletnieks@vt.edu> wrote:
> 
> > On Wed, 09 Jan 2019 12:29:43 +0530, Viruthagiri Thirumavalavan said:
> >
> > > I wanna bring Markdown support to SMTP.  So instead of transferring both
> > > "text/plain" and "text/html" versions, future mails can use only
> > > "text/markdown".
> >
> > Well, right off the top, there's the end to end problem.
> >
> > Say you support text/markdown, and your mail server accepts it to deliver.
> > What
> > happens if my mail server doesn't support markdown?  Do you send a
> > text/markdown
> > and hope my MUA can deal with it? If you do that, why bother with an SMTP
> > intervention?
> >
> > Also, see RFC1341, and text/richtext. Ask yourself why you never see
> > e-mails with it.
> >
> 
> 
> -- 
> Best Regards,
> 
> Viruthagiri Thirumavalavan
> Dombox, Inc.

> _______________________________________________
> ietf-smtp mailing list
> ietf-smtp@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-smtp


-- 
Gilles Chehade						       @poolpOrg

https://www.poolp.org                 tip me: https://paypal.me/poolpOrg