IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [ietf-smtp] DSNs

Claus Assmann <ietf-smtp@esmtp.org> Fri, 10 April 2020 09:04 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-smtp@esmtp.org>
X-Original-To: ietf-smtp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf-smtp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDA833A1A65 for <ietf-smtp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 10 Apr 2020 02:04:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1_Ch7ifRdTOl for <ietf-smtp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 10 Apr 2020 02:04:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from kiel.esmtp.org (kiel.esmtp.org [195.244.235.220]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8CA853A1A67 for <ietf-smtp@ietf.org>; Fri, 10 Apr 2020 02:04:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from kiel.esmtp.org (localhost. [127.0.0.1]) by kiel.esmtp.org (MeTA1-1.1.Alpha14.1) with ESMTPS (TLS=TLSv1.2, cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384, bits=256, verify=OK) id S0000000000011EF300; Fri, 10 Apr 2020 11:04:31 +0200
Received: (from ca@localhost) by kiel.esmtp.org (8.16.0.41/8.12.10.Beta0/Submit) id 03A94Vhn030553 for ietf-smtp@ietf.org; Fri, 10 Apr 2020 11:04:31 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2020 11:04:30 +0200
From: Claus Assmann <ietf-smtp@esmtp.org>
To: ietf-smtp@ietf.org
Message-ID: <20200410090430.GA75736@kiel.esmtp.org>
Reply-To: ietf-smtp@ietf.org
Mail-Followup-To: ietf-smtp@ietf.org
References: <20200409230011.F039B17637D0@ary.qy> <693d848e-3a83-c1c8-f806-a129a0ab2713@dcrocker.net> <alpine.OSX.2.22.407.2004091945050.80689@ary.qy>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <alpine.OSX.2.22.407.2004091945050.80689@ary.qy>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf-smtp/GRUUbBLysWBz5Ddfz2gqddavlT4>
Subject: Re: [ietf-smtp] DSNs
X-BeenThere: ietf-smtp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion of issues related to Simple Mail Transfer Protocol \(SMTP\) \[RFC 821, RFC 2821, RFC 5321\]" <ietf-smtp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf-smtp>, <mailto:ietf-smtp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf-smtp/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-smtp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-smtp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-smtp>, <mailto:ietf-smtp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2020 09:04:35 -0000

On Thu, Apr 09, 2020, John R Levine wrote:

> Oh, RFC 3461.  Agreed, it's basically an SMTP level web bug.  Nobody
> implements that.

sendmail implemented it too (more than 20 years ago?). I guess it
should read "nobody enables/uses it"?

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email